Discussion:Test Discussion
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Test Area --> Test Discussion
February 16, 2007 | |
This is a test discussion
Sec. 123 Reg. 1.123-1 Publication 17 12345 hj |
22 January 2009 | |
I am just testing formating. I 'hope' I am not screwing up |
22 January 2009 | |
this is a long sentence and i want to second sentence here |
22 January 2009 | |
Hmmm... the shows up sentence two bolded sentence tree underline sentence four italized one space and this this
|
Midtenntax (talk|edits) said: | 16 November 2012 |
* Test line one
|
Midtenntax (talk|edits) said: | 16 November 2012 |
*Test line one
|
Midtenntax (talk|edits) said: | 16 November 2012 |
I think it should look like this.
Scenario 1 - Bonus Thru the Corp
NET ADDITIONAL TAX TO SHAREHOLDER IS $674 Scenario 2 - Dividend
NET ADDITIONAL TAX TO SHAREHOLDER IS $1500 So, as you can see, it is better to bonus it as comp rather than paying dividend because it results in a smaller additional tax owed when viewing the two entities as one. |
2 February 2013 | |
This is a test:
Hi |
</div>
Spell Czech (talk|edits) said: | 26 August 2013 |
***** |
Actionbsns (talk|edits) said: | 8 January 2014 |
Spell, did you check that with the spell checker? I'm not sure you got it right. PVV and Makbo, you both get A's for proper grammar and punctuation, oh and for complete sentences. :) |
To join in on this discussion, you must first
log in.