Discussion:Auto expense in S Corp
From TaxAlmanac
| Revision as of 01:19, 7 February 2008 Abhay (Talk | contribs) (I have a new que) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 01:57, 7 February 2008 Johnhuddleston (Talk | contribs) (If your principa) Next diff → |
||
| Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
| {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Abhay|Date=7 February 2008|Text=I have a new question. Can a 100% Scorp (based at home) owner/employee deduct commute from home to the client office? The commute is about 3 times a week and rest is work done from home. | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Abhay|Date=7 February 2008|Text=I have a new question. Can a 100% Scorp (based at home) owner/employee deduct commute from home to the client office? The commute is about 3 times a week and rest is work done from home. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=Johnhuddleston|Date=7 February 2008|Text=If your principal place of business is in the home, that travel is deductible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | John Huddleston | ||
| + | [http://huddlestontax.com/id131.html Seattle Bellevue Tax Accountant] | ||
| }} | }} | ||
Revision as of 01:57, 7 February 2008
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Auto expense in S Corp
| 25 January 2006 | |
| Currently, the 100% S-corp shareholder owns a vehicle and uses it for business trips and meeting with clients (30% business use). Does the corporation have to OWN a vehicle in order to claim auto expense such as gas, repairs & maintenance OR mileage exp. I think tolls and parking can be in addition to actual expense or mileage. Please advise. THanks. | |
| 26 January 2006 | |
| You may have a choice of standard mileage rate or actual expenses, but either way, yes, the expenses can be deducted on the 1120S but only 30%, either way. Tolls and parking would be 100% is for business. | |
| 27 January 2006 | |
| Thanks for your reply, LJACPA. What are the tax implications if the business actually OWNS the vehicle - would all the expenses then be 100%?
Or should that (purchase auto through company) be a consideration? Any advice would be appreciated. | |
| 27 January 2006 | |
| 30% of auto expenses are deductible. It does not matter who owns the car. 70 % non deductible if 100% paid by corp. Show 70% as shareholder distribution. | |
| 27 January 2006 | |
| What DZCPZ said. This is one area that I receive extensive questions about and probably one of the most abused and one that the IRS loves to delve into. Unless the vehicle is indisputably a business vehicle, expenses must be allocated between business and personal use. It does not matter whether the company owns it or the individual owns it and putting advertising on it doesn't matter either. I think putting it simply, keep track of your personal vs. business use and deduct accordingly.LJACPA 14:48, 27 January 2006 (CST) | |
| 28 January 2006 | |
| Thanks, all. I will make a final point. I guess then, the advantage of having company-owned vehicle is being able to take depreciation of purchase cost, insurance cost, and interest paid on the loan. Is there a disadvantage? | |
| 28 January 2006 | |
| I think you're still missing the bottom line. You can take depreciation and other actual expenses (vs. standard mileage rate), but you still cannot deduct 100%. The deduction is still based upon the personal vs. business use. The only way you'll be able to deduct 100% is to include the personal use in the employee/shareholder's compensation. And it is subject to FICA.LJACPA 10:55, 28 January 2006 (CST) | |
| 29 January 2006 | |
| I think for an S Corp the personal use of a company owned vehicle should be treated as "wages" and part of the W-2 verus a shareholder distribution. Or, if the vehicle is in the name of the shareholder, but the Corporation pays 100% of the expenses, same answer, the personal use is teated as taxable wages. | |
| 9 February 2006 | |
| Code Section 280F excludes 5% or greater shareholders personal use from the definition of "qualified business use", which creates a potential problem with including the personal use in the shareholder's compensation. The language of 280F requires a limitation of depreciation to business use percentage. Therefore, if depreciation is limited to 30% for the shareholder, and you have included a taxable fringe benefit in their wages for the 70% FMV, then the taxpayer is in essence taxed twice - loosing the deduction and adding taxable compensation. How do you reconcile this contradiction in the code?RSNayls 12:09, 9 February 2006 (CST) | |
| 16 February 2006 | |
| I fail to see the contradiction. TP uses 30% of vehicle for business and business deducts 30% of expenses. 70% of expenses are not "lost," they are personal and not deductible to begin with. This 70% is included in the TP wages because that is the benefit that was provided to him from the business that the business paid. | |
| 16 February 2006 | |
| What is done in many corporations is to have the company own the vehicle and have stated in writing (employment agreement, BOD minutes, etc) that personal use of the vehicle is prohibited except for driving to and from work. Then the corporation deducts 100% of the expenses and the commute miles are included as income on the W-2 at the standard mileage rate. Of course, doing this means that you are not supposed to use the vehicle for personal use. | |
| 23 February 2006 | |
| Are there any advantages of having the compay own the vehicle? | |
| 24 February 2006 | |
| I have heard that if the company owns the vehicle then they may not use SMR - - this is supposidly a new ruling. True????? | |
DR BRISKET (talk|edits) said: | 24 February 2006 |
| I have always taken the position that shareholders who drive a vehicle for company business should own the vehicle personally and turn in periodic expense reports for reimbursement. They can charge the regular Standard Mileage Allowance. This way, there is no inputed income to the shareholder for personal usage, and the company has a legitimate business expense to deduct on its books. | |
| 12 March 2006 | |
| Suppose an S corporation provides some personal use of a car to a 100% shareholder. Further assume the personal use is reported on W-2 as a Fica - taxable $500 item, based on the value of a leased similar car, using 20% as personal use. How will the S corp manage this on its books (cash basis bookkeeping)? I presume the S corp should be able to take a deduction for the $500, but unlike its other expense items, there is no check written. Therefore the cash books and the tax return are not reconciled, and the M2 reconciliation on the 1120 S tax return does not seem to be a good place to reconcile. Since assets and liabilities of the S corp are not affected by the provision of the benefit, it must somehow affect the retained earnings, I guess. | |
| 13 March 2006 | |
| I guess I take a different approach on personal use of vehicles. Usually when I am preparing a corporate tax return the W-2's are long since finalized and filed. I have a booklet on auto expenses, I think published by CCH, that contains a chart showing the annual lease value of a vehicle which cost $x. Based on the percentage of personal use, I multiply the lease value per the table times the personal use percentage. If the corporation pays for all the gas & oil as well, there is a figure if 5.5 cents per mile that I add. (Don't know where this figure came from and since I have had this book for at least 10 years, the 5.5 cents per mile is probably too low). Company records 100% of the depreciation and 100% of the auto expenses. The lease value chart is based on a 4 year lease. So after year 4 I figure the FMV of the vehicle and determine a new annual lease rate. I make a journal entry to record misc income and debit either S distributions or receivable from officer. The receivable will ultimately get cleared either throught payroll or through S distributions, so one way or the other it is being repaid by the owner. | |
| 13 March 2006 | |
| My company is an S corporation. My business partner and I are majority shareholers. Are we allowed to take car allowances? We would do this and then own our cars individually and then take our deductions on our personal taxes based on personal use vs. business use. Would the car allowance payment be considered wages? Would the company have to pay SS etc. if the allowance is condsidered wages. | |
| 13 March 2006 | |
| If you pay a flat car allowance it would indeed be includible in W-2 wages, subject to income and FICA taxes. If you do this, you can claim your actual auto expenses or you can claim a standard mileage allowance on Form 2106. Alternatively, you may want to consider setting up an "accountable plan" whereby business miles are turned in monthly for reimbursement at the standard mileage rate. | |
| 13 March 2006 | |
| Like JDugan...I do something different as well. (And I have learned that S Corps may not use mileage rates...surprise to me.) But since the W2's are long done by the time we do the corp taxes, I merely reduce the amount of total vehicle expenses by the personal use, note is an M1 adjustment...thereby the corp is only deducting the biz portion. The personal portion goes to the shareholder's note...Other than the picking of nits over the technicality of it not being on the W2 and picking up a few bucks of SS taxes...I can't see the difference. And I might add, I really like my W2's/Qtrly 941's/Reported Wages on returns to match up, so I just bristle at adding stuff to W2's unnecessarily, and esp. when you can't get the info in time to do it!
Thoughts/suggestions? | |
| 14 March 2006 | |
| My accountant is suggesting yet another alternative. I personally lease a vehicle and use it about 80% for business. I formed S-corp starting Q2 2005. I am sole owner and employee. On my schedule C last year (and for Q1 this year) I deduct biz portion of actual cost incurred (prorated per a mileage log).
Accountant states that since I own over 5% of my S-corp, I can't do actual expenses, I must do a mileage-based reimbursement. (sounds contradictory to JR1) My accountant's "logic" is that if I need a new transmission, the IRS will not let me deduct 'biz portion' of that large 'actual' expense. Seems silly to me, especially since I didn't have any extraordinarily large actual expenses. I live in a compact town, so my total miles (biz + personal) are low, thus my actual cost per mile is higher than SMR. Another rule we found states that a small company cannot do an auto plan, i.e. a flat allowance each month as a benefit. I think you need 10 participants or something like that. My accountant's solution is to figure out actual expenses and get reimbursed based on miles driven for business. (ala Jdugancpa's "accountable plan") In my case, it works out to about 80 cents per mile. The difference between the 80 cents and the federal standard needs to get reported as income. After reading the notes above, I see other complications: 1) Since the diff between standard mileage rates and my 80 cents is taxable income anyway, wouldn't it be simpler (and same effect on bottom line) just to reimburse me the standard rate and forget the 80 cents? 2) JR1's assertion that you can't use mileage rates seems to contradict my accountants advice. (yes my W-2 is already filed and I don't want to amend it) Where did you find the rule re: no mileage rates for S-corps? I'd really prefer to stick with the actual expenses, submitting an 'expense report' on a periodic basis for reimbursement, and deducting that as a legitimate biz expense of the S-corp. I am not looking to write off personal use as a biz expense, I just want to get my actual expenses as a deduction. Head hurt yet? | |
| 17 March 2006 | |
| For an S-Corp - if the shareholder owns the vehicle, and the shareholder is reimbursed for business miles at the standard mileage rate, does Section B on Form 4562 (information on use of vehicles) need to be completed? I'm using Turbotax for Business and when I answered that there was no company owned car, it did not take me to that section. The business deduction amount is simply listed under Automobile expense under the deductions on Form 1120S. | |
| 17 March 2006 | |
| To clarify, my understanding is that you can use mileage rates as a reimbursement. You cannot use mileage when the corp owns the vehicle in order to determine the auto use at year end. So as long as you turn in your mileage, you're golden. I don't know about the idea of getting reimubursed at 80 cents a mile, tho! That would qualify as an uaccountable plan and make that subject to taxes, included on your W2, which ain't what you're after.
Sounds like he's billing by the hour to come up with something that convoluted. I disagree with your accountant, you can use actual expenses for reimbursement. I'd merely have the corp. pick up the expenses and credit you for out of pocket reimbursements.. From here on, just have the corp. pay all the expenses (like everybody else does!) and exclude the personal portion at year end/add to W2, etc. | |
| 25 March 2006 | |
| What if the scorp owner has a 65K vehicle over 6000 lbs that can have 18k in depreciation can the corp reimburse him 18k or less due to biz percent. If the std. mileage rate is taken this leaves a lot of write-off on the table. | |
| 29 March 2006 | |
| Where does an S corporation deduct employee business expense reimbursements (accountable plans) on 1120S? Is it line 19? If one were to reimburse monthly would you list just the monthly reimbursement, or every item in the reimbursement? | |
| 29 March 2006 | |
| I enter them on the Other Deductions worksheet as local travel/mileage/parking. I want to separate it from Auto expense, and Travel expense, both of which get extra scrutiny. | |
| 29 March 2006 | |
| What about reimbursing employee for home office expenses? Are all reimbursed expenses included on the Other Deductions worksheet? | |
| 29 March 2006 | |
| Yeah, unless it's a category on page 1. Those I'd put to Office. | |
| 29 March 2006 | |
| So the reimbursement rent of a home office would go on page1 under the rent category? Is there a special worksheet for the Other Deductions worksheet, or do you create the categories and list yourself? | |
| 24 June 2006 | |
| Hello,
I noted in this chat that Ahe72 & JR1 discuss home office expense deductions for 1120S filers. I was under the understanding that a S Corp home office was not handled the same way as a Sch C filer since their is no home office form and the home in most cases if not all cases is not owned by the corporation but by the individual. Rather the S Corporation should pay a FMV rent to the home owner/shareholder. This rent is reported on 1120S as rent expense. The homeowner/shareholder would then report this rent income on 1040 Sch E. The allocated business useage for the home office expenses & depreciation would go on Sch E as well. Another words this home office basically becomes a rental property for the business allocated percentage. Warning: be sure that a lease agreement is drawn up between the leasee and leasor. Susan | |
| 26 June 2006 | |
| On mileage, i like the idea that the employee (taxpayer) submit expense reports for the mileage on a personally owned vehicle. However, what if this is an SUV, must the limitations for a luxury vehicle be applied? | |
| 27 June 2006 | |
| If you're using mileage, limitations (depreciation) does not matter. Mileage rates include a component for depreciation. | |
| 27 June 2006 | |
| If the owner of the company claims to use the SUV solely for business and has a second family car that they use for personal, is that a "red flag" if they write off 100% to the SCorp? | |
| 28 June 2006 | |
| Whoops. The rules say that an SCorp shareholder may not deduct a home office/self rental in the traditional way. I don't understand why, it just is. Riley or Dennis or someone can explain the why. But...you can only take the appropriate portion of expenses on the 1120S, and nothing gets picked up on the 1040. Example: your S corp uses 10% of your home for business. 10% of the interest, taxes, r/m, utilities, etc. all go on the 1120S. No rent, no lease. | |
| 29 June 2006 | |
| For mixed use vehicles, think long and hard before using the "Actual Expenses" method. It may seem like a good idea in the first year or 2, especially if you're eligible for Sec 179, but over the long haul the client generally gets a larger deduction with the standard mileage method. Unless the total mileage is VERY low and the client trades vehicles every couple of years... | |
| 2 August 2006 | |
| A Corp. owns a vehicle and in the minutes of the corp.it requires the owner to drive the
car home in the evenings for protection purposes. Will these miles be business or commuting for the owner. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 2 August 2006 |
| JR1, that is code, not rules. Here from Checkpoint is a discussion of the legislative intent:
"S Rept No. 99-313 (PL 99-514) p. 84 . Where such a lease arrangement exists, the only deductions that are allowable are those that would be allowable in the absence of any business use, e.g., mortgage interest, real estate taxes and casualty losses. 16 However, under these circumstances, only otherwise deductible personal” casualty losses are deductible. The rule discussed above bars any deduction for business casualty losses, as well as trade or business expenses and depreciation, with respect to any portion of a taxpayer's dwelling unit rented by the taxpayer to his employer, and used by the taxpayer to perform services as an employee for the employer." I know some S owners use accountable plans to reimburse for their use of home, but I have always wondered how someone would prove that 16.6% of their utilities were used for business. | |
| 17 February 2007 | |
| Bird Legs,
My thought would be, just because the corp resolution states that the car should be driven home, the IRS will still treat as non-business use. What about the miles to drive the car back? :o) I don't think that would fly. We'll see what the more experienced preparers say...... | |
Gmacdon167 (talk|edits) said: | 18 February 2007 |
| In most instances, I use the standard of having the shareholder own the vehicle instead of the corp, reimbursing for business use at the standard mileage rate. My logic is simple, no need to "gross up" personal and commuting use. Also, I encourage them to buy a more fuel efficent vehicle so that they may even come out ahead with the mileage reimbursement vs actual expenses incurred. Additionally, there are other costs to be considered. If there is just one business use vehicle in play, a personal auto policy with family multi-car discounts is usually dramatically lower than having a commercial auto policy (since it would be owned and titled to the corp if handled properly).
Obviously if it's a situation where a work truck (or perhaps a tool truck that would not have to report commuting miles) I would recommend something different. Just my two cents. | |
| 18 February 2007 | |
| Gmacdon167,
This all make so much sense to me! I fail to understand why business owners want to complicate things. So there it is, the vehicle, in order to be listed as business property, I feel should be titled to the business. Therefore, as you say, if it is titled to the business, technically a commercial auto policy should be in place. | |
| 19 February 2007 | |
| As I read these accounts, I believe that as an owner in a Subchapter S Corporation who drives his own vehicle between our stores, I can submit monthly requests for reimbursement at the standard mileage rate and this produces a standard business deduction for the corporation and no additional tax liability to me.
Where do I look in the tax publications to find the law? Lani | |
| 23 February 2007 | |
| what about a sole proprietor making lease payments on another's lease, but using the car for his business? i don't see anything that precludes deducting lease payments for a car on another's lease. | |
| 25 February 2007 | |
| S-corp, vehicle owned by more than 5% owner/employee, driven 100% for business, S-Corp pays monthly rental to owner in same amount as loan payment. S-corp pays all actual expenses.
Since the business usage is 100% and documented, there is no $ amount on W-2. Should the S-Corp issue a 1099-MISC to employee for the rents paid to employee for the lease of that vehicle from the employee? If so, where would the employee deduct the expenses that offset that income on tax return (the depreciation and interest expense)? What is the correct way to handle this for tax purposes? What is the best way to handle this (actual expenses do and will always exceed standard mileage rate)? Please help have to get taxes filed. Thank you. In a previous post I see a mention of using a due to/from shareholder account, would that be more appropriate? | |
| 7 February 2008 | |
| I have a new question. Can a 100% Scorp (based at home) owner/employee deduct commute from home to the client office? The commute is about 3 times a week and rest is work done from home. | |
Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said: | 7 February 2008 |
| If your principal place of business is in the home, that travel is deductible.
John Huddleston Seattle Bellevue Tax Accountant | |


