Discussion:Change in basis for a CRT after date of death?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 18:34, 28 October 2009
Murphyqu03 (Talk | contribs)
(i.e gains passed)
← Previous diff
Revision as of 22:46, 28 October 2009
Dennis (Talk | contribs)
(Net Unrealized A)
Next diff →
Line 19: Line 19:
{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Murphyqu03|Date=28 October 2009|Text=i.e gains passed through to the income beneficiaries on the K-1 will be more or less depending on whether the assets receive a step up in basis or not.}} {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Murphyqu03|Date=28 October 2009|Text=i.e gains passed through to the income beneficiaries on the K-1 will be more or less depending on whether the assets receive a step up in basis or not.}}
 +
 +{{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Dennis|Date=28 October 2009|Text=Net Unrealized Appreciation is specifically an item of IRD. If you want to get really picky about the journal entries (which are not material to a CRUT) you can book NUA as an asset to match book and estate tax value and keep track of undistributed NUA. Lord knows how you would fill out the 5227. (And Lord knows how I would handle this if the remainder were not a charity.) Appreciate that my discussion is purely theoretical and that the tax code most certainly has holes.}}

Revision as of 22:46, 28 October 2009

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Change in basis for a CRT after date of death?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Change in basis for a CRT after date of death?

Murphyqu03 (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2009
This question is in addition to a question I already posted about a week ago. Thank you for everyone that responded-

I have a client that created a CRT. After his death his wife becomes income beneficiary until her death. He died and the entire amount of the CRT was included in his estate because of the annuity payment to my client.

My question is - Does the CRT (for purposes of the time between the death of my client and the death of his spouse) receive a step-up in basis of the stock held at date of death due to the inclusion of the value in the estate tax return?

I do not believe it would, but am in a disagreement with colleagues. I cannot find definitive law, examples or anything to further my case. Any ideas? thanks!

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2009
Perhaps I explained this badly the first time. There is no step up for income. Nada. Revaluation of the trust for estate tax purpose does not change an income interest into a capital asset. The taxability of payments from the CRT to the survivor will be no different than if they had been received by the decedent. That is the nature of IRD. If there is a tax due on the value of the income interest there will be a corresponding credit for estate taxes paid. The step up in basis accrues solely to the residual beneficiary which is the charity and therefore meaningless.

Murphyqu03 (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2009
Thanks Dennis for your input. I was hoping you would find this thread!

I guess I was concerned with if the trust sells an asset during the life of the surviving spouse for a large gain. When the beneficiary receives a K-1 from the trust it might be different depending on what the trust's basis is in those shares right?

You'll have to forgive me I do not have much experience with CRT's.

Murphyqu03 (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2009
i.e gains passed through to the income beneficiaries on the K-1 will be more or less depending on whether the assets receive a step up in basis or not.

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

28 October 2009
Net Unrealized Appreciation is specifically an item of IRD. If you want to get really picky about the journal entries (which are not material to a CRUT) you can book NUA as an asset to match book and estate tax value and keep track of undistributed NUA. Lord knows how you would fill out the 5227. (And Lord knows how I would handle this if the remainder were not a charity.) Appreciate that my discussion is purely theoretical and that the tax code most certainly has holes.