User contributions
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 00:23, 12 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Deductible business mileage (rev rul 99-7 et al) (It's a classic h)
- 01:10, 11 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Artist's artwork was stolen & she was reimbursed. Basis of asset? (Not so sure abou)
- 23:45, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Filing Status - Married - Incarcerated (Oi! Master Crow) (top)
- 22:57, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Artist's artwork was stolen & she was reimbursed. Basis of asset? (Gotta use cost b)
- 22:44, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Does anyone use watermarks on client copy
- 22:44, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Does anyone use watermarks on client copy
- 22:42, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Does anyone use watermarks on client copy (Yeah, but it's a)
- 22:35, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Filing Status - Married - Incarcerated (Yes. You only lo)
- 22:30, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:'Reading the Law' (top)
- 22:29, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:'Reading the Law'
- 22:29, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:'Reading the Law' (''"why don't you)
- 22:20, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:More Form 9465 than usual (I've included a)
- 20:30, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Rental Income or Not! This is the Question? (There are too ma)
- 20:18, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Rental Income or Not! This is the Question?
- 05:05, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Rental Income or Not! This is the Question? (It's income all)
- 04:34, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Self-employment income or no? (I'm not sold on)
- 04:22, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:'Reading the Law' (Yup, in CA. One)
- 02:55, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Self-employment income or no? (I take the posit)
- 02:49, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Printer- sch c expense or 179 (''"Plus, I like)
- 01:24, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Printer- sch c expense or 179 (Depends, especia)
- 00:52, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:How unenrolled preparers can get transcripts through e-services (Awww, way to rai)
- 00:46, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Printer- sch c expense or 179 (Depends on your)
- 00:42, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:'Reading the Law'
- 00:40, 10 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:'Reading the Law' (New Discussion)
- 23:26, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can I still work with IRS after 90 day letter? (doh! That was ob) (top)
- 23:25, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Michigan registration / License fee - deductible?
- 23:24, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Michigan registration / License fee - deductible? (Depends on if ev)
- 23:17, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Remaining Inventory - Business Closed (Oh yeah, I remem) (top)
- 22:59, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can I still work with IRS after 90 day letter? (Kevin- ''"you ha)
- 20:50, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:501 c 3 investment loss (I don't think 'i)
- 05:07, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Estimated tax vouchers (One of my client)
- 05:07, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Estimated tax vouchers ("We are going th)
- 04:54, 9 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:So what did you eat the most of this tax season? (Goldfish are goo)
- 22:49, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:So what did you eat the most of this tax season? (El Pollo Loco.)
- 21:38, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:The Wish I Thought of It File (New Discussion) (top)
- 21:10, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Is form 8821 the best way? (I'd just been us)
- 19:52, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Uniforms Controversy (I don't get to u)
- 17:30, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Uniforms Controversy (''"understand yo)
- 17:19, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Is form 8821 the best way? (That doesn't mak)
- 17:10, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Uniforms Controversy
- 17:09, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Uniforms Controversy (Some kind of mac)
- 17:08, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Legal Fees and Non-Compete (Surely defending) (top)
- 15:25, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Retention Bonus
- 15:25, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Retention Bonus (Is there actual)
- 15:14, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Is form 8821 the best way? (8821 should be f)
- 14:58, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Legal Fees and Non-Compete
- 14:57, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Legal Fees and Non-Compete (I don't believe)
- 14:22, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Uniforms Controversy (I am familiar wi)
- 10:36, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Uniforms Controversy (I'm afraid you m)
- 04:44, 8 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Uniforms Controversy (''the company re)
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
