Discussion:Moving duration employ and business travel
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 22:42, 17 April 2009 Cindyloohoo (Talk | contribs) (New Discussion) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 01:23, 18 April 2009 TheTinCook (Talk | contribs) (I'll take the ea) Next diff → |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| {{ForumNewPost|UserID=Cindyloohoo|Date=17 April 2009|Text=Assume employee moves across the country to new principal place of business and is reimbursed by new employer (with appropriate expenses excluded from income). Employee remains employed by employer for the requisite 39 weeks with new location as principal place of business, but is not necessarily physicially present in the new principal place of business for the full 39 weeks (because employee travels to other employer business locations for 14 weeks of year 1). Has employee met the 39 week requirement? More particularly is physical presence required or is the requirement to merely continue to maintain new principal work location for 39 wks? Any rulings / cases to point to?}} | {{ForumNewPost|UserID=Cindyloohoo|Date=17 April 2009|Text=Assume employee moves across the country to new principal place of business and is reimbursed by new employer (with appropriate expenses excluded from income). Employee remains employed by employer for the requisite 39 weeks with new location as principal place of business, but is not necessarily physicially present in the new principal place of business for the full 39 weeks (because employee travels to other employer business locations for 14 weeks of year 1). Has employee met the 39 week requirement? More particularly is physical presence required or is the requirement to merely continue to maintain new principal work location for 39 wks? Any rulings / cases to point to?}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=TheTinCook|Date=18 April 2009|Text=I'll take the easy way out and point you to §217(d)(1)(A) and §1.217-2(d)(1)}} | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 18 April 2009
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Moving duration employ and business travel
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Moving duration employ and business travel
Cindyloohoo (talk|edits) said: | 17 April 2009 |
| Assume employee moves across the country to new principal place of business and is reimbursed by new employer (with appropriate expenses excluded from income). Employee remains employed by employer for the requisite 39 weeks with new location as principal place of business, but is not necessarily physicially present in the new principal place of business for the full 39 weeks (because employee travels to other employer business locations for 14 weeks of year 1). Has employee met the 39 week requirement? More particularly is physical presence required or is the requirement to merely continue to maintain new principal work location for 39 wks? Any rulings / cases to point to? | |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 18 April 2009 |
| I'll take the easy way out and point you to §217(d)(1)(A) and §1.217-2(d)(1) | |
