Discussion:Disabled Adult Child - Am I missing Something?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 22:45, 8 April 2008
PostingFromWork (Talk | contribs)
(Nancy, you are a)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 22:45, 8 April 2008
PostingFromWork (Talk | contribs)
(corrected some grammer)
Next diff →
Line 13: Line 13:
{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Nancyshoemake|Date=8 April 2008|Text=But they do not provide more than half of her support. }} {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Nancyshoemake|Date=8 April 2008|Text=But they do not provide more than half of her support. }}
-{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=PostingFromWork|Date=8 April 2008|Text=Nancy, you are asking the wrong question. The question is if the daughter is providing over half of his own support. Since the daughter is permanently and totally disabled, and is staying at a medical facility (which counts as a temporary absence) the daughter otherwise qualifies as a Qualifying Child.}}+{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=PostingFromWork|Date=8 April 2008|Text=Nancy, you are asking the wrong question. The question is if the daughter is providing over half of her own support. Since the daughter is permanently and totally disabled, and is staying at a medical facility (which counts as a temporary absence) the daughter otherwise qualifies as a Qualifying Child.}}

Revision as of 22:45, 8 April 2008

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Disabled Adult Child - Am I missing Something?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Disabled Adult Child - Am I missing Something?

LJK CPA (talk|edits) said:

8 April 2008
I have a client whose adult, disabled daughter was moved into a group facility (with medical care) during 2007. This means that my client cannot claim head of household or the dependency exemption (unless she provides more than 50% of her daughter's support). I think the state is paying more than 50%. We tried to prepare the client for this, but she is extremely frustrated.

Just in case I am missing something, is anyone aware of any special rules that would apply here? Thanks for your time!

Nancyshoemake (talk|edits) said:

8 April 2008
Sounds like you got it! So sad....too bad....we don't make the rules!

TaxFlake (talk|edits) said:

8 April 2008
Can she fall under 'temporary absence' rules?

Haven't researched, just thinking out loud.

Nancyshoemake (talk|edits) said:

8 April 2008
But they do not provide more than half of her support.

PostingFromWork (talk|edits) said:

8 April 2008
Nancy, you are asking the wrong question. The question is if the daughter is providing over half of her own support. Since the daughter is permanently and totally disabled, and is staying at a medical facility (which counts as a temporary absence) the daughter otherwise qualifies as a Qualifying Child.