Discussion:Pilot expenses

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:52, 28 September 2009
Solomon (Talk | contribs)

← Previous diff
Revision as of 21:22, 28 September 2009
Lrussell (Talk | contribs)
(Based on Rev Rul)
Next diff →
Line 9: Line 9:
{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=CrowJD|Date=28 September 2009|Text=The only thing I let my pilots expense is a parachute. It's just the mood I'm in this year.}} {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=CrowJD|Date=28 September 2009|Text=The only thing I let my pilots expense is a parachute. It's just the mood I'm in this year.}}
 +
 +{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Lrussell|Date=28 September 2009|Text=Based on Rev Ruling 73-529, a taxpayer's "home" for purposes of section 162(a)(2) is considered to be located at his regular or princpal place of business. Based on the fact that his base is considered to be Texas, I am assuming this enough to be considered his regular or principal place of business, therefore motel nor rent would be deductible.
 +
 +Here is what I plan to tell my client...not exactly in these words, does this sound correct?
 +
 +"Traveling to and from work is considered commuting expense and is a non-deductible employee expense. The fact that you live 2,000 miles from work and therefore must obtain sleep between the time you leave your Idaho home and the time you arrive at your Texas job, is irrelevant. You should live closer to your job, to avoid having duplicate living expenses.
 +
 +However, unreimbursed traveling expenses incurred on the job, not in connection with commuting, are deductible subject the 2% floor...blah, blah, blah..."
 +}}

Revision as of 21:22, 28 September 2009

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Pilot expenses
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Pilot expenses

Lrussell (talk|edits) said:

28 September 2009
Can anyone provide me with direction with the following?

My client who is a pilot flights are based out of Texas. His permanent residence is currently in Idaho. In any given month, he can be on reserve, meaning he is on call and has to stay at a hotel in Texas. Are the unreimbursed hotel expenses deductible on form 2106? Assuming hotel is deductible, client is considering renting an apartment in Texas and wants to know if he can deduct any portion of the apartment in lieu of the hotel?

Solomon (talk|edits) said:

28 September 2009
See Rev. Ruling 73-529

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

28 September 2009
The only thing I let my pilots expense is a parachute. It's just the mood I'm in this year.

Lrussell (talk|edits) said:

28 September 2009
Based on Rev Ruling 73-529, a taxpayer's "home" for purposes of section 162(a)(2) is considered to be located at his regular or princpal place of business. Based on the fact that his base is considered to be Texas, I am assuming this enough to be considered his regular or principal place of business, therefore motel nor rent would be deductible.

Here is what I plan to tell my client...not exactly in these words, does this sound correct?

"Traveling to and from work is considered commuting expense and is a non-deductible employee expense. The fact that you live 2,000 miles from work and therefore must obtain sleep between the time you leave your Idaho home and the time you arrive at your Texas job, is irrelevant. You should live closer to your job, to avoid having duplicate living expenses.

However, unreimbursed traveling expenses incurred on the job, not in connection with commuting, are deductible subject the 2% floor...blah, blah, blah..."

Personal tools