Discussion:California safe-harbor classification as non-resident
From TaxAlmanac
| Revision as of 00:22, 4 June 2009 Lalva (Talk | contribs) (New Discussion) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 05:12, 4 June 2009 Lalva (Talk | contribs) (Also, does the T) Next diff → |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Thank you! | Thank you! | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Lalva|Date=4 June 2009|Text=Also, does the TP qualify for the safe harbor since he got married in CA in 2008 before the passing of Proposition 8, and the marriage is still valid? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks}} | ||
Revision as of 05:12, 4 June 2009
Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> California safe-harbor classification as non-resident
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> California safe-harbor classification as non-resident
| 4 June 2009 | |
| I want to ask those brilliant minds out there (you know who you are) about the California safe harbor to file as non-resident (TC Sec 17014).
My client has been absent from CA (living in the UK) for several years, since 2006. His domestic partner had a contract to work there, so he moved with his partner. In mid-2008 he started a job with a British company and he will be working there at least until the end of 2009, if not more. My question is, can he file as a CA non-resident claiming the safe harbor? He has been working in the UK all this time, but as self-employed. Does this also count toward the 546 days? …and he has CA ties, since he has a rental property, and is planning on returning at some point next year. Thank you! | |
| 4 June 2009 | |
| Also, does the TP qualify for the safe harbor since he got married in CA in 2008 before the passing of Proposition 8, and the marriage is still valid?
Thanks | |
