User talk:Mgmea

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search
Leave a message for Mgmea


This page is where you can leave a message for Mgmea. Mgmea will be notified of messages the next time they access TaxAlmanac.

Please make sure to sign your message by adding four tildes: ~~~~ at the end of your message.

If you are actually Mgmea, this is your page. Feel free to edit your discussion page to add or remove anything you'd like.

Leave a message for Mgmea by clicking here


Discussion:Reposted - LTD and Not Workers Comp BUH DUH

Hi MG,

I appreciate your input to my post a few weeks ago and you seem to have a handle on this one. I'm a little stumped now that I know what needs to be done.

Looking for more input on this one. My main concern now is what numbers I use for the lump sum averaging. original amounts excluding dbl payments or amended amounts that include the dbl.

Logic would dictate that I use the amounts excluding the dbl wages. If the SS was received those years as it should have been, then there would not have been w-2 dbl wages. Therefore lower income in regards to SS tax calc.

Could I argue this position?

Does that make sense? And yes, I know logic and sense doesn't always correlate to IRS logic.

Thanks

Fred

Fsteincpa 08:58, 30 March 2008 (CDT)


Below is what was posted last night in a blurred haze.

Now, let me see if I get this straight for the current year. Looks like multiple issues now. Lump sum averaging

I can still Lump sum average the SS received in 2007.

If yes, should this be based on the amended amounts with the disability amounts added in? Or should I base them on the original return amount? significant difference in tax arises.

Theoretically then, if I use lower amounts for prior year, do I back out the DBL I included in income in 2006. Logic would dictate that I use the higher dollar amount, but then this is like replacement money. My head hurts.

Claim of right -

No claim of right for 2004 and 2005 because he omitted, but, he omitted incorrectly it appears. Could claim of right be argured.

2006 I included in income thinking that this money is her money. So, legitimate claim of right for 2006.

did I say my head hurts?

client coming in tomorrow.

Retrieved from "http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/User_talk:Death%26Taxes"

Personal tools

Discussion Forums