Discussion:Sec 179 C/O for LLC converting to S-Corp

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Sec 179 C/O for LLC converting to S-Corp

Brensan (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
I have a client that has a 2005 NOL, so their Sec 179 deduction is a carryover to next year. We have timely filed the Entity classification election, and the S-corp election for 2006. My question is do I mark the LLC for 2005 as final, or does the C/O for the Sec 179 deduction just simply carryover to the S-Corp? (I know it's all passthrough) I've had many LLC/S-corp conversions, but none so far that had carryovers. Please help!

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
The S. 179 is on the personal anyway, so no worries. It should end up there.

Brensan (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
Well, that's why I'm confused. On my other partnerships, the section 179 deduction does pass through on the K-1, but they all have a profit. This is a brand new LLC (1065 ptr return), and they have a $12,000 loss. Nothing is showing up under S-179 on the K-1 and it's listed as a carryover. I use Lacerte, what am I doing wrong?

WillyB (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
Sec 179 deductions can be limited at the pass thru entity level, as well as individual level. I am assuming that is what Brensan has.

I have not had this situation, but I believe it would go like this: a "conversion" from LLC or partnership to a corporation is actually a liquidation to members, followed by contribution of all the assets and liabilities into a new corporation, or alternatively, contribution of all the LLC interests into the new corporation, and then ,constructively, by the fact of all interests being owned by one person (the corporation), or by actual actions, the LLC is dissolved and all the LLCs assets and liabilities go to the Corporation.

What is effect of each alternative on suspended sec 179 deductions? I don't know for sure offhand, and will let others verify or correct me.. But, I would guess that the suspended deduction passes through to members (or member) upon dissolution of the LLC.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
Ah, wondered about that. So the S179 is stuck inside the 1065 and not hitting the K1. Well, that's a problem indeed. I wonder if, when you transfer to S next year, and I'm assuming that we can convert a 1065 to an S..wait, let me see if that's true in ProSeries...well, shoot, that isn't an option. Surely there's a carryforward schedule where you can enter the previously unallowed S179 deductions, since by definition, everything just rolls over to the S...

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
No, Willy, this would be a 751 reorg...there's no liquidation and recontribution. Just like rolling from a sole prop to a corp.

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
From a purely theoretical viewpoint (which means I don't know either) I like Willy's analysis. The intent of check the box has to favor seamless transition of all attributes.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
You're entitled to your opinion Dennis.

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
DISCLAIMER: You are using this website at your own risk. Intuit Inc. is not responsible for any content on this website and does not endorse it. Individual Intuit employees and unaffiliated users of this website contribute and edit content that they think is of interest to the community. Nothing herein constitutes tax or legal advice.

WillyB (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
I have wondered exactly what the "check the box" regs did , in a technical manner. I was off doing s/g when they came out and have never really sorted that out. It is germaine to this situation.

As I said, when you go from a partnership to a corporation, it is not some magic transformation. I believe you still have to look at the steps required to get there: one of the two methods I mentioned above, with the tax effects of the alternative methods.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
Add this to the reason to not use the STUPID check the box idea. If you want a corp. then incorporate! Feeling better now...

Brensan (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
Well - JR - when you have clients come in that were already set up as an LLC by their lawyer who didn't bother to find out that they intended on paying themselves a salary and withholding payroll taxes... then I have to convert them to an S-corp. When my clients come to me first for advice, I almost always advise them to either set up a C-corp or S-corp.

Brensan (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
I really appreciate all of your opinions (& disclaimers!) JR, Willy, & Dennis. I'm leaning toward the 751 reorg. and not liquidation, etc. I will just enter the carryforward manually while setting up the new S-Corp. Thanks again:-)

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
Yeah, I understand Brensan. I've been fortunate to not have one of those yet, and when it happens...arghhh, how to resist the temptation to get them to the S easily by just checking the little box and away you gooooo. Just so many unsettled things in my mind at that point, discussed at length in a thread a few weeks back. I think I'd really be tempted to throw down $200 or whatever it costs for the internet inc'ing services just to make all things clear. This could be a seminar topic all of its own.

Nola999 (talk|edits) said:

6 April 2006
FYI, you don't have to check the box anymore. Just file a 2553 and the change from 1065 default to corp is automatic. An IRS agent confirmed this, in case you are wondering.

Up until last summer sometime, you had to file both. Problem was if you mailed them in at the same time, to two different addresses, per the instructions, you could have problems.

I had a new client who's attorney filed these forms. IRS received the "check the box form" sorry, can't seem to remember the number. IRS granted C Corp status. Before the change got entered into the IRS computer, the 2553 arived at a different IRS office and was denied because the "check the box form" hadn't been filed. Result, C Corp holding real estate.

Because the attorney entered the wrong date, 1-1-04 instead of date of incorporation, 4-1-04, corp status was denied for 2004 because it was late. C Corp went into effect for 2005. You can't unelect "check the box," because it wasn't from inception of the corp. My only recource was to file a late 2553 and get S Corp status when I would much rather have had a 1065.

WillyB (talk|edits) said:

7 April 2006
Brensan: Per Reg Sec. 301.7701-3(g)(1) provides that an election by a partnership to be classified as association (read Corporation) is deemed to have contributed all its assets and liabilities to the (corp) in exchange for stock and (is deemed ) to liquidate and have distributed the stock to its partners.

Reg Sec 1.179-3(f) provides that upon a disposition of property in a tranasaction in which gain or loss is (not recognized).. the basis of such property is increased... by (the amounts of suspended) Sec 179 deductions in respect of which, the property basis was formerly reduced.

Brensan (talk|edits) said:

7 April 2006
Thanks WillyB. I will try & read this again tomorrow when I am not so sleepy (it's not sinking in right now). So far, it makes sense for Ptrship to Corp, but I'm not quite sure how this would apply to S-Corps. Like I said, maybe I should just go to bed for now & re-visit it tomorrow. Thanks!

Caryncpa (talk|edits) said:

8 October 2008
C Corp converts to an S corp. I have unused section 179. Can I carry them forward to an S Corp?

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

9 October 2008
Absolutely not. See Internal Revenue Code ยง 1371. Consider revoking the Section 179 election.

Caryncpa (talk|edits) said:

9 October 2008
Are they talking about Section 179?
It is not specific. I am aware of net operating loss carry overs will be lost

Sec. 1371. Coordination with subchapter C

   (a) Application of subchapter C rules
     Except as otherwise provided in this title, and except to the
   extent inconsistent with this subchapter, subchapter C shall apply
     to an S corporation and its shareholders.
   (b) No carryover between C year and S year
     (1) From C year to S year
       No carryforward, and no carryback, arising for a taxable year
     for which a corporation is a C corporation may be carried to a
     taxable year for which such corporation is an S corporation.
     (2) No carryover from S year
       No carryforward, and no carryback, shall arise at the corporate
     level for a taxable year for which a corporation is an S
     corporation.

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

11 October 2008
This covers 179 also.

Harry Boscoe (talk|edits) said:

11 October 2008
And what's a section 751 incorporation anyway? If you're paying $7.51 for your incorporations, you're paying at least double! I get my incorporations for only $3.51....

Dkorenic (talk|edits) said:

16 February 2009
I've read this entire link and am still wondering what the correct answer is. Is the correct answer

"Per Reg Sec. 301.7701-3(g)(1) provides that an election by a partnership to be classified as association (read Corporation) is deemed to have contributed all its assets and liabilities to the (corp) in exchange for stock and (is deemed ) to liquidate and have distributed the stock to its partners. Reg Sec 1.179-3(f) provides that upon a disposition of property in a tranasaction in which gain or loss is (not recognized).. the basis of such property is increased... by (the amounts of suspended) Sec 179 deductions in respect of which, the property basis was formerly reduced" ? Does this infact apply to S-Corps as well as C-Corps?

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.