Discussion:New Accounting Method proposed by IRS Agent
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 14:22, 8 January 2009 Taxalmancer (Talk | contribs) (Did you show the) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 23:47, 8 January 2009 TTMM (Talk | contribs) (Does the client) Next diff → |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Taxalmancer|Date=8 January 2009|Text=Did you show the 2nd auditor the 1st auditor's reort?}} | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Taxalmancer|Date=8 January 2009|Text=Did you show the 2nd auditor the 1st auditor's reort?}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=TTMM|Date=8 January 2009|Text=Does the client still qualify for the first method of accounting? Perhaps they have reached some magic plateau that requires them to change to the second method.}} | ||
Revision as of 23:47, 8 January 2009
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> New Accounting Method proposed by IRS Agent
LandofLincolnCPA (talk|edits) said: | 7 January 2009 |
| In an IRS audit the agent proposed a new accounting method. In a subsequent audit the next agent is proposing a different method. Are we bound by the method the first agent suggested a few years ago. | |
Taxalmancer (talk|edits) said: | 8 January 2009 |
| Did you show the 2nd auditor the 1st auditor's reort? | |
| 8 January 2009 | |
| Does the client still qualify for the first method of accounting? Perhaps they have reached some magic plateau that requires them to change to the second method. | |
