Discussion:Why Didn't CPA Include Undeposited Funds on 1120S?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 02:14, 11 October 2009
Natalie (Talk | contribs)
(Kevin, that comm)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 14:10, 11 October 2009
Southparkcpa (Talk | contribs)
(Totally as an as)
Next diff →
Line 101: Line 101:
{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Natalie|Date=October 11, 2009|Text=Kevin, that comment really doesn't belong here.}} {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Natalie|Date=October 11, 2009|Text=Kevin, that comment really doesn't belong here.}}
 +
 +{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Southparkcpa|Date=11 October 2009|Text=Totally as an aside.
 +
 +I make it VERY CLEAR to my clients that undeposited funds should always be zero. It is a holding/control account for a transaction(s).
 +
 +When you receive payments, make the deposit or why bother.
 +
 +I teach my clients to batch process their reciepts. The balance in the undeposited funds should MATCH the deposit ticket which was added by hand. THEN and only then you make the deposit in QB's, which will agree to the deposit ticket. I hate when a client puts indicidual checks as deposits.
 +
 +"Show me a client with a balance in their "undeposited funds" and I will show you a client with weak internal controls."
 +
 +
 +
 +}}

Revision as of 14:10, 11 October 2009

Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Why Didn't CPA Include Undeposited Funds on 1120S?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Why Didn't CPA Include Undeposited Funds on 1120S?

Sandy L (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
I have a cash-based S corp client whose fiscal year ends June 30th. In reviewing the client's return for period ended 6/30/09, I see that the CPA didn't include the client's 8k in undeposited funds on the balance sheet (1120S Schedule L). Obviously, the books accounted for the amount.

Sound like an error on behalf of the CPA? Doesn't sound like good practice to me. I'm going to call her (CPA) on Mon.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

October 10, 2009
So how did the CPA get the Balance Sheet to balance if the 'undeposited' funds weren't on there?

I usually include them in the cash figure, assuming that the funds are subsequently deposited within a reasonable time.

Sandy L (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
It's not in balance. I'm e-mailing her now and will follow-up Mon. She literally just left out the 8k on Line 1-Cash.

So, now the balance sheet in QB is off by 8k vs. the 1120S, Schedule L. Nice.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

October 10, 2009
Yikes!

My software (while no substitute for a tax professional - Hi Kevin) SCREAMS at me if things don't balance. Keep us posted on the outcome.

And it's interesting that you have an S-corp with a fiscal year end. Rather unusual, I believe.

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
My guess is that the CPA treated it like Accts receivable and "backed it out" of income and either it is NOT on the balance sheet and is backed out of income OR he treated is as M1. Wrong, but if we are playing family feud, that has to be a top guess!

Personally, I "HATE" when I see an accrual Balance sheet on a tax return that is cash basis and then see an M1 item called "acc to cash diff".

Please let usknow.

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
Perhaps it's related to one of those Urban Legends, that I think we've discussed on this forum.

Specifically, when our cash basis clients inform us that they held up on depositing all checks that came in after November 1 in order to avoid paying tax on the income.

It's almost as good as when they tell us that they left a few checks blank so that they could write checks dated 12/31 after the fact & still have them be in order relating to the January checks they wrote subsequently.

All of this as per what their infamous "previous accountant" had advised them was standard procedure.

Michaelstar (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
Southpark's answer seems most in line with my thinking on this as well.

What strikes me though as strange - is a June y/e for an S-Corp. There are specific rules on required y/e's for S-Corps so I hope that is not an issue that has not at least been checked on as well.

Sandy L (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
Thanks for your replies. I'll post the outcome.

Smokeytax: The client's receipts are largely generated via credit card sales. So, it can take up to x-amount of days for the monies to be deposited into the biz checking. Hence, the rather material undeposited funds amount. By all means, the undeposited funds amount can climb as high as 20k, at times, contingent on sales.

Michaelstar: Huh, interesting. Something I need to research now that you bring it up. I must admit that this is the only client I've encountered that's a cash-based S corp w/a June y/e.

Seaside CPA (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
S-Corps can have fiscal year-ends. However, Form 8752 should be filed annually in order to calculate and pay the "required payment."

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

October 10, 2009
Intuit should move the "Undeposited funds" account up the chart of accounts ladder and include it with the cash by default. I'm curious as well to find out how the balance sheet was balanced.

Michaelstar (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
Sandy - I'll add a little more here on the "fiscal" year end of S-Corp's to help out.

S-Corp's can a have fiscal y/e if it is a "natural" business year. See Sec 1378. It needs to pass certain tests but it can be done.

S-Corp's can also have a fiscal y/e if its majority shareholders are on the same year. See Rev.Proc. 2002-37 and 2002-38

S-Corp's can have a fiscal y/e under the special election of sec 444 for which SeasideCPA is referring to by pointing out Form 8752 but this can become expensive in that the deposit does not flow through to the s/h's and the deposit is non-interest bearing.

These are all issues I would want to look at and document in my perm file for the client just to satisfy myself if I were preparing the return.


So yes, there are multiple reasons - but still - a fiscal y/e for an S-Corp is out of the ordinary

Belle (talk|edits) said:

October 10, 2009
Natalie, I agree.

The way QB handles it makes the money basically 'cash (or checks) on hand'. Just because you haven't gotten to the bank yet doesn't change the fact that it's income.

Sandy's description sounds more like a deposit(s)in transit - but still income.

I'm curious to hear the end of this story.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
Why did the CPA cross the road?



Because when he looked in the file, he saw that's what he did the last year.



In other words, the prior CPA just kept doing what he had done before. SALY.

Michaelstar (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2009
Kevin, Kevin, Kevin.........

Sandy L (talk|edits) said:

11 October 2009
Wow, you guys make me even more excited to become certified. Thanks for your replies.


Southparkcpa: I just double-checked. It's a fact that the 8k's not on the balance sheet. It wasn't backed out of income or treated as M1, either????


Seaside CPA: I just reviewed Form 8752. Not sure if/when the client files the form. More fact-finding is needed on this point...


Natalie: Well, I specifically mapped the Undeposited Funds account in QB to the B/S-Assets: Cash acct. to make it elementary for tax software.


Michaelstar: Thanks for all the great info. I am reading up on all you cited.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

October 11, 2009
Kevin, that comment really doesn't belong here.

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

11 October 2009
Totally as an aside.

I make it VERY CLEAR to my clients that undeposited funds should always be zero. It is a holding/control account for a transaction(s).

When you receive payments, make the deposit or why bother.

I teach my clients to batch process their reciepts. The balance in the undeposited funds should MATCH the deposit ticket which was added by hand. THEN and only then you make the deposit in QB's, which will agree to the deposit ticket. I hate when a client puts indicidual checks as deposits.

"Show me a client with a balance in their "undeposited funds" and I will show you a client with weak internal controls."