Discussion:Testimony on the Cheap
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Testimony on the Cheap
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 27 January 2008 |
| Can you believe IRS resorted to a Wikipedia article in Tax Court?
http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/GAGLIARDI.TCM.WPD.pdf Read the companion piece in Taxprofblog: http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2008/01/tax-court-accep.html#more What a sad case, even if he won. | |
| 27 January 2008 | |
| "Truth itself is never in doubt, but it often has an elusive quality which makes the search for it fraught with difficulty.” | |
| 27 January 2008 | |
| The IRS was on pretty solid ground -- the expert witness used a standard term in mathematics where it didn't apply. That doesn't have a whole lot of relevance to his credibility or anything else that mattered to the case, though. | |
To join in on this discussion, you must first
log in.
