Discussion:Sole proprietor health insurance

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Sole proprietor health insurance
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Sole proprietor health insurance

Newarcher (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
Okay, I know....there are some that will not want to answer this question because it is something that you trained long and hard to learn and you will not give it away for free....but for the others...


What do you recommend for your sole proprietor customers (or other self-employed customers) regarding healthcare? As I see it, there are the following options:


1) Individual policy on the open market


2) HRA 105b plan


3) HSA


In all cases above:


a) The policy must be issued in the employer's name

b) Deductions for premiums (and in the case of the 105b, qualified medical expenses) are limited to the earned income of the business less 1/2 of self-employment tax and any IRA contribution.

c) The deduction for the premiums (and 105b expenses) would go on line 29 of the owner's 1040.


I have a client that is estimated to earn $40,000 net income this year ($60K gross income) and is set up a sole proprietorship. They are a member of NASE and are pushing for the 105b plan but I will admit to not knowing every detail of the plan and will have to do a little research.


I am curious to know what you all recommend to your clients....anyone care to share ideas and what you think is best? This transcends taxation considerations and gets into insurance which can be difficult to navigate. This is such a hot topic these days, the answers here will help everyone.


Thanks, Michael

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
Michael: Chief Counsel Advice 200524001 allows the policy to be in the name of the sole proprietor, not the business name, as long as there is a designation as to which business it applies. E.g, a doofus with two businesses, one running a profit and the other a loss, would blunder by having the loss business be designated.

Newarcher (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
Thanks D&T....I considered that--in my clients case--to be a minor issue anyway as it generally doesn't matter to the owner whose name it is in. Since it is himself and his wife, there is no break as far as rating for the business. In your example, though, it would be a good point. Thanks for the information.


I hope this topic takes off because it is one of those theories where there is probably not a right answer and each person's experience and opinions might ferret out a better idea than another. I am interested to see what everyone favors.


Michael

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
Understand, Michael, that I see most clients once a year, and then only by email or telephone, so they would rarely ask this question. I sometimes suggest joining outfits like the Chamber of Commerce which often sponsor lower cost group plans. When I had my corporation's health insurance in SE PA, it was through an Independence Blue Cross small group [my secretary also] and it was a cheaper and better policy than I could buy individually. I was and am a C Corp.

Newarcher (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
Right and I expect that a lot of the others will be once-a-year'ers also.


For my purposes, I would say that I am serving as more of a business coach to my clients (found a way to bill for it so why not?). I am helping them from the ground up to figure out reporting and remittance requirements, train on quickbooks, properly set up their Accounting systems, and also looking for ways to structure their business dealings to minimize their taxes. In some instances, like with the healthcare insurance, I am trying to understand their intentions and see if that is the optimum way. But with the minds on here, I figure that someone will have a good 'other' option.


Michael

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

February 4, 2008
Still waiting on your payment.......

I like the 105 if there'll be no other employees, and the spouse DOES work in the business a bit.

HSA's only make sense if the numbers work, and I haven't seen them work yet. (And the tax reporting is a friggin' nightmare!!) When insurance companies and the gov't got into bed together, you could only imagine the child born from that! And indeed, the insurance companies immediately jacked up their premiums on high deductible plans that are HSA's in relation to other high deductible plans, then want to control the money (shocking!) while banks and financial institutions are only now getting on board in realizing that they, too, can have this money....!

Newarcher (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
My payment? Refresh my memory.....


In my case, the spouse does work in the business but I am wondering if her salary might be a little low. She is working 7 hours a week to satisfy the NASE requirements and earning $100 per month. I am a little concerned that the IRS may consider a $3.57 per hour salary to be a little low. Of course, with the addition of the healthcare plan, it would up her total compensation. What guidelines do you feel comfortable with regard to the spousal salary? I would think that minimum wage would be the starting point.


Thanks,

Michael

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

February 4, 2008
My payment? Refresh my memory.....: "Okay, I know....there are some that will not want to answer this question because it is something that you trained long and hard to learn and you will not give it away for free...."

The fringe benefits are permitted to count as the comp package. Biz Plan used to have a good pamphlet on this. But if your hourly cash rate is $2/hr but her benefits add another $6, for example, she's fine.

Newarcher (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
Oh, okay I see....you interpreted that as an offer for payment. I, however, thought of that as more of an offer to not participate if there were those who might be offended by the question. See, it's all about perspective! :D ;)


I do appreciate the help and your advice. Some of these things we encounter are foreign and even with the IRS regs are grey area--evidenced by the court cases filed each year between the IRS and taxpayers. It helps to have a seasoned professional that handled a few to give some guidance.


I really appreciate your thoughts and help.


Michael

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

4 February 2008
Those HSA's are only for people with very good family genetics. Though frankly, the deductible on an affordable individual major medical policy is so high, it's hard to draw a hard and fast line to make the decision (i.e. the individual policy is itself a high deductible policy, so might was well HSA it). Do a search for HSA account, and read the Kiplinger item that will come up.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums