Discussion:Wage bonus repaid in following yr
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 23:25, 18 March 2008 Taxwizard (Talk | contribs) (Not sure that th) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 23:39, 18 March 2008 PostingFromWork (Talk | contribs) (There was no act) Next diff → |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Taxwizard|Date=18 March 2008|Text=Not sure that the claim of right doctrine applies here since the employee had an actual unrestricted right to income in a prior year (instead of an apparent unrestricted right).}} | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Taxwizard|Date=18 March 2008|Text=Not sure that the claim of right doctrine applies here since the employee had an actual unrestricted right to income in a prior year (instead of an apparent unrestricted right).}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=PostingFromWork|Date=18 March 2008|Text=There was no actual unrestricted right to the income since it was subject to conditions subsequent to payment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If there was an unrestricted right to the money, he wouldn't have to repay it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Roy: How would the options be different? You only get the two options since the repayment was greater then $3000, otherwise you'd be stuck with the misc deduction.}} | ||
Revision as of 23:39, 18 March 2008
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Wage bonus repaid in following yr
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Wage bonus repaid in following yr
Treypeterson (talk|edits) said: | 18 March 2008 |
| If an employee receives a signing bonus, $10K, net $7K, in 2007 and must repay the bonus because he quit in 2008, how does the employer report the repayment to the employee? | |
PostingFromWork (talk|edits) said: | 18 March 2008 |
| The employer would either report it as a a recovery of a tax benefit item, or as other income, on the appropriate schedule or form.
| |
RoyDaleOne (talk|edits) said: | 18 March 2008 |
| Actually, because the amount is greater than $3,000 the options are different. | |
| 18 March 2008 | |
| Not sure that the claim of right doctrine applies here since the employee had an actual unrestricted right to income in a prior year (instead of an apparent unrestricted right). | |
PostingFromWork (talk|edits) said: | 18 March 2008 |
| There was no actual unrestricted right to the income since it was subject to conditions subsequent to payment.
If there was an unrestricted right to the money, he wouldn't have to repay it. Roy: How would the options be different? You only get the two options since the repayment was greater then $3000, otherwise you'd be stuck with the misc deduction. | |


