Discussion:Self Employed Health Insurance Deduction
From TaxAlmanac
| Revision as of 03:18, 15 March 2009 TexCPA (Talk | contribs) (I thought you wo) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Jake (Talk | contribs) (I would not cons) |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Jake|Date=15 March 2009|Text=I would not consider the fact that the spouse could pay for the self employed other spouse's insurance pretax to be a "subsidy". A subsidy would be if the spouse's employer paid for part of the cost of that insurance. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A more difficult question - spouse gets a basic level of LTC insurance for free -paid for my employer (e.g., $50 a day coverage). The spouse can buy a higher level, e.g. $150 a day, but that add on is not subsidized. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In regard to buying the insurance from the working spouse's employer on a pretax basis, that is a better deal than paying for it after tax and taking the SE deduction because that also saves FICA tax. I did that for several years - wife will always do better taking 50% of my soc. sec. so any soc. sec. tax she pays is essentially wasted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | }} | ||
Current revision
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Self Employed Health Insurance Deduction
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2007 |
| I've read the threads and the headliner regarding Chief Counsel Advice (CCA) 200524001,and how it allows for the health insurance to be purchased in the taxpayer's name instead of the business name.
I'm hung up on Sec 162 "Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any taxpayer for any calendar month for which the taxpayer is eligible to participate in any SUBSIDIZED health plan maintained by any employer of the taxpayer or of the spouse of the taxpayer." My client (sole prop) pays for his health insurance separately and his spouse pays for hers through her employer. The word SUBSIDIZED has me confused (it's late). Am I to take it that SUBSIDIZED would mean insurance that is paid for in whole by the spouse's employer, she contributes nothing. Or, any insurance that the employer provides in whole or in part where she contributes something towards it? I guess where I might be going with this is wieghing the cost of both separate insurances versus the cost of the spouse's insurance were she to include her husband on the policy and have her monthly premiums increase according. It might be a case where two separate insurances are cheaper than one 'joint' insurance. Something akin to the now defunct Marriage Penalty. Again it's late. As usual, my mind is thinking in ways that my words don't always convey well. | |
| February 11, 2007 | |
| Subsidy:
1. a direct pecuniary aid furnished by a government to a private industrial undertaking, a charity organization, or the like. 2. a sum paid, often in accordance with a treaty, by one government to another to secure some service in return. 3. a grant or contribution of money. 4. money formerly granted by the English Parliament to the crown for special needs. I think it would mean in whole or in part, but you should wait for others to respond. | |
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2007 |
| I leaning towards it also meaning in whole or in part. I'm trying to split hairs. | |
| 13 March 2009 | |
| Bumping up an old thread here...
Sec. 162 provides that you are not eligible for SE Health deduction if you are eligible for any SUBSIDIZED plan through an employer. Here's the situation. TP is self-employed. TP's spouse works for an employer and participates in employer's group health plan. Employer pays 75% of her premiums. She can enroll her self-employed husband and children in the group plan but she will have to pay 100% of their premiums. Question: Because she needs to pay 100% premiums for the family does it mean that it's not SUBSIDIZED and her husband can deduct SE Health Insurance premiums for him and his kids if he chooses to purchase HI somewhere else? | |
| 14 March 2009 | |
| BusAd -- isn't the insurance purchased through her work all pre-tax? In essence, she's already received a tax benefit by purchasing it pre-tax at work? | |
| 14 March 2009 | |
| Yes, but if she enrolls her family in the employer's insurance, she needs to pay around $1,100 per month is premiums.
At the same time they can purchase a high-deductible plan for $300 per month. They are pretty healthy so it would work for them. My question is: Can she have insurance through her employer (her portion of the premiums will be pre-tax) and at the same time can her self-employed husband buy insurance for him and kids and DEDUCT the premiums under SE Health insurance deduction? | |
| 14 March 2009 | |
| If spouse needs to pay 100% of husbands and children's premiums, then that is not subsidized. You are aware that the deduction for HI for Sch C filers is limited to income from business. | |
| 14 March 2009 | |
| I'm still stuck on pre-tax benefits -- isn't all of her premiums, whether for her or for her husband and children treated as pre-tax and deducted from wages?
We can't deduct it a second time using SE health insurance deduction, can we? | |
| 14 March 2009 | |
| MsManage thanks for your reply.
Illini, in my situation the spouse chooses not to enroll her husband in the employers plan, even though they are eligible. TexCPA, I read the Sec. that your are referring to. My question was regarding what is the meaning of the term SUBSIDIZED under this sec. | |
| 15 March 2009 | |
| I thought you would ask what the term 'ABLE' was,
Although I am not an attorney: 'SUBSIDIZED' support from a source that is not from your own wallet, see 'SUBSIDY' "Financial assistance given by one person or government to another", There are all kinds of private and governmental 'SUBSIDIES' or as I refer to them 'ENTITLEMENTS'Farm subsidies, bank subsidies, auto industry subsidies, social security subsidies, health care subsidies .. I think you get the drift.. TexCPA 22:18, 14 March 2009 (CDT) | |
| 15 March 2009 | |
| I would not consider the fact that the spouse could pay for the self employed other spouse's insurance pretax to be a "subsidy". A subsidy would be if the spouse's employer paid for part of the cost of that insurance.
A more difficult question - spouse gets a basic level of LTC insurance for free -paid for my employer (e.g., $50 a day coverage). The spouse can buy a higher level, e.g. $150 a day, but that add on is not subsidized. In regard to buying the insurance from the working spouse's employer on a pretax basis, that is a better deal than paying for it after tax and taking the SE deduction because that also saves FICA tax. I did that for several years - wife will always do better taking 50% of my soc. sec. so any soc. sec. tax she pays is essentially wasted. | |


