Discussion:Sole proprietor health insurance
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Sole proprietor health insurance
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Sole proprietor health insurance
| 4 February 2008 | |
| Okay, I know....there are some that will not want to answer this question because it is something that you trained long and hard to learn and you will not give it away for free....but for the others...
In all cases above:
b) Deductions for premiums (and in the case of the 105b, qualified medical expenses) are limited to the earned income of the business less 1/2 of self-employment tax and any IRA contribution. c) The deduction for the premiums (and 105b expenses) would go on line 29 of the owner's 1040.
| |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 4 February 2008 |
| Michael: Chief Counsel Advice 200524001 allows the policy to be in the name of the sole proprietor, not the business name, as long as there is a designation as to which business it applies. E.g, a doofus with two businesses, one running a profit and the other a loss, would blunder by having the loss business be designated. | |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| Thanks D&T....I considered that--in my clients case--to be a minor issue anyway as it generally doesn't matter to the owner whose name it is in. Since it is himself and his wife, there is no break as far as rating for the business. In your example, though, it would be a good point. Thanks for the information.
| |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 4 February 2008 |
| Understand, Michael, that I see most clients once a year, and then only by email or telephone, so they would rarely ask this question. I sometimes suggest joining outfits like the Chamber of Commerce which often sponsor lower cost group plans. When I had my corporation's health insurance in SE PA, it was through an Independence Blue Cross small group [my secretary also] and it was a cheaper and better policy than I could buy individually. I was and am a C Corp. | |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| Right and I expect that a lot of the others will be once-a-year'ers also.
| |
| February 4, 2008 | |
| Still waiting on your payment.......
I like the 105 if there'll be no other employees, and the spouse DOES work in the business a bit. HSA's only make sense if the numbers work, and I haven't seen them work yet. (And the tax reporting is a friggin' nightmare!!) When insurance companies and the gov't got into bed together, you could only imagine the child born from that! And indeed, the insurance companies immediately jacked up their premiums on high deductible plans that are HSA's in relation to other high deductible plans, then want to control the money (shocking!) while banks and financial institutions are only now getting on board in realizing that they, too, can have this money....! | |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| My payment? Refresh my memory.....
Michael | |
| February 4, 2008 | |
| My payment? Refresh my memory.....: "Okay, I know....there are some that will not want to answer this question because it is something that you trained long and hard to learn and you will not give it away for free...."
The fringe benefits are permitted to count as the comp package. Biz Plan used to have a good pamphlet on this. But if your hourly cash rate is $2/hr but her benefits add another $6, for example, she's fine. | |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| Oh, okay I see....you interpreted that as an offer for payment. I, however, thought of that as more of an offer to not participate if there were those who might be offended by the question. See, it's all about perspective! :D ;)
| |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| Those HSA's are only for people with very good family genetics. Though frankly, the deductible on an affordable individual major medical policy is so high, it's hard to draw a hard and fast line to make the decision (i.e. the individual policy is itself a high deductible policy, so might was well HSA it). Do a search for HSA account, and read the Kiplinger item that will come up. | |


