User talk:Solomon

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search
Leave a message for Solomon


This page is where you can leave a message for Solomon. Solomon will be notified of messages the next time they access TaxAlmanac.

Please make sure to sign your message by adding four tildes: ~~~~ at the end of your message.

If you are actually Solomon, this is your page. Feel free to edit your discussion page to add or remove anything you'd like.

Leave a message for Solomon by clicking here


Contents

Instructions

Excellent! Thank you for all of your hard work!!

By the way... I see that you've discovered that when you add headings with the equal signs that it automatically adds the little table of contents box. If you have less than 4 headings, it won't put that on the page. If you want to force it to have one anyway, or if you want to tell it exactly where to put it, just type __TOC__ (two underscores on each side) and it'll put the table of contents right there.

- Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator - Talk to me 20:14, 15 January 2007 (CST)

Good response

Solomon: Your surgical exposition of the tax law is a joy to behold, your advice is appreciated, and right on. But, I must say that your response to L-7, in your display of unerring precision, and pregnancy of meaning, is unmatched in my experience with this site. Way to go!
Forum Award  This user has been recognized as a top contributor of high-quality replies in the TaxAlmanac Discussion Forum.
Forum Award
This user has been recognized as a top contributor of high-quality replies in the TaxAlmanac Discussion Forum.
CrowJD 22:42, 17 September 2007 (CDT)


Equitable or Beneficial Ownership

Nice article Solomon. It amazes me how much I "thought" I knew last season about mortgage interest and ended up learning about. Skhyatt 23:03, 16 October 2007 (CDT)

Section 121 - Building a house

Hi Solomon,

Thank you for your input in regard to my Section 121 question. Now, I can understand Reg. 1.163-10T(p)(5) may qualify taxpayer's home as his/her qualified residence during those 24 months construction period. But how can I utilize this rule to substantiate the 2 years "use" test under Section 121? Is there any court case(s) that I might refer to? Your help is highly appreciared. Thank you again.


Fernando

love your name and the bible verse...so so true!

Personal tools

Discussion Forums