Discussion:Were they as good this year?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Were they as good this year?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

15 April 2008
The questions, I mean, and the discussions? I'd rate them lower because we did not have the son of the boss or Beatle Fred but that is just my opinion.

Wwtaxes (talk|edits) said:

15 April 2008
When I look up old discussions, I find the willingness to discuss topics much better. Lately, it's more post a question, and don't dare offer input unless you know for sure it's correct. I used to feel more comfortable throwing in a comment, now I'm afraid I might have missed something somewhere, and I'm gonna get slaughtered.

TaxFlake (talk|edits) said:

15 April 2008
I didn't know those two D&T. You certainly added many good answers and I would rate you as the #1 poster for the human interest side. Lots of good posters here, good give and take, and not a lot of nasties here. I would give the board and posters a B+.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

April 15, 2008
There were less amateurs, so Kevin must have been staying at the gate.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
I do think we broke more ground last year, like Kevin's pointing out that Section 152 was not as simple as we thought, which the IRS concluded this year.

Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
There didn't seem to many really intense discussions this year. It seems that alot the DIYs posts were just a rehash of the same ole same ole and we didn't bite. Personally I read alot here but contributed very little.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
Didn't Tin Cook come on in 2007, that's a very bright spot. SouthparkCPA, and the FTF65 guy was right good on partnerhsips when you could nab the elusive fella, didn't they both come on in 2007? If I've left others out, my apologies in advance.

Tensions are up in the world at large, so tensions are up here too. Certain seeds sown in 1980 and forward are coming a cropper. We are destined to live through interesting times. I say interesting in a way that Huxley would anticipate.

Www.cpa1.biz (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
What happened to Deback, DZ, and some other usuals? I have not seen them much.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
I do agree with Joyce. I think some get worried to post, just like she says for fear of being wrong.

The great thing about forums is the ability to post wrong things, answers, ideas, concepts and then by the discussion of others, they learn something, they <and the others that didn't know> find the correct answer, boost or help someone work through their idea. pointing out pros and cons and then we'd reinforce conceptual frameworks for each other, or help mold them.

Hey, some of the really good discussions started with DIYers. They ask the questions that not all pro's know and are sometimes afraid to ask, because we are supposed to know it. I say before and I say now, I like the DIYers and we need to be more tolerant of all questions.

I know a lot of discussion focused not only on ideas and taxes, but on goofy stuff. Not really sure who starts that crap. I think it was Tom. But I do think that helped a lot of us release stress.

Anyway, I am exhausted, no time for tequila. I do think this board is awesome and I cannot wait to release some of my ideas to you folks this summer. Off to bed.

Night

Dsocpa (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
Being on my own I really appreciate this website!! Though I've done taxes for awhile as a sole practitioner I've never really gone onto this forum. Thanks to everyone who contributes. I've been a CPA for years but started doing taxes on my own after working short stints at "CPA firms" Found most don't really give that much to their clients other than a tax return and a bill they don't really want you to think just get it done and send them a bill. Many of the clients I get say they are switching because their accountant never calls them back.

I would like to mention that there were some responses that I read that were unneccessarily condesending. No one knows it all because no two clients are ever really exactly alike... Let's appreciate the diversity of responses and opinions because we all know the tax code is anything but black and white.

Kathyt (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
There's so many discussions already on here (compared to last year) that I was able to find most of my answers using search instead of asking a question. There were also a lot of times that when someone asked a question, instead of answering it, I linked it to the previous discussion on the subject. Not that we've covered all questions on this site, but we have covered a lot of questions already.

Karen258 (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
I agree with Kathy that many questions have already been answered here and a search will many times answer my questions. The problem I have are the grey areas where I can't find the answer in black & white. This is when it would be nice to have others offer advice on how they would handle it if it were their client. Then based on other's input I could make my own decision. Many of us here work on our own and don't have collegues to bounce ideas off of.

I agree with Dsocpa..."I would like to mention that there were some responses that I read that were unneccessarily condesending. No one knows it all because no two clients are ever really exactly alike... Let's appreciate the diversity of responses and opinions because we all know the tax code is anything but black and white. "

LJACPA (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
One thing that I don't understand and really don't agree with is the sometimes very sarcastic, "did you do a search" comments. I will virtually always search before asking and when I answer have decided not to state my answer(s) but to ask if my answer might be the answer. I decided to do that once I got a few criticisms and smart alek comments. I've learned more from some of these discussions than I can ever say and am grateful for the feedback and comments and even the funny, sometimes sarcastic responses and 'rabbit trails' some discussions go on. But, sometimes you'll look at a link to another discussion, and sometimes those discussions are incredibly long, tedious and off topic that they're not worth the time to read. Sometimes, sometimes isn't it okay to start a new discussion on an oft-discussed topic? We research, we read and the anything but static tax code brings about new answers/directions. I've searched and read through discussions that were two years ago and not relevant to today. Please let those of us who frequent this site and do participate sincerely, start a new discussion that's previously been discussed without being asked, "did you do a search".

Nancyshoemake (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
LJACPA - I second your motion!

Szptax (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
On my part, I am reluctant to post questions I think I should know the answer to. I do the research & will post a general question, mostly for feedback to know I am on the right track, or not. I don't always post all if the nitty gritty detail. I think many are reluctant to post because early on in the season there were very biting remarks regading researching first & posting later. DIYers were also discouraged from posting, though I agree this is not a forum for "I am doing my return in turbo tax and I don't know how to answer this question...".

Most people were very helpful & supportive.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
In the off season, I like to sometimes post questions that may just be there to generate conversation. We are all at different levels of experience and need to remember that. Sometimes it's good to rehash tax rules and law that we should know and it gives us a refresher course.

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
LJACPA,

Speaking only for myself, I try to ask people to search only if the question is one that is something along the lines of: "My client's girlfriend lives with him and has no income. Can he claim her as a dependent?" That one has been asked, answered and beaten to death. It just seems lazy to me to not look for an answer first before posting a question.

This is a great forum. But I think in some respects, computers and these types of forums have made us lazy as professionals. I often hear people say "Just Google it." We rely too much on the software to "give" us the right answer or we just pop on here post a question and get an answer. But how do we know the answer is right? My software told me that one of my clients was getting a huge refund, but my gut said something else. I was right. Wikipedia is the first source for many people in researching stuff on the Internet, but it also notoriously wrong in many cases. Kevin is correct that

Posters like Riley2, Solomon, D&T, JR1, Kevinh5, Dennis, RoyDaleOne and many others always guide you in the right direction by giving you keywords or first source information for you to expand on. Once you have that, you have the keys to find what you need.

There was a poster here who shall go nameless started dispensing advice. Something seemed strange about their advice. I asked them to put up a profile. None showed up. I asked again and again. The more they posted, the more I noticed their advice lacked something, like citations and sources and it was usually one sentence in length. Their advice was also becoming increasingly inaccurate and plain misleading. Then others noticed it. One frequent user here clued me into what might be going on and I contacted the moderator. It seems now that posted has temporarily disappeared.

Upthread, my buddy Fred mentions I bring "goofy" stuff to the board. Fine, so be it. That's part of who I am. I enjoy not taking myself too seriously. It seems he doesn't either. But I take what I do seriously.

What I would like to see here is a DIY forum and a student forum. I am not against these individuals. But we have had too many who come here thinking the Internet is a place for "free advice." As I've said, not everything in life is free. I've written about it on this forum before, I don't need to repeat myself.

I do think the discussions were a bit different this year. I tried emphatically to research my question first and bring it here after I "kicked the tires." It was refreshing for me to do that. I am a lot more confident as a result than I have been in years.

We also didn't have BeatleFred to kick around and by the way D&T, who was the "son of the boss"?

Tom

Scottycoyote (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
i was new to this site this year and i thought it was awesome. I learned alot from some of the posts, and learned how much i dont know on others lol. Besides getting new perspectives on situations as well as avenues i hadnt considered............i really like just having somewhere i can bounce an idea or situation out there and get some feedback. Thanks to taxalmanac and all the posters here

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
Tom: Remember the kid on Long Island who bitched about how much he made tho' his dad was paying him under the table in the accounting office.....right before the deadline last year?

BEGooding (talk|edits) said:

April 16, 2008
Although I'm not in a position to guage the quality of this forum as compared to previous years as I just started to actively participate mid-last year, I am thrilled to have this resource and love to contribute when I can find the time. When answering a post, I don't think people should necessarily KNOW their answer is 100% correct. Now, if paying clients were the originators of the questions, that would be entirely different. Differences of opinions and different perspectives on certain tax issues and laws can provide a good launching point for an informative and stimulating discussion.

I am happy we have such a diverse group of professionals coming together to help each other, and am pleased there is generally a level of respect in our back and forth discussions. I get a real kick out of some of the posters senses of humor and sometimes the comic relief is hilarious. I do think some of the non-tax related discussions should be relegated to the "general chat" area, particularly the postings that are heavily peppered with religious points of view or dogma.

Wwtaxes (talk|edits) said:

16 April 2008
I wanted to wait to post this, but this discussion has already started the ball rolling.

I wish I knew as much as some of the pillars of Tax Almanac, but the reality is that I don't. I'd bet that back when they first started, they didn't have all the answers either. I've been posting here since 2006, with the hope that I would get good enough to contribute on a regular basis. The tone of many posts earlier this year put me right off that aspiration. However, I came back and started posting here and there anyway, doing my best to ignore the jabs, but refusing to be drawn into a fight. If we left this forum to only those who already have all the answers, or most of them, what's the point? So I took the stance that I would plow ahead, making mistakes along the way, but hopefully learn a lot in the long run and be able to give that back. The CPA and long-time preparer I work with aren't always around to banter with, so I come here instead. If those of us in this position keep plugging away at it, maybe we'll know a lot more some day, but I encourage others to keep plodding along. For those experts correcting us, thank you, and thank you especially if you were gentle in your rebuke (Katie and D&T come to mind, but there are other kind souls out there too).

In a way, I miss some of the DIY questions, bc they were the ones I felt most comfortable contributing to. I'd like to become a master gardener some day. To do so, one must contribute volunteer time to answer gardening questions at the local farmers' market or other places. I considered the DIY questions to be like master gardener volunteer work. The were the first rung in the ladder to getting better at answering questions.

As D&T has mentioned, some non-pro questions are very interesting. I found one the other day on DPAD and software to be so. I wish we weren't so negative about taking up some of the threads of discussion and hashing out ideas sometimes. I know we're all busy, and there is probably a better way to wade through them, but I think if we pushed the search feature more, we would get rid of the repetitive questions, and be able to better focus on the more interesting questions, even if from non-pros.

Other than that, I really enjoy this forum and hope many will continue to participate. I look forward to seeing discussions in the off-season where we can focus on non-urgent topics. Thanks for all the posts.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

April 17, 2008
Last year I was working on a large forensic accounting project in March and April and didn't have as many opportunities to read the discussions, so I can't really compare them to this year. There were times, however, that I came across a thread later in the year that was helpful. I imagine the same will happen this year.

Like several others, I also felt reluctant to ask certain questions. I worked around that by emailing certain people (you know who you are, and thank you!), but I think it is unfortunate that we do not all feel comfortable asking questions. That's why this forum is here in the first place.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

17 April 2008
Of course, the fact that IRS clarified S Corp Health Insurance and the Who is a Dependent issue in early January helped. There were three or four initial discussions on these for people to refer to later, and then too, we did not have the Telephone Excise Tax issue this year. I'd like to think people took the entreaties to do some research to heart.

Szptax (talk|edits) said:

17 April 2008
but will we ever get past the prebate questions??? Now the question is - I hear I have to file to get my check but what if I am on extension, will I get my check or have to wait until next year? oy veh!

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

17 April 2008
Or the inevitable, 'is it income next year?'

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools