Discussion:What are odds of a flat tax any time soon?
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Basic Tax Questions --> What are odds of a flat tax any time soon?
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> What are odds of a flat tax any time soon?
Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said: | 11 March 2008 |
| Hi all,
Just wanted to get some feedback/opinion on us tax pros' concerns about a possible flat tax and/or tax simplification. My fear is that after 9 years of very hard effort and finally building a good tax practice it will be all for naught at any given moment. Am i paranoid or legitemate concern? Thanks Will | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| Doesn't keep me up at night.
The 1986 "simplification" from Mr. Reagan and Mr. Rostenkowski only increased our business. | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| As long as Congress wants to legislate through taxation, we will have the present system | |
Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said: | 11 March 2008 |
| i feel relieved
thank you for your time and input !! Will | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| Will:
Think about this. No matter what system of taxation, short of a national sales tax, you still have to determine taxable income. For easy returns, yes, a tax practice could suffer if a flat tax was created. But for any return that has much more than w-2 and interest, the same questions will still apply. Even with a national sales tax, the question of sale price and the nature of items purchased for resale must be determined. I have long argued that it isn't necessarily as much the tax law that makes this business complicated as it is the nature of transactions. Having said all that, I still don't understand why one person who works double shifts at a factory, gets time and 1/2 and saves it for a rainy day should pay a higher rate of tax on any portion than another person working at the same factory regular time and "playing" on weekends. IMHO M.97CW | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| Will - I think the saying "simple taxes don't buy votes" has a lot of truth to it and we probably won't get flat taxes any time soon.
But seriously, as a profession I think we should be very careful to take the high road and enthusiastically promote a flat tax for the good of the country. We don't want to be seen as oncologists who fear a cure for cancer. We would be better off being perceived as rejoicing if cancer were cured or tax simplification were achieved. We're in a unique position to see the damage tax complexity and uncertainty does. After all, we're capable individuals and would find another way to make a living if there was less tax compliance work to do. | |
Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said: | 11 March 2008 |
| I remember working at HR Block in 1985 listening to management talk about the death of tax prep as a business. It is 23 years later (Damn I am getting old) and I believe we are further from a flat tax tahn in 1985.
Totally agree with DerekCPA odds: Zero to None! | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| Since 1986 I've been saying, another round of "tax simplification" and I'm outta here <G>. It'll be way too complicated. Another way of putting it is that "tax simplification" is an oxymoron, like "jumbo shrimp."
If by "flat tax" you mean tax at a single rate on gross income (or gross receipts), believe me, it wouldn't put tax professionals out of business. We'd still have to determine the base. In fact, the Alternative Minimum Tax is the original "flat tax." Simple, huh? It's not graduated rates that make taxes complicated, it's the base. And there will still, always, be issues in calculating the base. If you want to see how "simple" a gross receipts or gross incoome tax is, check out the Washington Business and Occupations Tax or the new Ohio, Michigan and Texas taxes. People are scrambling to figure out the new ones, and the B&O tax is anything but simple, especially as applied to the "new economy." If we went to a national sales tax, those of us who have some experience with state and local sales and use taxes would have a field day. We tend to think sales and use taxes are simple because we look at them from the consumer's point of view, but under an NST a lot more people would be sellers than are required to collect and pay over sales and use taxes to the states now. In order to raise the required amount of revenue without extremely high rates, the base would have to be much broader than the traditional sales and use tax base (generally, sales of tangible personal property unless specifically exempt, and specifically listed services) to include almost all transactions in the economy. And of course, special interests will be lined up on the steps of Congress lobbying for exemptions. Also, if you've never been through a sales and use tax audit, you have no idea how intrusive such an audit can be for a small business. No fear, it will be complicated. | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| Go to the U. S. Department of the Treasury website and look for VAT (Business Value Added Tax) and Flat (Individual) Tax news releases. Staying interested and informed about this issue is wise in my opinion. I don't think it will happen unexpectedly or overnight either, but its coming. | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| The same chances of John McCain naming Ron Paul as Secretary of State. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 11 March 2008 |
| The same chance the stimulus rebate has of working to fix the economy. | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| Americans don't understand the Fairtax, nor do the understand a VAT. It's going to be a tough sell to get this country to leave the known for the unknown. I just don't see it happening. And the Fairtax proponents are not off to a good start by trying to sell a 30% tax as a 23% tax. Is that a Metric tax? | |
| 11 March 2008 | |
| Does it make any difference that we cannot be competitive globally with the tax system we have, and that a majority of industrialized nations have a VAT and Flat tax system? Can we be the only ones who have the secret to the best way to tax? If so it is a well kept secret. | |
Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said: | 12 March 2008 |
| Hey JDdanford,
27 year unbeaten streak at Arlington H.S. football??, that is insane!! they must be on HGH all these years. thanks everyone for putting my mind at ease about flat tax. flat is a 4 letter word after all, so i wont mention it again. Will | |
| 12 March 2008 | |
| It has concerned me for years being in this industry and I can see pros and cons of both.
It would surprise me if it ever flew but you never know it is gaining steam but I think it is because people think it would be cheaper and they hear the words "No IRS" but regardless of what you call it somebody has to collect and count the money. I do hear people in my office talk about it and I explain that it is like our property taxes in that if the politicians decided to increase there is nothing we can do but pay it and at least with our current system we do have options of saving, deductions and so forth that gives a little leverage to the people.
I have been told the National Sales tax would be one of the hardest to keep up with due to all the small businesses and this is probably the hardest to enforce and collect Something else I have always wondered is that if we did have a major change like that what about all the self employed people they are going to have to report SS wages some way or another and I am not sure about ya'll but I would not be able to keep my doors open based on the small business bookkeeping, sales tax and payroll reports and these would still have to be filed For what it is worth I think it kind of like Health Care, it is an easy thing to gripe about but almost impossible to change | |
| 12 March 2008 | |
| One other thing that I have been told over the years is that the tax refunds are very big boom to the economy after the holliday season and that they would hate to see that end also | |
| 12 March 2008 | |
| Ramfan-
You make perfect sense. I also believe it will be almost impossible to change. You will notice I did not use the words "flat" or "value". They are no longer in my vocabulary, promise. | |
Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said: | 12 March 2008 |
| can we implement the flat tax just for our pain in the neck clients? | |
| 12 March 2008 | |
| Yes, tell them flatly to go away, and don't let the door bump 'em in the you know what on the way out. | |
Wkstaxprep (talk|edits) said: | 12 March 2008 |
| funny, good stuff :) | |


