Discussion:Confused... accounting method and bad debt

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 21:19, 7 October 2009
Marcellah (Talk | contribs)
(geez...i'm getti)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 21:43, 7 October 2009
Smokeytax (Talk | contribs)
(I wouldn't think)
Next diff →
Line 20: Line 20:
{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Marcellah|Date=7 October 2009|Text=geez...i'm getting old. Forgot it was 09 already. }} {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Marcellah|Date=7 October 2009|Text=geez...i'm getting old. Forgot it was 09 already. }}
 +
 +{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Smokeytax|Date=7 October 2009|Text=I wouldn't think he needs to pay tax on a receivable outstanding at the end of 2008 that he never collected.}}

Revision as of 21:43, 7 October 2009

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Confused... accounting method and bad debt
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Confused... accounting method and bad debt

Newtaxguy (talk|edits) said:

October 7, 2009
My client has a consulting business and has been reporting "accrual" accounting. Now he wants to change to "cash" before filing his 2008 return, given that he was stiffed by a client for $80k in fees that he would prefer not to report as income.

Can client change methods now, today, for 2008 (via a 3115, obviously) to avoid reporting this income?

Thanks

Marcellah (talk|edits) said:

7 October 2009
If he is on the accrual method and it is truly an uncollectable debt is he not going to have bad debt write-off (expense) to offset the income?

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

October 7, 2009
You're confused? I'm confused.

A. Has he filed prior returns on accrual? If so, tough, stuck without a 3115 and some good reasons, and I'd say it's too late for 08. If not, he can file cash basis no prob. B. Yes, if he has a letter from someone saying it's bad debt, then it's out for 08 anyway.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

7 October 2009
it may not have become a bad debt until 09, is the problem

Larry0434 (talk|edits) said:

7 October 2009
Review Rev Proc 2001-10 to see if it is applicable.

Marcellah (talk|edits) said:

7 October 2009
geez...i'm getting old. Forgot it was 09 already.

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

7 October 2009
I wouldn't think he needs to pay tax on a receivable outstanding at the end of 2008 that he never collected.