Discussion:Sec 199-Major Subcontractor is a related party
From TaxAlmanac
| Revision as of 13:38, 30 June 2006 Mark Eason (Talk | contribs) (Update: Our RIA) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 14:47, 30 June 2006 Warren (Talk | contribs) (What is the reas) Next diff → |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Our RIA Rep sent me to 199-9 to tiered structure of pass thru entities. This does not apply here. Both the GC, LLC and the Related Subcontractor (S Corp) are owned by the same individuals. I believe this is a subcontract issue not an ownership issue. How close is subcontracting to leasing the employees? If this was a co-employee leasing situation, GC, LLC would be getting the wages even though the W-2's would be in Related Subcontrator's name. | Our RIA Rep sent me to 199-9 to tiered structure of pass thru entities. This does not apply here. Both the GC, LLC and the Related Subcontractor (S Corp) are owned by the same individuals. I believe this is a subcontract issue not an ownership issue. How close is subcontracting to leasing the employees? If this was a co-employee leasing situation, GC, LLC would be getting the wages even though the W-2's would be in Related Subcontrator's name. | ||
| [[User:Mark Eason|Mark Eason]] 08:38, 30 June 2006 (CDT)Mark Eason}} | [[User:Mark Eason|Mark Eason]] 08:38, 30 June 2006 (CDT)Mark Eason}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Warren|Date=30 June 2006|Text=What is the reason that they don't have it set up as an employee leasing situation?}} | ||
Revision as of 14:47, 30 June 2006
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Sec 199-Major Subcontractor is a related party
Mark Eason (talk|edits) said: | 29 June 2006 |
| My problem is that my client (construction industry) is a General Contractor, LLC, that Subcontracted 100% of the job to a Related Party (S Corp)(Partners of GC, LLC, have 80% plus control over S Corp). The example at Reg 1.199-3(m)(6)(v)example(1) show the General Contractor and the Subcontractors all being Unrelated. EAG does not apply to construction if I am reading 199 correctly.
Questions: 1. Will General Contractor (GC), LLC, now have DPGR because the related subcontractor is related? (For this question and this question only assume GC provided no oversight. For the following questions, assume GC provided oversight.) 2. Does Related Subcontractor get 199 on its DPGR and W-2 wages from GC, LLC, job? If not, what happens to its DPGR and W-2 wages from the GC, LLC job? 3. What can GC, LLC, pickup from Related Subcontractor if Related Subcontractor cannot use its share of DPGR and W-2 wages from GC, LLC, job? Can GC, LLC, use Related Subcontractor's wages that relate to GC, LLC, job? | |
Mark Eason (talk|edits) said: | 30 June 2006 |
| Update:
Our RIA Rep sent me to 199-9 to tiered structure of pass thru entities. This does not apply here. Both the GC, LLC and the Related Subcontractor (S Corp) are owned by the same individuals. I believe this is a subcontract issue not an ownership issue. How close is subcontracting to leasing the employees? If this was a co-employee leasing situation, GC, LLC would be getting the wages even though the W-2's would be in Related Subcontrator's name. Mark Eason 08:38, 30 June 2006 (CDT)Mark Eason | |
| 30 June 2006 | |
| What is the reason that they don't have it set up as an employee leasing situation? | |
