User contributions
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 07:32, 19 May 2007 (hist) (diff) TaxAlmanac:Top Contributors (top)
- 07:30, 19 May 2007 (hist) (diff) TaxAlmanac Top Contributors
- 07:24, 19 May 2007 (hist) (diff) TaxAlmanac:User Introductions
- 07:19, 17 May 2007 (hist) (diff) User:PGattoCPA
- 07:18, 17 May 2007 (hist) (diff) User:PGattoCPA
- 07:14, 17 May 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:PGattoCPA (top)
- 07:12, 17 May 2007 (hist) (diff) User:PGattoCPA
- 05:42, 15 May 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:PGattoCPA
- 05:42, 15 May 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:PGattoCPA
- 05:42, 15 May 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:PGattoCPA
- 09:41, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Controlled group (And you still ha) (top)
- 09:35, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:California Corporate Apportionment
- 09:35, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:California Corporate Apportionment (Wdsaltman: Do y)
- 09:31, 7 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:California Corporate Apportionment (Debenz: I'm con)
- 06:56, 6 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:C corp reimbursed for failed product development (I'm not sure wha)
- 06:46, 6 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:California Corporate Apportionment (1) Unitary is ir)
- 18:58, 5 March 2007 (hist) (diff) User talk:JR1 (Apology)
- 18:51, 5 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:C- Corp with 23 K-1s ('''JR1:''' Didn)
- 14:42, 5 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:C- Corp with 23 K-1s (Vent)
- 20:18, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:C- Corp with 23 K-1s (Jeshay: Another)
- 20:07, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:C- Corp with 23 K-1s
- 20:05, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:C- Corp with 23 K-1s
- 20:05, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:C- Corp with 23 K-1s (JR1: I have a C)
- 05:42, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:C- Corp with 23 K-1s (How about over a)
- 04:28, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:LLP to smllc
- 04:27, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:LLP to smllc (Woah Nelly!! Th)
- 01:44, 4 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:RURAL MAIL CARRIERS (KY: When the st)
- 06:41, 2 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Corporate Tax Accrual (I know it's been) (top)
- 06:17, 2 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Controlled group (No Kenneth, it i)
- 03:51, 1 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Controlled group (Can you tell us)
- 03:45, 1 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Client hasn't filed tax return in years (Let's see - he w)
- 19:32, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Controlled group (The §1561 state)
- 16:26, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Controlled group
- 16:26, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Controlled group (Kathyt: Good ca)
- 15:46, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Controlled group (There is no repo)
- 15:35, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) m Discussion:Crime in neighborhood as unforeseen circumstance?
- 15:29, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Crime in neighborhood as unforeseen circumstance? (PLR 200615011:)
- 02:38, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Corporate Tax Accrual (Also, with respe)
- 02:36, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Corporate Tax Accrual (Glmpllc is corre)
- 00:43, 28 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Corporate Tax Accrual (Karen: I'm not)
- 18:06, 27 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Getting yelled at by a non client T T (Pegoo, can you c)
- 17:11, 27 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sale of investment artwork at a loss
- 17:10, 27 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sale of investment artwork at a loss (I would think th)
- 17:02, 27 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:IRS audit, should i amend state right away ? (Unless it is dif) (top)
- 16:23, 27 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Schedule M-3 (In all seriousne) (top)
- 15:20, 27 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Schedule M-3 (Schedule M-3 is)
- 05:01, 27 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Sale of Duplex - 1/2 Personal and 1/2 Rental (From the way you)
- 23:47, 26 February 2007 (hist) (diff) m Discussion Archives:Exempt
- 23:46, 26 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion Archives:Exempt (Dar asked "Why i)
- 23:01, 26 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Discussion Archives:Exempt (Unless he's a fi)
(Latest | Earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)