Discussion:Trying to house flip

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Trying to house flip

Tsponhour (talk|edits) said:

2 January 2006
Have a client who wanted to flip houses with his brother-in-law and sister. He supplied mostly labor and they the capital to buy a house and fix it up. They weren't able to sell it yet.

Should there be a Schedule C or a partnership, LLC? How would the expenses (materials, taxes, etc.) be divided? If and when they sell it would the capital gains be divided equally? Any advice will be appreciated. This may be a little to complicated for my small practice. Thanks.

DZCPA (talk|edits) said:

3 January 2006
At time of sale, I would calculate the capital gain (ignore value of labor). Divide the gain based on their written or verbal agreement. Report on Schedule D.

Sfcpa (talk|edits) said:

3 January 2006
I agree with DZ in this case if they are not business of buying and selling then there isn't any schedule C and all of the expenses get capitalized except mortage interest and re taxes. In this case I would suggest a joint venture with each using a SMLLC. The single member llc is protection for the future in case there are enviormental damages etc. In CA and in other states the environmental or other issues can be litigated back to the original owner who caused the damage so it is important to keep the llc open for several years. This is a technic used by re developers. In CA the LLC and go dormint meaning you do not have to pay the $800 just ignore the notices and do not file the tax returns for the inactive years. Then if you are sued you immediately file all the back returns and pay the back taxes and you will have an active llc and be affored the protection under it

PGattoCPA (talk|edits) said:

5 January 2006
Sfcpa:

You just advised someone to advise their client to break the tax laws by letting an LLC to go dormant via the non-filing of returns and ignoring of notices. Just because "re developers" may do this, a tax advisor should not be suggesting this as a course of action. I would hope that Tsponhour ignores this suggestion when advising his / her client.

If the client forms an LLC, then all fees should be paid, all required returns should be filed and for a tax advisor (attorney, CPA, EA, certified tax preparer or any other paid preparer) to suggest otherwise to a client is not only unethical, it opens the advisor up to malpractice claims.

Additionally, a SMLLC with an individual as the SM rarely provides the legal protection people think it does. For example, if the individual SM caused the environmental damage (Tsponhour's client "supplied mostly labor"), then the LLC will provide him no protection whatsoever.

PGattoCPA (talk|edits) said:

5 January 2006
Tsponhour:

There really is not enough information given to answer your question. Is this one of many flips the client has done with his brother-in-law and sister and this is merely the latest one? Are the properties being held for investment purposes? (Constant flipping does not constitute an investment purpose.) If so, then they very well may have a trade / business (depending upon the exact facts & circumstances) and have a de facto partnership.

If this was the first attempt, then they may not / probably do not have a de facto partnership and Schedule D treatment is probably correct.

I believe you will want to look at §761 and research materials related to the same:

BEGIN CITE

§761(a) Partnership. For purposes of this subtitle, the term “partnership” includes a syndicate, group, pool, joint venture, or other unincorporated organization through or by means of which any business, financial operation, or venture is carried on, and which is not, within the meaning of this title, a corporation or a trust or estate. Under regulations the Secretary may, at the election of all the members of an unincorporated organization, exclude such organization from the application of all or part of this subchapter, if it is availed of—

(1) for investment purposes only and not for the active conduct of a business, (2) for the joint production, extraction, or use of property, but not for the purpose of selling services or property produced or extracted, or (3) by dealers in securities for a short period for the purpose of underwriting, selling, or distributing a particular issue of securities,

if the income of the members of the organization may be adequately determined without the computation of partnership taxable income.

END CITE

As you can see, there is sufficient room for various facts & circumstances to make the answer fall one way or another. You need to determine the exact facts & circumstances of your client's situation and then make a determination.

I would gather all the information I could and then talk to some local tax advisors that have experience in this area. Posting one paragraph in TaxAlmanac and trusting any of the answers (including mine) without further research on your part would be a mistake (in my opinion).

If it is not worth your time (meaning either the client is not willing to pay you for the research or you aren't willing to do the research without getting paid) then you have to determine whether you want to take on the risk of signing a return for which you have low confidence on how everything is being reported.

BTANNER99@AOL.COM (talk|edits) said:

30 July 2007
Duplicate question deleted - user asked same thing in four different places; was answered elsewhere.

Ramcfo (talk|edits) said:

31 July 2007
Capital gain / loss treatment may preclude capitalization of some expenses such as utilites, morgage interest once property available for sale, etc. Market conditions as they are these could also potentially creat a loss situation in which case ordinary loss reported thru a partnership would produce the best result. I would defer the ultimate decision as long as possible to give you more time to make the best decision for the taxpayer.

Wwtaxes (talk|edits) said:

31 July 2007
This was a popular topic this past spring. If you haven't already, you should do some searching, as there were some good debates on this forum.

San Diego (talk|edits) said:

1 August 2007
Or you could just not file the 1040 and ignore all notices!


(joke)

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

1 August 2007
Here in MD, letting an LLC go dormant by not filing the annual report is accepted by the state as a legal way to dissolve the entity.

After a couple of years, the state deactivates the LLC unilaterally and to get it back, a "revival" process must be gone through.

All federal and state income tax returns need to continue to be filed.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools