Discussion:Sales & Use Tax Liability Discovered
From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> General Chat --> Sales & Use Tax Liability Discovered
| 1 May 2008 | |
| Has anyone dealt with a Sales & Use Tax liability resulting in several years’ worth of delinquent ST-3/ST-389 in South Carolina? | |
| 1 May 2008 | |
| I prepared internal documents to calculate the overall liability & the company owner chose to have his accountant submit the delinquent returns based on the internal calculations to the DOR because he is a CPA and I am not. To my knowledge, because the company began filing in March this year, the past 36 months worth of information should have been submitted. The accountant submitted returns for 44 months & I don't understand why, nor will he explain why he did this along with submitting the internal documents containing projected future liability. What is the reasoning behind submitting more information than is required? | |
| 2 May 2008 | |
| DW,
I don't have experience with South Carolina, but I can't for the life of me understand why you would submit projections, unless asked. But 44 months when only 36 were due? Doesn't sound right. I one time had to submit returns for a company that didn't submit returns for 2 years worth sales taxes. Now they had sporadic sales, maybe every couple of months (consulting company that sold computer equipment as a side business) but we just gave them what they wanted. There must be a reason. Tom | |
| 2 May 2008 | |
| "Nor will he explain?" Why not have his client, who is also your client, write a letter and send it to him certified, asking (demanding?) for him to explain? | |
To join in on this discussion, you must first
log in.
