Discussion:1099-C - Individual
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 00:48, 2 November 2009 Solomon (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision TexCPA (Talk | contribs) (Thanks for the l) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| [http://www.rothcpa.com/misc/20091023-1.pdf Cavoto vs Hayes].}} | [http://www.rothcpa.com/misc/20091023-1.pdf Cavoto vs Hayes].}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ForumReplyPost|UserID=TexCPA|Date=2 November 2009|Text=Thanks for the link Solomon, I wouldn't say you were wrong, it seems most of the past discussions related to 'business cancellation' from non-payment, I liked the part were it was not specifically dis-allowed to file a 1099-C, also the part that in order to claim the 'non business bad debt' one had to file a 1099-C, which was not true. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:TexCPA|TexCPA]] 21:18, 1 November 2009 (CST)}} | ||
Current revision
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> 1099-C - Individual
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> 1099-C - Individual
| 2 November 2009 | |
| There has been some discussion in the past regarding a non-applicable entity filing a 1099-C under §6050P. As I recall, (perhaps erroneously) the consensus was it should not be done. However, see: | |
| 2 November 2009 | |
| Thanks for the link Solomon, I wouldn't say you were wrong, it seems most of the past discussions related to 'business cancellation' from non-payment, I liked the part were it was not specifically dis-allowed to file a 1099-C, also the part that in order to claim the 'non business bad debt' one had to file a 1099-C, which was not true.
TexCPA 21:18, 1 November 2009 (CST) | |
