Discussion:What does TaxAlmanac need?
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> What does TaxAlmanac need?
| January 19, 2007 | |
| What improvements does TaxAlmanac need? What would you make better? What is it missing?
Here are a few examples to get the discussion started:
Let me know what you want! Thanks!
| |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| A handy link to all forums would be nice. I usually click Home and then click Tax Almanac on my bookmarks file. Also, your 4th suggestion would be nice, too. | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| I'd love some kind of a marker that allows me to flag a discussion for followup reponses. Maybe a save as favorites or an email automated notifier when a response comes in to that discussion.
But hte board is great, I've learned so much, and it is my own little addiction to read these daily. So thanks for your work! | |
Roxnpa1040 (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2007 |
| Your #2 is much needed-I know i mentioned that last year. Also, the little box that we check at the bottom of our reply "Watch this discussion" doesn't seem to have any effect or affect? Plus, I have to refresh the page myself to see updated replies. Outlook express refreshes itself, can't Tax Almanac? | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Beenge: Have you ever noticed the check box below labeled "Watch this discussion". If you check it you will receive an E-mail that something has been added to the discussion. Roxnpa: The "Watch this discussion box does work! | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Anyone that is as challenged in spelling as I am should be using Firefox. I swear buy it. Spell check on any text box that is loaded into the browser...
On Tim's short list #2 is most needed IMO. Also, another site that I follow daily has a 300 second refresh timer built it which is nice. The graphic on the 'Tab' header changes and I know I that that Tab has new information to be reviewed. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| How about using a 3rd party forum script? www.vbulletin.com = very robust | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| How about a conference for non-practitioners - so anyone wishing to answer their issues can do so and it wouldn't interfere with the practitioner subjects.
But it should be made clear that this is NOT a homework solution board, or a help-me-do-it-myself forum. | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| Thank you for all the comments - keep them coming!
Also, in regards to the handy links to all forums, take a look on the left column under the sponsors section... Will that work? | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Will: Re-read your post. Do you see the irony and limitation of spell checkers? ("buy" v "by") <VBG> Or should we add a grammer checker to the request list?!?
| |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| ahahah, yes, please add a grammar checker. If it wasn't for my nifty spell-checker though, your miss-spelling of grammar would have sailed right by me...:)
| |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| The thing just feels cumbersome, compared to any other forum I've been a part of. They all use a similar style engine which makes moving around and posting and watching threads rather easy. Here...it's just...slower, non-intuitive...which I've presumed was due to the Wiki aspects of it. I've never been part of a Wiki thing before, so have no basis of comparison. But if you compare other boards with this one, you'll immediately know what I mean. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Tim: First off, great job on what you already have! I love to come here and see that others have some of the same problems that I do. (some even have more!). When I come here, I don't even look at the home page, I go right to the discussions. Sometimes people will post a link to "breaking news", and I find this helpful. As we get into busy season, I like the sites that have just a few word title of latest "breaking news" that I can link to if it is something in my area. If the home page was more current, and concise, that would be GREAT! (I know, I know let's see how much more work we can put on your plate......) | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| Will - miss-spelling? Paste that into dictionary.com and see what you get. :)
JR - Agree. I guess it's just the nature of Wiki. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Deback: Hey, if there is no red line under it, I'm posting it!! lol | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| I wish the carriage returns would work all the time. Sometimes, they work, and sometimes, they don't. I always hit the CR (Enter key) twice for paragraphs, but I usually have to hit it three times for it to work right. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Reminds me of the OLD joke. Woman knocks on door and little boy answers.
Woman: Hello young man. Is your mother home? Boy: No, she ain't home. Woman: Why young man, where is your grammar? Boy: Oh, she's in the kitchen baking cookies. The way this is diplayed in TA highlights the carriage return problem mentioned above as well. I did not hit CR twice purposely. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2007 |
| I, the man who cannot stop writing, is coming up almost blank. I do wish I did not have to log in again after being out from 11:30 until 1:15 today, and I do wish some wonderful person could somehow index discussions more like the tree type index I find in my cookbooks. You know: Eggs and then inddented Benedict, Boiled, Deviled etc, but lately I've tried my hand at categories [Bless Deb for making me realize how needed it is] and find often it is hard to pin them down. I too wish the CR would always work and the type easier to format. I can never remember if ' means bold or italic and how to bring it about. I don't mind the DIY people; it is frustrating sometimes but sometimes it is rewarding. Finally, I just wish it weren't so darn addictive. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| One other thing....What if there was a heading with who the original post was from? That way if you only want to answer "professional" questions, or you only want to answer "DIY" questions, you could. Sometimes I think that the posts for DIY go into too much detail....we want to give a full and complete answer... | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2007 |
| That is a great idea, PJ! Also, we have so many discussions that begin one place, seem to be petering out and then someone asks a new question and we end up with 60 or 70 answers. Tim did explain how to edit and create a new question, but do you think I can remember. It would be nice if there was an OT block to check in each discussion block, a way to say 'my contribution is Off Topic, like a joke or personal thought.' | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| And the expressions would be so much easier if I didn't need to remember, which I don't: "33&^%" to make it do something. It'll be interesting to see what that pops up! How about a button for bold, underline, etc. And where the heck do we get some smilies and swords and fireballs and stuff? Just because most of you are boring doesn't mean the rest of us shouldn't have some expressive toolage. | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| >>"Tim did explain how to edit and create a new question, but do you think I can remember."
Or have the time to split messages.... Right now, I'm taking time messing around here, when I should be working. One of these days, real soon, I need to get my priorities straight. | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| Thanks, Tim, for adding the links at the left. Now I just have to scroll down past the advertisement to get to the All Forums link, instead of the normal two clicks. It's usually quicker to click All Forums than click the Back button on my mouse. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Get the Code up to date. Regs would be nice.
I'd love it if there were nice, indexed, complete sets of rulings, PLRs, tax treaties, state laws... | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2007 |
| Thoughts while waiting for the Philadelphia Revenue Department's one assister to pick up the phone: I had to check edit to see how Deb 'real sooned' her words. My first try is bold Italics then I dropped an apostrophe. Do you know how many times I have printed Tim's FAQs only to lose them. I am sure when I open Martha Hutchins' file the next time a copy will pop out. I did start a separate folder of items from here, and blue, not manila, but do you think I can find it. | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| I was able to memorize this a day or two ago, when I finally took the time to go to the Help page and study it for more than a second.
| |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| >>I am sure when I open Martha Hutchins' file the next time a copy will pop out
| |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2007 |
| In my basement processing room in Valatie NY, on April 15, 1999 the two women copying extensions lost my client's 200,000 check to California for his extension! After 45 minutes they found it, attached to his Federal extension which needed no check and was in an envelope for Fresno, luckily unsealed. The one said to the other, "Donna, we would have had to work for David forever for nothing to make up for that." I told them I was on the verge of calling the State Police to send a matron to take both of them upstairs to the bathroom and strip search them!
| |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| >> I do wish I did not have to log in again after being out from 11:30 until 1:15 today
D&T: It's probably your browser settings because the only time I am logged out is if I purposely clear the cookies in the browser. For example, it's probaly been two weeks since I've had to log back in to TA. Here is what I think you need to do: 1) When you first log in remember to check the "Remember me" box. 2) In your "Preferences" area of TA, in the "User Data" page in the "Change Password" section at the bottom, check the "Remember across sessions" box. 3) In your browser settings tell it to NOT clear cookies upon exit. It's probably located in the Tools menu under Internet Options and Security. One or all of these may fix your problem. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2007 |
| I'd not seen the Remember across section before. Oddly for about 5 weeks I never had to log in, then about November 1st it began again. Thanks so much, PG | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| Same's been happening to me, regularly. Will now do as Sr. Gato er Gatto suggests and see what happens. Gracias in advance if it works. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| I would like professionals to not be able to post until they complete their profile so we all know we are talking with other professionals and not giving out free advice to "DIY'ers".
I agree with Uncle Sam (above) that non-professionals should have their own forum where we could choose to view or not choose to view. I want to help people in this business because they will help me at sometime. I don't want to help people who have no intention of helping me. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 19 January 2007 |
| Kevin: several of our people have acquired clients from here, DIYers impressed by the knowledge they read. I believe Sandysea has, for one. I know I had a message and a follow-up telephone call but since he was too far away, we could not get together. I do agree profiles should be filled in, and I think there should be a block where the subject checks if h/she is a non-professional. Maybe the moderator should be given the power to hold a question in abeyance until a profile is filled in. I have seen some really dumb questions from people, without profiles, who begin "I have a client." Insurance client? Investor client? Maybe a barber for all I know. | |
| January 19, 2007 | |
| For blank messages, after I delete the top line in those messages, I would like them to not appear in the All Forums view. There are currently two messages like this. They no longer show in the Tax Questions and Accounting Questions views, just the All Forums view. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| Death2Taxes, I understand that a client relationship may come up once in awhile, but if someone is going to ask an involved question, we should also have the ability to decide how much research WE want to do to answer the question. I for one don't memorize code sections, but can look them up when needed. This may take me several minutes. If I know a person is really interested or it would be really helpful, I will take the time to look it up for them. If I think this is just "John no-Dough" who hasn't taken the time to fill out a profile because they are masking that they are really a DIYer, I may choose to give them a shorter "Yes" or "NO" answer. | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| LOL Sandy....I was just going to respond "4 aspirin, and call me in the morning".....it's been a long week! | |
| 19 January 2007 | |
| You are telling me???? This week has been full of misery...hehehe | |
| 20 January 2007 | |
| JR1: Rather than a Spanish / Mexican cat (Gato), I am an Italian cat (Gatto). Actually, worse, I am a Sicilian cat.
So, rather than "gracias", "grazie" will do!
| |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 20 January 2007 |
| Signore Gatto: my grazie for your suggestion #2 about preferences above. So far, so good! | |
| January 20, 2007 | |
| D&T: You know I am crossing my fingers!!!
| |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 20 January 2007 |
| Just now I disconnected the cable modem to take the laptop upstairs to try the City of Philadelphia's software on another printer......that was not a success, but when I plugged the cable back in, and booted up, I was still signed in. | |
| 20 January 2007 | |
| Hi Tim,
What do you think about PJL's idea about putting another column in the forum showing 'Original Poster'?
| |
| January 20, 2007 | |
| D&T - Disconnecting the cable modem doesn't delete the cookie file for this site. | |
| January 20, 2007 | |
| Finally, my connection has stayed on for 18 hours. I did what Senore Gatto suggested on the TA part, check the box about remembering across sections...and one other thing in IE, but not the cookie one. Stay tuned. (Hoping I stay tuned...) | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 20 January 2007 |
| Well, for a better test to see if the Signore was right, I will turn the laptop off and let the Samsonite gorillas pound it around for a bit, take it down to the bay and dunk it, then see if I am still logged in. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 20 January 2007 |
| I agree wholeheartedly with Will. | |
| January 20, 2007 | |
| Will:
There are things that I can do on my own, and there are things which need programmatical changes for. Adding the list of discussion forums to the left column was something I could do. Unfortunately, adding the original poster to the discussion forum listings is something that would require engineering changes (due to underlying database issues). Because of this, I'll have to add it to the enhancement list. I think it's a good idea though.
| |
| January 20, 2007 | |
| OK, here's the list I have so far...
[edit] Content
[edit] Forum Enhancements
[edit] Misc.
Did I get everything? Any more suggestions?
| |
| 21 January 2007 | |
| Tim: Two more suggestions:
| |
| January 21, 2007 | |
| Tim - Your answer, "If you really want to start on a new line, press enter twice, leaving a blank line between the two lines of text" does not always work, and that is what I was referring to. Quite often, I have to press enter three times to create a blank line between paragraphs. When two "Enters" don't work (about 50% of the time), and I have to press Enter three times, the message will end up with two blank lines between the paragraphs. I haven't been able to figure out why pressing Enter twice doesn't always work. | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 21 January 2007 |
| I've tried Entering twice also and it hasn't worked. Thought I just didn't understand the instructions | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 21 January 2007 |
| I agree with Deb and BL; works less than half the time if that. | |
| January 21, 2007 | |
| I just saw a post of Deb's on another topic, so I know you're not making this up now. ;-) I agree that it looks like a bug.
| |
Corptaxhelp (talk|edits) said: | January 22, 2007 |
| I always read from the 'Discussion_Forum_-_All_Topics' view. That way I can easily follow topics in multiple categories at the same time. Unfortunately, I can't see in which genre the question is asked until I click the link.
Would it be a good thing to add another column to the 'Discussion_Forum_-_All_Topics' list that displays the forum? Also, could you time-stamp the posts as well? Right now there is just a date. It would be easier to find my place if I could jump into a topic and see what has been posted since, for example, noon. | |


