Discussion:First time homebuyer
From TaxAlmanac
| Revision as of 13:06, 3 May 2009 TAXBILLY (Talk | contribs) (To which rule ar) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 13:42, 3 May 2009 Deback (Talk | contribs) (I would guess sh) Next diff → |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| 9)Election out of IRC § 263A requires that the Alternative Depreciation System, per IRC § 168(g)(2), must be applied to all property used predominantly in any farming business of the taxpayer or related person and placed in service in any taxable year during which the election is in effect. [Treas. Reg. § 1.263A-4(d)(4)(ii)] | 9)Election out of IRC § 263A requires that the Alternative Depreciation System, per IRC § 168(g)(2), must be applied to all property used predominantly in any farming business of the taxpayer or related person and placed in service in any taxable year during which the election is in effect. [Treas. Reg. § 1.263A-4(d)(4)(ii)] | ||
| taxbilly}} | taxbilly}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Deback|Date=May 3, 2009|Text=I would guess she is referring to the rule that states the credit is not available if the house was purchased from a related person. Since the father only built the home and didn't actually own it (as far as using the home for any reason after he built it), I'd say the son is eligible for the credit.}} | ||
Revision as of 13:42, 3 May 2009
Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> First time homebuyer
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> First time homebuyer
| 2 May 2009 | |
| My client is a contractor who is building a house for his son. The son has never owned a home. The mortgage for the house will be in the son's name. Is the fact that the dad is building the house going to make the son inelligible for the first time homebuyer's credit due to related party rules? | |
| 3 May 2009 | |
| To which rule are you referring?
1)Auto expenses of related employees are not exempted from the substantiation requirements merely because of an accounting to the employer. [Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.274-5T(f)(5)(ii)] 2)Anti-Churning rules. Property owned or used at any time by the taxpayer or related party, except for residential rental property or non-residential real property. See IRC § 168(f)(5)(B) for additional details. 3)Deductions for rentals between related parties or controlled entities are not allowed in excess of a reasonable rental. (Social Psychological Services, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-565) 4)Installment sales. In general, disposition of property within two years after a sale between related parties triggers recognition of gain by the initial seller based on the seller’s gross profit ratio to the extent the amount realized from the second disposition exceeds actual payments made under the installment sale. [IRC § 453(e)] 5)Imputed interest rate for members of the same family. An installment sale of land qualifies for imputed interest of no more than six percent compounded semi-annually, for sales or exchanges of land between family members not exceeding $500,000 during any calendar year. [IRC § 483(e)] 6)Acquisition of debt by a person related to the debtor from a person not related to the debtor results in the debtor’s realization of discharge of indebtedness income, measured by the difference between the face value and fair market value of the indebtedness on the acquisition date. [IRC § 108(e)(4)] 7)Cash basis taxpayer can deduct an expense if it is paid to related accrual basis taxpayer, who was required to include it as income. This is also true for the reverse situation.(IRC § 267) 8)A non-arms-length transaction between related taxpayers is subject to reallocation in order to clearly reflect income and expenses. (IRC § 482) 9)Election out of IRC § 263A requires that the Alternative Depreciation System, per IRC § 168(g)(2), must be applied to all property used predominantly in any farming business of the taxpayer or related person and placed in service in any taxable year during which the election is in effect. [Treas. Reg. § 1.263A-4(d)(4)(ii)] taxbilly | |
| May 3, 2009 | |
| I would guess she is referring to the rule that states the credit is not available if the house was purchased from a related person. Since the father only built the home and didn't actually own it (as far as using the home for any reason after he built it), I'd say the son is eligible for the credit. | |


