Discussion:Merger Reporting Requirement
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 03:24, 5 August 2006 Riley2 (Talk | contribs) (See Reg §1.368-) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 00:39, 30 July 2009 Chase (Talk | contribs) (Do the disclosur) Next diff → |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Riley2|Date=5 August 2006|Text=See Reg §1.368-3T for required disclosure statements.}} | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Riley2|Date=5 August 2006|Text=See Reg §1.368-3T for required disclosure statements.}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Chase|Date=30 July 2009|Text=Do the disclosure statements at 1.368 also apply to an LLC (taxed as partnership) which merged into a C Corporation? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is the 1.368-3(a) required to be attached to the final 1065 while the partners will attach a 1.368(b) to their 2009 tax returns, the year in which the merger occurred?}} | ||
Revision as of 00:39, 30 July 2009
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Merger Reporting Requirement
| 4 August 2006 | |
| What is the mechanics of reporting two corporations merging on the federal return where one Corp continues to operate and the other dissapears? On Form 100 for CA, there is a "Merger/Reorganized" box available to check. However, no such box is available on Form 1120 or on Form 966. Thank you. | |
| 30 July 2009 | |
| Do the disclosure statements at 1.368 also apply to an LLC (taxed as partnership) which merged into a C Corporation?
Is the 1.368-3(a) required to be attached to the final 1065 while the partners will attach a 1.368(b) to their 2009 tax returns, the year in which the merger occurred? | |
