Discussion:Single Member LLC owner draws/payroll

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Single Member LLC owner draws/payroll

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2007
I have a single member LLC where the owner has put herself on payroll along with everybody else in the salon. She put herself on payroll because she does not have the self discipline to save the money for estimated taxes. She ended up paying herself $115,000 during the year through payroll and she also took owner draws to the tune of $15,000 against paid in capital of $250,000, and she is still complaining that she is poor.

For tax purposes, how do I handle the owner draws against paid in capital? Can an owner take a draw against paid in capital and not have to pay taxes on it, thereby reducing their equity in the business and deferring the tax until the liquidation or sale of the business?

How do I handle her W-2? Do I just post the income to page 1 of the 1040 and the withheld taxes to page 2 of the 1040, or do I need to put the income on the Schedule C and treat the withholding as estimated tax payments? How would I address the Schedule SE and the withheld social security and medicare if I disregard the W-2 and try to put everything on the Schedule C and Schedule SE.

Thanks

Msmith7305 (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2007
Fabs-

Please see my response in the thread you originally posted to.

Proper way out of this mess is to correct the filings of everything done incorrectly.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 25, 2007
See my reply to your other thread....

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2007
did she elect for the LLC to be taxed as a corp?

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 25, 2007
And, she's going to have penalties since she didn't pay estimates. Nothing to do about it now. She should have called a lot earlier in the year.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2007
She elected for the LLC to be a disregarded entity. If she had the taxes withheld through payroll deductions, why would she be stuck with penalties for not making estimated payments? I guess the "No harm no foul" is not observed.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2007
I should have started this thread from the beginning instead of posting this question in another thread because it is tough to keep both together. I have questions about what people have posted in the other thread, but they haven't replied to this thread yet. I apologize about trying to hijack the other thread, but I didn't think the answer was going to be this complicated.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2007
Tim Tdoyle, can you cut his question from the other thread and paste the discussion here for him? Thanks.

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Fabsroman -

The single member LLC/schedule C net profit is taxable regardless of the amount of capital put into the business or withdrawn. Draws are not deductible (nor are capital contributions income)- they are totally disregarded.

I think a good many tax preparers would consider deducting the owner's wages on schedule C along with all of the other wages, and paying taxes on the resulting net profit on the owner's form 1040. The W-2 income and withholdings would be shown on the 1040 in the normal fashion, as if they came from an outside employer. Normal Schedule SE calculations would reduce the income subject to SE taxes by the wages shown on the W-2.

This might be sticking your neck out but I've seen it done that way in the past, when a new business owner makes the same mistake your hairdresser did in their first year in business.

Treating the taxes withheld on the W-2 as estimated payments won't work because they won't match up in the IRS' system of tracking estimated payments, which is separate from their tracking of taxes withheld on forms W-2.

If you disregard the W-2, the four quarterly form 941 payroll returns would have to be amended and she would receive a refund of all of the taxes paid for herself. I know of no mechanism for applying form 941 overpayments to individual forms 1040. Also she would get federal and state unemployment taxes paid on her wages back. A corrected form W-2 showing $0 wages would need to be issued as well. She would owe a bunch of taxes with her 1040 plus some underestimation penalties.

For 2007, you should definitely fix the situation effective January 1. One option would be to take her off payroll and set her up to make quarterly estimated payments. A second option is to submit a check-the-box election, electing to be taxed as a corporation. It's likely that you would want to make the S election if you take this route. I haven't done this lately but I believe you still have time for 2007 elections. Choosing to be taxed as an S corporation just so the owner can be paid wages with taxes withheld may not be a bad business decision, especially since there are already other employees causing payroll forms to be required.

Good luck!

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Smokey, what would you do if the Sch C had a loss? The taxpayer would overpay SS tax, and get no credit on SE tax.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Thanks, that is the answer I am looking for. I'll have to look into the election to be treated as an S Corp. If I'm not mistaken, she would have to file an 1120S if she makes the election and then have the K-1 flow through to her 1040.

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Good point - in that case, it might be worth it to go through the all of the payroll tax form revisions.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
If I could figure out how to edit something, I would add this to my last post.

Regarding the draw, how does this get treated. For instance, can she take the first $250,000 out of the business tax free and just reduce pain in capital? I know that pain in capital and owner draws do not get taken into account on the 1040, but they are in Quickbooks and something has to be done with them.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
The loss on the 1040 wouldn't make a difference in this case because she paid herself $115,000, unless of course the loss is more than $20,000. Before depreciation she is showing a $5,000+ profit, so I don't think we will get there with depreciation.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
There shouldn't be a category for Paid In Capital if she is not incorporated. Quickbooks was set up wrong. It should be Owner's Capital or Owner's Draws.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Fabs, what do you mean the loss wouldn't make a difference? Medicare is part of SS/SE too. And the Office In Home deductions are limited when the Sch C has a loss.

Msmith7305 (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Fabsroman-

I apologize if my comment was viewed as rude. I sincerely did not mean it to be insulting. I also, at that time, had not read your profile. Please accept my apology.

I did, however, give you the correct answer as to how to handle the issues. Unfortunately, the mess, to be correctly handled, will be quite a lot of work. Have all the final payroll returns been filed?Ideally, you would need to correct what has been reported. She also has paid fed unemployment tax and probably a state unemployment tax she should not have.

As stated above, the draws are a non-issue as they do not reduce the net income earned on the Sched C.

Once again, I'm sorry for my brusqueness.

Good luck with this.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Okay, I used the wrong words. I meant loss on the Schedule C and it is set up as Owner's Capital and Owner's Draws according to the financial statements in front of me.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
She can take all the money out she wants tax free, because withdrawals of a sole proprietor have nothing to do with taxes.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Yep, I am a moron. Taking out cash and reducing owner's equity only affects the balance sheet, and not the income statement. I apologize to everybody about wasting your time regarding the owner draws. Now, I'll have to look into changing the election to that of an S Corp. That will be fun.

Msmith,

No apology needed. I am on a couple of other chatboards that are hobby related (e.g., hunting, fishing, shooting, and cycling) and I have been a mod on one for something like 6 years, so I know that some things don't get conveyed properly over the internet. I probably should have waited to respond to your other post until after walking the dog, eating something, and getting rid of my headache.

FlaGators (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Can someone point me to an IRC code or reg that precludes Sole Prop. or Single Member LLC shareholders from paying themsleves a salary? I also have heard of single business owners putting themselves on payroll so they wouldn't have to worry about estimated payments (which of course they could still end up being required to make est pmts). I didn't realize this was not allowed.

Thank-you!

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
FlaGator,

My wife would love you. She is a gator and I am having to live through their championships at the moment. It sucks being a terps fan. Before I met her, the Terps won the men's NCAA tournament. Since then, nothing. Well, I guess they won the women's NCAA tournament last season, but does that even count?

I am also curious to know why a sole proprietor or single member LLC owner cannot pay themselves a salary via payroll. My biggest problem with some of my clients is that they do not have money to pay their estimated taxes when they are due. It is much easier for them never to see the money. The lady I mentioned above used to make $60,000 a year working for somebody else and she would say she is poor back then. This was before she was a client of mine, and merely a family friend. Now, she doubled her income and she still says she is poor. The reason is that she spends everything she makes. She had a Lexus RX330 that was 2 years old and she had to upgrade to a new one because the other one was dirty, she wanted a new color, and she wanted navigation. She told me that it didn't cost her anything extra because her payment is still the same, but for an additional 2 years, and all she had to do was put $12,000 down on it. I could go on, but it wouldn't be worth it. I am actually scared to tell her to just take draws and we will pay estimateed taxes 4 times a year. Something tells me that come tax return time she would be crying.

I have had 1099 clients come to me with $90,000 in income and absolutely no estimated tax payments made during the year and no savings whatsoever. One client did it two years in a row, and the second year she was talking to me from Cancun on vacation as she owed the taxing authorities $25,000 from the previous year and was looking at another $25,000 for the current year, not to mention penalties and interest. After I filed her first tax return, which was in September because she filed an extension without paying any tax with the extension request, I tried to get her to cut back on spending and make estimated payments for the current tax year and monthly payments for the previous year, but that never happened. After I prepared her second tax return, her check for my invoice bounced. She didn't even own a car or a house. I didn't send her an organizer for the third tax year.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 26, 2007
Check your Cir. E for a start, but with all due respect, do some research on it Gator...but sole props and partner cannot take salary.

FlaGators (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
OK, JR1 doesn't know the answer. Anybody else?

Deback (talk|edits) said:

January 26, 2007
FlaGators - It's a known fact that Sole-Proprietors and SMLLCs (taxed as disregarded entities) are not supposed to prepare W-2 forms for themselves. They are taxed on their net income on Sch C. I have a few minutes of free time right now, so I'll try to find something in print for you.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 26, 2007
No, FLA, you misunderstand. You don't know the answer. I know the answer and don't care to look it up for you...you neither know nor care to look! Congrats by the way on FL's championship again. . .my tax attorney is from there and is enjoying every moment. ND fans are using our shirts for painting chores and changing the oil.

Deback (talk|edits) said:

January 26, 2007
FlaGators - You can read Publication 334. Notice how it always states "wages paid to your employees" and that sole-proprietors are required to prepare Sch C to report their income and expenses and Sch SE to pay the self-employment tax. I'm already bored with this and don't feel like looking anymore.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
"Wages subject to federal employment taxes generally include all pay that you give to an employee for services performed." Publication 15 p.9. Later in the same book, we find that Partners are exempt from income tax withholding, social security and medicare and Federal unemployment taxes.


For those who cannot budget, incorporate and pay yourself weekly and deposit your taxes on Form 8109-B weekly.

CATAXES (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
FLA

You cited Pub 334. Here it is... For Schedule C expenses it says "You cannot deduct your own salary or any personal withdrawals you make from the business. As a sole proprietor you are not an employee of the business."

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Bless you for having the time, CATaxes!!!

Woodstock (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Yikes - this is heated!

I have a question - please don't eat me alive.

Remember the SMLLC I was talking about on the other thread Discussion:Employer gives employee stock?

Well, this guy came to me a couple of years ago and had been set up on payroll. I do not handle his books or payroll. I just do his taxes - Sch C disregarded entity SMLLC.

Should I be advising him otherwise on the payroll situation? I mean, after all, it is costing him more money to be on payroll because of unemployment tax he pays for himself. Or should I just let sleeping dogs lie?

Again, please be gentle...:)

CATAXES (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Disregarded entity = sole proprietorship. No payroll for sole proprietor. To follow it to it's logical conclusion... Sole proprietor who issues W-2 to self would have income on Line 7, and no deduction on Schedule C (Per Pub 334). Double taxation there. Of course we'd probably find a way around that by deducting the wages on C this year and slapping his hand before next year.

FlaGators (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
In my mind here's what I was asking: I hadn't heard that before, I'd like to read more about it. Can someone off the top of their head push me in the right direction?

What you all apparently read: Can someone spend their leisure time researching this question for me? I'd prefer a detailed answer so that I won't have spend any of my own time.

In reading through a lot of these discussions it seemed to me that many of you could rattle off code sections and reg #'s like you can your own phone numbers. All I was looking for was off the top of someone's head to say, "take a look at...."

Instead I get lectured from the person voted "Top Contributor to the Board". So yeah, I got a little ticked. And I had already spent time trying to find the answer myself but failed. So I asked what I beleive was my first question here.

But don't worry, for now on I'll lurk in the shadows (like a gator).

Deback (talk|edits) said:

January 26, 2007
Woodstock - I would tell him not to treat himself as an employee and that his income and expenses are reported on Sch C, with no W-2 and other payroll forms required for himself--and that he should pay quarterly estimated taxes, instead of withholding tax and SS tax as an employee.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
Elizabeth, what does he do with his expenses? Put them on Sch C; if so he overpays Social Security.


As for the other thread running here, where's my white flag?

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 26, 2007
Hey Fl..relax, the smiling doesn't come thru, which is why I was blowing some warm air re: your team's success. And I did point you to Cir. E...sorry if I annoyed you unnecessarily...'til next time, then.

Woodstock (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2007
DT - Yeah - all expenses go on Sch C - but his salary and the payroll taxes are being treated as a deduction on the Sch C (along with all his other employees)...

Deb - Yes, of course. It will save him some money anyway. I am not sure why he was set up like this in the first place, but going forward for 2007, I will advise him to stop the payroll on himself.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

27 January 2007
Elizabeth: read to him CATAXES citation from Publication 334 above.

FlaGators (talk|edits) said:

27 January 2007
JR1, maybe it's that '92 Sugar Bowl where Jerome Bettis and your Irish thumped my Gators that got to me. (I think '92)

It's all good - I appreicate your reply!

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

January 27, 2007
We won a bowl game? I don't even remember....been so long. . .no wonder that tax attorney hates me.

Woodstock (talk|edits) said:

27 January 2007
DT - Dang. SO, I guess I have a couple of amendments to do, and make sure he's stopped paying himself in 2007. Thanks for clarifying.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

27 January 2007
Hold on a minute, Elizabeth! All he has done is lower the Sch C profit by the wages, but raise it back when he picks it up on Line 7. He is getting to deduct the employer's share of SS on his own wages as a Sch C business expense, thus lowering SE tax, but this is minor for if you remove both W2 and wage deduction on Sch C, his share of the increased SE Tax will be deducted but not as a Sch C Expense. Boggles my mind.

Woodstock (talk|edits) said:

27 January 2007
DT - OMG. You are right. I'm confused, but I'm not. Is that possible? I need a drink.

Fabsroman (talk|edits) said:

30 January 2007
Just had a discussion with my client about changing the LLC's selection from that of a disregarded entity to that of a S Corporation, and that was rather tough. I think I lost her about 1 minute into the entire conversation. I am going to have to talk to her about it some more the next time I see her. That should be fun. She is having a hard time understanding why she cannot be on payroll without electing to be taxed as a S Corporation, and she does not fully understand the benefit of not having to pay FICA and Medicare if she only takes a reasonable salary out of the company.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums