Discussion:Self employed with part time job and home office

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Self employed with part time job and home office
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Self employed with part time job and home office

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Client is self employed and has a home office.

One day per week he drives to a W-2 generating job in the same profession as his self employment activity.

He does have a home office for his self employment activity.

Can we deduct the miles driving to the W-2 job?

Thanks.

KathiJud (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
I believe those would be commuting miles and non deductible.

Douglasholbrook (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Actually, you're driving from one job location to another so it IS deductible. The question is whether the SE business deducts it or you have to put it on the 2106.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
it would NEVER go on the Sch C

and would only go on the 2106 depending on whether the person actually worked both locations the same day (perhaps with only one way being deductible).

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Is there *one* trade or business or *two*?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
*why* would that matter? One job pays a W-2 to the *employee*. The business pays net profit to the *proprietor*.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Harry raises an interesting issue. In my area, freelance musicians receive W-2 forms from one contractor and 1099s from others. They have no control over how they are paid, or very little. One semi-major orchestra even went from having a combination of employees and subcontractors to putting all on 1099s, and this was contested by the Musician's union. At least one person filed an SS-8 with no results.

The City of Philadelphia's regulations consider someone who plays for a contractor to be the employee of that contractor, even if they do not withhold the wage tax.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
while that's interesting, DT, it doesn't change the fact that expenses allocable to being an employee are employee business expenses, while expenses allocable to being in your own business are Sch C deductions.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
If the taxpayer has only *one* trade or business [which he pursues as a sole proprietor Monday through Thursday, and as an employee on Friday] I see *no way* he can be denied the mileage deduction...

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Harry - Actually, that's exactly the case. Client is a music teacher, teaching both at a school plus for private clients.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
The problem is that where he works is his office as applies to the home office deduction and mileage deductions appertaining thereto, but a home (and not a business location) as applies to the W-2 job. So, it's commuting.

I am assuming that the day he devotes to his W-2 job, he teaches no private lessons.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Rev. Rul. 99-7:

"Finally, Rev. Rul. 94-47 amplifies Rev. Rul. 190 and Rev. Rul. 90-23 to provide that, if the taxpayer’s residence is the taxpayer’s principal place of business within the meaning of § 280A(c)(1)(A), the taxpayer may deduct daily transportation expenses incurred in going between the taxpayer’s residence and another work location in the same trade or business, regardless of whether the other work location is regular or temporary and regardless of the distance. .......

"If an office in the taxpayer’s residence satisfies the principal place of business requirements of § 280A(c)(1)(A), then the residence is considered a business location for purposes of Rev. Rul. 90-23 or Rev. Rul. 94-47. In these circumstances, the daily transportation expenses incurred in going between the residence and other work locations in the same trade or business are ordinary and necessary business expenses (deductible under § 162(a))."

Blrgcpa (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
It doesn't go on the 2106 or sched c. It's not a business expense or employee expense. The drive from job 1 to job 2 is a misc expense on sched a.

That's assuming that he works both jobs on the same day.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
D'oh! Well, if you're going to pull out the law on us, that takes the sport out of it.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Being an employee is a trade or business when it comes to Section 179.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
There's some of us that have to face the music. I ask that my analysis be stricken from the record.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Smokeytax wrote: "Harry - Actually, that's exactly the case. Client is a music teacher, teaching both at a school plus for private clients."

I'm going to stay with my conditional "if...then" about one or two trades or businesses. You'ld be surprised what the IRS might think about two versus one... Remember when IRS held that being a "teacher" wasn't the same trade or business as being a "teacher"...?

I have a strong intuition that if the IRS had already addressed this issue favorably, *all* of us would already know about it. Continue the search.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

5 October 2009
Reminder to all: The question is whether the mileage is deductible, not *where* it's deductible. One question at a time, please. Refrigpbrerator.

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

6 October 2009
Death&Taxes - thanks for that quote.

I think there is an argument that the W-2 activity is a trade or business, and in fact the same trade or business as is shown on the schedule C. As the great tax commentator Abe Carnow says, "just read the words" in the tax law . . .

But, if the driving is deductible because the schedule C and W-2 activities are the same business, why don't we have all of our clients with W-2 income simply do a bit of consulting work out of their homes, making their commute deductible?

I think I'm going to end up advising the client that the driving to the W-2 job is a nondeductible commute.

The last thing I want is for the IRS to try to claim that some (perhaps a prorata share) of his other business deductions are allocable to the W-2 job and only deductible on schedule A, which would be a total disaster.

Not trying to make the argument that it's one single business makes sense in this case.

Great discussion. Thanks to all - I really appreciate all of the points of view.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

6 October 2009
I have had at least a half-dozen audits of freelancers who also teach and never had a problem with the approach that allocates the mileage for each 'gig' to the type of income. From the days of Drucker [1], courts have done an almost Soliman-like analysis of the musician's place of business [note the first words of the Appellate decision: 'practice, practice, practice']. Of course, this can be argued, but if the musician also teaches students in the home, the case for home being place of business is even stronger.

The same rationale applies to work dues [it is really odd to see a pay stub for a 1099 with union work dues deducted], and travel costs.

The more difficult question is allocation of other expenses that can not be identified by 'gig' such as purchase of sheet music, instrument supplies and repairs [anyone who has a client that plays a reed instrument like an oboe knows of cane, reeds etc and the money spent on them], continuing education in form of lessons, concerts, and other items peculiar to the musician. These I allocate based on percentage of income. If 40% is on a 1099, 40% are on the Schedule C, 60% on 2106. Generally I put all the expense categories on one of the two schedules and then make a one line deduction to carry the allocation to the other schedule, rather than retype the various categories.

These returns can be very involved: a couple that lives in Middlesex County NJ had 25 W-2 forms and 34 1099s this year, plus other income not reported on 1099s....sad thing is they make little money....gross before expenses was less than 115,000. Major orchestra players earn more than that from one job, and do not have to drive all over creation.

Smokeytax (talk|edits) said:

6 October 2009
Wow, Death&Taxes - what a challenge. Love the practice practice practice reference.

Issues of state returns must be fun as well!

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

6 October 2009
Smokey: I would add that each musician is different. I have several members of our major symphony who also play in numerous quartets and other groups and gross perhaps 20-25% of the W-2 amount from these activities. In these cases, I have looked at time spent at each activity to allocate some costs, like depreciation of instruments, repairs and supplies. It is amazing to me that some of these people have any time for a regular life with their spouses or children, but I think that is one reason I often see musician couples.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.