User contributions
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 17:56, 24 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Deductible Advertising Expense for Mardi Gras expensed paid by Business? ([Lucien Rolland)
- 14:47, 24 November 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:LM 35EA (taxworks) (top)
- 18:12, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:LM 35EA (taxworks program)
- 18:09, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:TAXWORKS SOFTWARE (By the way...I j)
- 14:30, 23 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:TAXWORKS SOFTWARE (another great th)
- 18:35, 22 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:TAXWORKS SOFTWARE (Pros = Price, qu)
- 20:58, 21 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Ilegal aliens - tax consequences (When in doubt re)
- 22:12, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Looking for Benchmark Industry Information (No kidding...WD-)
- 19:42, 20 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Looking for Benchmark Industry Information (WD-40 is much be)
- 18:45, 19 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Any suggestions for ACH Debit software? (google <u>ACH De) (top)
- 19:18, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Lump Sum payment in lieu of alimony (you might search) (top)
- 16:03, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Mandatory e-File (Most states allo)
- 15:06, 18 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (My last comment)
- 18:49, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE ('''''"Pearl, To)
- 17:17, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (I'm talking abou)
- 17:10, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (but my understan)
- 17:10, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (well....they mig)
- 16:43, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (everyone has the)
- 16:38, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (Mom # 1 rents 4)
- 16:02, 17 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CLAIMED BY TWO UNMARRIED PARENTS IN THE SAME HOUSE (Old thread...dif)
- 18:34, 10 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:World Series of Poker...FICA or not? (I don't know how)
- 15:14, 10 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:World Series of Poker...FICA or not? (?)
- 14:52, 10 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:World Series of Poker...FICA or not? (I'm thinking tha)
- 16:44, 9 November 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:World Series of Poker...FICA or not? (New Discussion)
- 20:47, 30 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:TAXWORKS SOFTWARE (I have used TaxW)
- 14:15, 21 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Incorrect 1099-R/Form 5498 (I would think th) (top)
- 17:22, 20 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Incorrect 1099-R/Form 5498 (I believe most t)
- 15:36, 15 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Client did not receive stimulus check in 2008 (yes...I agree, b) (top)
- 14:46, 15 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Client did not receive stimulus check in 2008 (New client this)
- 18:07, 29 September 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Going nuts on dependent/head of household question! (ummm...my high s)
- 17:22, 29 September 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Going nuts on dependent/head of household question! (If I paid '''$1,)
- 16:20, 23 September 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:MFJ Return - Spouses in different states (Believe that bot)
- 15:19, 26 August 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:JR1 (disolving Illinois Corp)
- 13:39, 25 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Single member LLC rental hiring spouse (Thanks for input)
- 15:46, 24 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Single member LLC rental hiring spouse (New Discussion)
- 16:38, 18 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New Licensing Rules? (Arthur Anderson.)
- 16:04, 18 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New Licensing Rules? (I think..AA, EE,)
- 21:55, 12 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:New Rules For E-Services (I had to hand ca)
- 15:24, 6 August 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:JR1 (forgot to leave my name)
- 20:51, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Majic jack for telephone (google majic jac)
- 18:28, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can LLC consist with only limited partners? (Well...if I deci)
- 18:12, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:JR1 (Illinois pass thru IL-1000 clarification)
- 18:00, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can LLC consist with only limited partners? (Client has check)
- 17:27, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can LLC consist with only limited partners? (No payroll at al)
- 17:02, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can LLC consist with only limited partners?
- 17:01, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can LLC consist with only limited partners? (and the GP would)
- 16:53, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can LLC consist with only limited partners? (trying to fix qu)
- 16:49, 5 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Can LLC consist with only limited partners? (New Discussion)
- 15:42, 31 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Going paperless...Proseries DMS or others? (Kevin..what is t)
- 22:18, 28 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Discussion:Important Information For Retailers of Alcoholic Beverages - In NYS (guess that would)
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
