User contributions
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 02:33, 24 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Anyone have some suggestions for tax relief in this situation? (Re the $17,500 I)
- 01:38, 24 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Bonus from ER w/ not on W-2 (Perhaps I should)
- 00:40, 24 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Bonus from ER w/ not on W-2 (Reporting on lin)
- 23:19, 23 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Insurance agent commissions/S-Corp issue (A problem with c)
- 20:20, 22 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Amended for estimated tax penalty (CP2000's and 104) (top)
- 19:11, 22 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Amended for estimated tax penalty (Definitely not.)
- 01:42, 22 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sch. C vs. Sch. A (2106 reimburseme) (top)
- 00:44, 22 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sch. C vs. Sch. A (I take it the em)
- 23:35, 21 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sch. C vs. Sch. A (T/p is not in an)
- 18:51, 21 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Would you amend? (But no tax chang)
- 18:33, 21 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Does extension showing balance due void a prior year installment agreement? (I'd think not. G)
- 18:26, 21 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Would you amend? (Returns are not)
- 03:08, 20 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax & interest paid after receiving notice - Possible mistake by IRS (File 1040X claim)
- 06:01, 18 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sensitive to audit (> ''TxSrv, how d) (top)
- 17:19, 17 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sensitive to audit (No. IRS' audit s)
- 21:37, 8 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:If I just summarize stock sales on Schedule D, rather than attach a detailed schedule to a paper return or to an 8453, what is the worst that can happen?!?!? (> ''But since 19)
- 20:59, 8 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:If I just summarize stock sales on Schedule D, rather than attach a detailed schedule to a paper return or to an 8453, what is the worst that can happen?!?!? (> ''I cannot fig)
- 17:55, 8 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Minimum age for tax return filing (I'm sure he can)
- 17:14, 8 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Minimum age for tax return filing (''> actually he)
- 13:45, 8 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:If I just summarize stock sales on Schedule D, rather than attach a detailed schedule to a paper return or to an 8453, what is the worst that can happen?!?!? (> ''Does anyone)
- 20:25, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Home office, cost of cable/internet $19,000 (''> ...our own d)
- 13:24, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Home office, cost of cable/internet $19,000 (Does the service)
- 12:47, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:LLC to be closed - No EIN obtained (> ''How about if) (top)
- 00:58, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:LLC to be closed - No EIN obtained (IRS doesn't know)
- 14:05, 6 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Final 1120S w/o Dissolution (Actionbsns, file)
- 05:57, 6 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Final 1120S w/o Dissolution (IRS can't make t)
- 04:44, 6 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Final 1120S w/o Dissolution (Once you've file)
- 03:54, 6 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:MFS Both tp get phone credit (W/o researching)
- 01:48, 26 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mortgage interest deduction and statement attachment (Any attachments)
- 16:27, 25 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Ssn error (A 1040X now coul)
- 15:43, 25 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:LOW TAX AUDIT PERCENTAGE (Filing even refu)
- 14:59, 24 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:General Power of Attorney / signing tax returns (Is it a refund r)
- 04:48, 24 February 2007 (hist) (diff) User:TxSrv (top)
- 03:19, 24 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Two 1099s on one schedule C (''> That's just) (top)
- 18:16, 23 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Two 1099s on one schedule C (Why ''necessaril)
- 15:07, 23 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Two 1099s on one schedule C (As a former Grou)
- 14:17, 23 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Two 1099s on one schedule C (Is there any tax)
- 05:57, 14 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Constructive Receipt (Normcpa, in the)
- 04:38, 14 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Constructive Receipt (Is there any de)
- 22:53, 13 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Business mileage (> I have spoken) (top)
- 22:34, 13 February 2007 (hist) (diff) m User:TxSrv
- 22:30, 13 February 2007 (hist) (diff) User:TxSrv
- 02:44, 4 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:1099 (Why should the e)
- 03:06, 19 January 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Form a PLLC, select Subchapter S Election taxation to avoid SE tax? (The IRS can appl)
- 06:56, 29 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:How Many Audits Did You Have in 2006? (As a now retired)
- 13:41, 18 December 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Amended tax returns exception to the rule when the amended returns are processed by the IRS prior to tax court proceedings (Were the amended)
- 00:46, 25 November 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:LLC - one member to two members (The original EIN)
- 01:28, 26 October 2006 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Amended SS-4/EIN? (You need do noth)
- 00:55, 26 October 2006 (hist) (diff) User:TxSrv (Default new user page)
- 00:55, 26 October 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:TxSrv (Default new user talk page)
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
