User contributions
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 22:55, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Excess Social Security Tax (Or to be fair, 3)
- 22:04, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Tgrieco (Trade In) (top)
- 21:43, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Why don't they leave these people alone? (New Discussion)
- 21:40, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sea be sick I miss you guys ("doctor says tha)
- 21:14, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Tgrieco (Trade In)
- 21:04, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:1099-MISC issued to a C Corporation? (Agreed, Kevin, i)
- 18:18, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS Audit: Reclassify Premium as SE Income
- 17:23, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS Audit: Reclassify Premium as SE Income (Sounds like the)
- 17:14, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Tgrieco (Trade In)
- 14:13, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New York State Tax (You might read K)
- 13:46, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS Audit: Reclassify Premium as SE Income (I think it would)
- 12:33, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS Audit: Reclassify Premium as SE Income ("The Sales price)
- 00:51, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:1099-MISC issued to a C Corporation? (That raises the)
- 00:39, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Renting a home you don't own (Use the yellow b)
- 00:37, 27 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:S Corp - trade in vehicle. How to do this in ProSeries? (On Line 19 or Li)
- 19:26, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:S Corp - trade in vehicle. How to do this in ProSeries? (Actually, I ofte)
- 19:20, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:FUTA Exempt or no? ([[Publication 15)
- 18:12, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:S Corp - trade in vehicle. How to do this in ProSeries? (I would enter th)
- 15:12, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sec 121 home exclusion-complicated (Why would he, Ke)
- 14:52, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sec 121 home exclusion-complicated (Of course it's n)
- 14:26, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sec 121 home exclusion-complicated (And the real que)
- 14:24, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:1099-C Presumption of Correctness (New Discussion) (top)
- 14:03, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sec 121 home exclusion-complicated (But as I read th)
- 12:28, 26 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sec 121 home exclusion-complicated (You answered you)
- 23:24, 25 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Whore-able Tax Court Outcome
- 23:23, 25 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Whore-able Tax Court Outcome (We had some fun)
- 12:26, 25 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Roth Conversion: "Ratably?" (Check out LH2004)
- 21:46, 24 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (Good lord, that)
- 20:28, 24 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS Notice sent to Accountant's Office (Fax a notice of)
- 20:26, 24 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (Aside from the c)
- 13:02, 24 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Fractional-interest Condo Income/Expenses ("This fraction i)
- 20:24, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Cash from Refinance used in Investment Account (Good case. I s)
- 20:14, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (That's because w)
- 17:34, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (Who could you ev)
- 16:45, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (Unrecaptured 125)
- 16:35, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:S-Corp Vehicle - Is it legal? (And I think the)
- 12:37, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Golf Cart Anyone? (There is 'fair a)
- 12:31, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:I love it! US Tax Court on lack of documentation (She couldn't eve)
- 12:21, 23 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Taxpayer agreed to flawed audit? (And with a POA y)
- 23:30, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Deductibility of Foster Care Payments (Maybe you should)
- 20:30, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Taxpayer agreed to flawed audit? (The auditors wer)
- 19:44, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (But if the taxpa)
- 18:19, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:What is the best way to handle 'wrong' answers ("When I point ne)
- 17:55, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Looking for the Ruling... (And that is what)
- 17:34, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Looking for the Ruling... (And this raises)
- 17:33, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Looking for the Ruling... (http://www.legal)
- 16:57, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (Seaside, that so)
- 16:54, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (Ah, Harry, but y)
- 16:14, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Tax benefit rule/depreciation recapture (I stand by my co)
- 14:53, 22 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:30 Notices for a single client (Could be 941s, 9)
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
