Discussion:SCORP STATE APPORTIONMENT
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 20:29, 9 March 2009 Trillium (Talk | contribs) (move from tax forum to ConsQ) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Bjeter (Talk | contribs) (It depends on th) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| {{ForumNewPost|UserID=Vijayacpa|Date=9 March 2009|Text=A consulting company gets its projects done from clients in various states but does not have any offices/establishment except in CA. Should it apportion all its income to CA?}} | {{ForumNewPost|UserID=Vijayacpa|Date=9 March 2009|Text=A consulting company gets its projects done from clients in various states but does not have any offices/establishment except in CA. Should it apportion all its income to CA?}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Bjeter|Date=15 March 2009|Text=It depends on the state(s) involved and what they do in those states. If all of the work is done in CA, then yes, all income is apportioned to CA. What states are involved and what exactly do they do in those states?}} | ||
Current revision
Discussion Forum Index --> Consumer Questions --> SCORP STATE APPORTIONMENT
| 9 March 2009 | |
| A consulting company gets its projects done from clients in various states but does not have any offices/establishment except in CA. Should it apportion all its income to CA? | |
| 15 March 2009 | |
| It depends on the state(s) involved and what they do in those states. If all of the work is done in CA, then yes, all income is apportioned to CA. What states are involved and what exactly do they do in those states? | |
