User talk:JingleRock123

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 01:15, 31 October 2009
JingleRock123 (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff		 Revision as of 12:05, 31 October 2009
RoyDaleOne (Talk | contribs)
(Dwelling Unit 280A)
Next diff →
Line 12: Line 12:
I am not familiar with responding to messages to my username. I am guessing that I have to post a message on your "my talk" page. I am not familiar with responding to messages to my username. I am guessing that I have to post a message on your "my talk" page.
 +
 +== Dwelling Unit 280A ==
 +
 +I have the same confusing understanding of the rules. I generally use the definition for a "dwelling unit" as defined under the 163 rules for 280A, if there is not real true co-ownership in the unit.
 +
 +I can find a number of cases where the way the court applied the rules for the computation of the deduction to be computed that 163 way and not requiring the use 280A apparent way.
 +
 +I was more interesting in your situation where there is no personal use by the taxpayer of the unit as a residence. How do you get to use the 280A rule?
 +
 +You can use the leave a message optin at the top of the user discussion page to satrt your adds to the discussion.
 +
 +Thanks,
 +
 +[[User:RoyDaleOne|RoyDaleOne]] 07:05, 31 October 2009 (CDT)

Revision as of 12:05, 31 October 2009

Leave a message for JingleRock123


This page is where you can leave a message for JingleRock123. JingleRock123 will be notified of messages the next time they access TaxAlmanac.

Please make sure to sign your message by adding four tildes: ~~~~ at the end of your message.

If you are actually JingleRock123, this is your page. Feel free to edit your discussion page to add or remove anything you'd like.

Leave a message for JingleRock123 by clicking here


Fractional Interest

I am confused as to why you may be using Section 280A?

If you are convinced that is correct action, that is fine with me, of course. However, I am not. My research indicated that not all timeshares or fractional ownership properties are subject to Section 280A.

RoyDaleOne 02:01, 30 October 2009 (CDT)

RoyDaleOne,

I am not familiar with responding to messages to my username. I am guessing that I have to post a message on your "my talk" page.

Dwelling Unit 280A

I have the same confusing understanding of the rules. I generally use the definition for a "dwelling unit" as defined under the 163 rules for 280A, if there is not real true co-ownership in the unit.

I can find a number of cases where the way the court applied the rules for the computation of the deduction to be computed that 163 way and not requiring the use 280A apparent way.

I was more interesting in your situation where there is no personal use by the taxpayer of the unit as a residence. How do you get to use the 280A rule?

You can use the leave a message optin at the top of the user discussion page to satrt your adds to the discussion.

Thanks,

RoyDaleOne 07:05, 31 October 2009 (CDT)

Retrieved from "http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/User_talk:JingleRock123"