Discussion:An Amended Amended
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 17:03, 6 April 2009 Fsteincpa (Talk | contribs) (New Discussion) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 17:20, 6 April 2009 RJM (Talk | contribs) (Had to do an ame) Next diff → |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=RJM|Date=6 April 2009|Text=Had to do an amended amended a couple years ago, and there was no problem. Just made sure that there was a several month delay between the 2, and included a note on the 1040X pg 2 explaining this was 2nd amended.}} | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 6 April 2009
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> An Amended Amended
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> An Amended Amended
| 6 April 2009 | |
| Client had a fire in 2006. Gave me the figures for a substantial casualty loss and also said that not all the figures were totaled up. We did the amended last year and now he indicates that there was another 24,000 in casualty loss for the 2006 year.
This guy had records for everything and when he says his loss was $24,000 higher I believe him. the question I have is how much of a so-called "red-flag" is it to re-amend the 2006 return? | |
| 6 April 2009 | |
| Had to do an amended amended a couple years ago, and there was no problem. Just made sure that there was a several month delay between the 2, and included a note on the 1040X pg 2 explaining this was 2nd amended. | |
