Discussion:Looking for the Ruling...

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 17:33, 22 October 2009
Death&Taxes (Talk | contribs)
(http://www.legal)
← Previous diff		 Revision as of 17:33, 22 October 2009
SCCPA (Talk | contribs)
(See Sec. 6654 IR)
Next diff →
Line 29: Line 29:
Found it given by Riley in [[Discussion: Penalty Abatement]]}} Found it given by Riley in [[Discussion: Penalty Abatement]]}}
 +
 +{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=SCCPA|Date=22 October 2009|Text=See Sec. 6654 IRC. The estimated tax penalty is based in part on the required annual payment defined in Sec. 6654(d)(1)(B)
 +
 +
 +''B) Required annual payment
 +''For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term ''required annual payment'' means the lesser of -
 +''
 +
 +''i) 90 percent of the tax shown on the return for the taxable year (or, if no return is filed, 90 percent of the tax for such year), or''
 +
 +
 +''(ii) 100 percent of the tax shown on the return of the individual for the preceding taxable year. Clause (ii) shall not apply if the preceding taxable year was not a taxable year of 12 months or if the individual did not file a return for such preceding taxable year.''''
 +
 +
 +Note the wording refers to the tax shown on the return, not the tax required to be shown on the return.
 +}}

Revision as of 17:33, 22 October 2009

Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> Looking for the Ruling...
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Looking for the Ruling...

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

22 October 2009
Can someone point me towards the IRS ruling that the Underestimated Tax Penalty - Form 2210 - can't be recomputed on a later amended return. Thanks.

I have dutifully tried The Yellow Box of Search but I get either Everything or Nothing. Operator Error, I'm sure, but I don't have time to learn new tricks...

Refrigpbrerator.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

22 October 2009
I'm busy backpeddling right now. When I get to where I've come from, I'll let you know.



Kid: "I'd like to buy a round trip ticket, please."

Greyhound Bus Agent: "To where?"

Kid: "Why to here, of course!"

Trillium (talk|edits) said:

22 October 2009
Can't help you with the ruling but here's a paragraph from the instructions:
Return. In these instructions, “return” refers to your original return. However, an amended return is considered the original return if it is filed by the due date (including extensions) of the original return. Also, a joint return that replaces previously filed separate returns is considered the original return.

Wait for D&T, though, he's seen it in action (here).

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

22 October 2009
http://www.legalbitstream.com/scripts/isyswebext.dll?op=get&uri=/isysquery/irl27d0/1/doc

Rev Ruling 83-36

Found it given by Riley in Discussion: Penalty Abatement

SCCPA (talk|edits) said:

22 October 2009
See Sec. 6654 IRC. The estimated tax penalty is based in part on the required annual payment defined in Sec. 6654(d)(1)(B)


B) Required annual payment For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term required annual payment means the lesser of -

i) 90 percent of the tax shown on the return for the taxable year (or, if no return is filed, 90 percent of the tax for such year), or


(ii) 100 percent of the tax shown on the return of the individual for the preceding taxable year. Clause (ii) shall not apply if the preceding taxable year was not a taxable year of 12 months or if the individual did not file a return for such preceding taxable year.''


Note the wording refers to the tax shown on the return, not the tax required to be shown on the return.

Retrieved from "http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:Looking_for_the_Ruling..."