Discussion:California Protective Claim

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search

Dingodile (Talk | contribs)
(New Discussion)
Next diff →

Revision as of 16:09, 27 May 2009

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> California Protective Claim
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> California Protective Claim

Dingodile (talk|edits) said:

27 May 2009
I've been retained to examine whether a denial of a protective claim on the grounds that he contingency described was not appropriate is valid. However, I can't seem to find any statute or regulation that defines protective claims or indicates what types of contingencies are appropriate for protective claims. I've only found FTB public bulletins regarding the LLC fee or amnesty. I'm wondering if any such statute exists or if protective claims are merely an administrative remedy? Any insight would be helpful. Thank you.
Retrieved from "http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:California_Protective_Claim"