Discussion:SP Bank Loan now assumed by S-Corp - S/H Loan?

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Accounting Questions --> SP Bank Loan now assumed by S-Corp - S/H Loan?

Dude7707 (talk|edits) said:

29 July 2009
SP initially took out $10k signed by him. Now SP is changing to S-corp and want's 10k to be assumed by S-corp since a promissory note will be issued. What is correct recording on S-Corp Books?
 Dr.  S/H - Contributions
   Cr.  Loan from S/H

Future payments from S-Corp paying down bank loans will be recorded as:

 Dr  Loan from S/H
 Dr  Interest Expense
   Cr  Cash

Is this correct.....

MWPXYZ (talk|edits) said:

31 July 2009
SP? If SP is the stockholder I guess debit stockholder loan and credit bank loan. Payments include debits to loan account and interest expense.

Or if SP is Special Purpose Entity changing to S corporation, there would be no entries.

Dude7707 (talk|edits) said:

31 July 2009
SP - Sole Proprietor which is now a shareholder in the newly formed S-Corp.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

July 31, 2009
Is there positive equity?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

31 July 2009
do note the effect or lack of effect on basis in the s corp

Dude7707 (talk|edits) said:

1 August 2009
Will determine and follow up. Some of my assoicates claim this cannot be done, since T/P persoanlly guaranteed the bank loan and S-Corp making payments would constitue a distributions which as JR1 and Kevinh5 I assume are referring to since this being a taxable distribution if not having sufficient basis Yes?

Rkrcpa1 (talk|edits) said:

3 August 2009
Maybe I'm just a little slow today but I don't get the initial entry. Why are you putting the loan on the books? Why are you debiting S/H Contributions? Wouldn't a "S/H Contribution" be a credit of some sort to the Equity section? What asset accompanies the loan?

MWPXYZ (talk|edits) said:

6 August 2009
I believe 99%+ of loans to my client's S corporations have been guaranteed by the stockholders. It normally should not be a problem to add an S corporation as a borrower; and if collateral is included, normally no a problem to change the borrower to the S corporation.

But perhaps banks/finance companies are not following normal procedures nowadays.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.