Discussion:Question about deducting tools for work...
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Question about deducting tools for work...
| 3 January 2007 | |
| Hello,
In year 2006 my gross income was 22,000 dollars even and I have a total of about 10,000 dollars in reciepts (retail and eBay) for tools (tools make up the bulk of the reciepts), service manuals, steel toe boots, gloves etc. that I have purchased during the year. As far as I can tell, I will be audit bate if I claim it all...which I would like to do. Any suggestions as to how I should go about my preparing my taxes, avoid audit etc. etc. would be appreciated. Thanks | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| Nobody in particular. I read that excessive deductions (30% or more of AGI) will likely lead to an audit. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| as long as you can proof your deductions and maintain good details records including your income sources, even if you get audited you should be okay. Is this your first here in business? Are you filing schedule " C ". | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| This is my first time doing anything other than a 1040EZ...
I am filing a 1040, Schedule A and a 2106 (at least I think those are the right forms for my situation). This is strictly a personal income tax return. These are tools, manuals etc. that I bought to do my job (mechanic, rebuilder) and to take care of and maintain equipment at work (forklift, parts washer, air compressor etc). Does the IRS only look at reciepts to show that you bought what you say you bought or do they also pick you apart and question the purchases and / or show up at work to see the tools?? | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| are you getting a 1099-misc from your customer(s)? If you are self-employed (it looks like you are one) you need to file Schedule " C " and not form 2106.
In schedule " C " you will report your income of $ 20,000 and all the expenses related to that income. You mentioned schedule " A" . Are you own a house? Do you have Mortg. Interest? if so how much? Taxes ? | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| Why worry about audits?
http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:How_Many_Audits_Did_You_Have_in_2006%3F | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| I am not self employed.
I do not own a house. No Mortg. interest. I use these tools while working for someone else. | |
| January 3, 2007 | |
| I'm assuming you will be receiving a W-2 form as an employee. If you are audited (which you have less than 1/2 of a percent chance), the auditor will want to add up your receipts for the tools. So, keep your receipts, don't worry about being audited, and don't worry about an auditor showing up at your work to look at your tools. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| I will be recieving a W2.
I get the impression that I am being paranoid over nothing... I guess what I am worried about is an auditor looking at the reciepts and accusing me of deducting tools that I am using for my own personal use and not for work and then hitting me with a big fine... | |
| January 3, 2007 | |
| How often do you use your tools for personal use? Do you do any "under-the-table" repair business out of your garage at home or elsewhere? | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| IF you are getting a 1099-misc for $ 20,000 you must report that income on schedule " c" . If you are getting a W-2 then report the income on line 1 of the 1040 under Wages & salaries. If you are not sure consult a local CPA trust me it's all worth it paying a tax professional if you worry about getting audited.
Good Luck | |
| January 3, 2007 | |
| Mauro - He's told you three times that he's not self-employed. Read the above thread in its entirety. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| No "under-the-table" jobs.
They get no use on my personal vehicle either. I have other tools at home for that. However, the IRS has to have a way of weeding out those who abuse the program and I am worried about getting tagged. And does the "less than 1/2%" rule apply to those who deduct 45% of their gross income? | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| EDIT
...worried about getting tagged AND getting accused of deducting tools that I am using for my own personal use and not for work and then hitting me with a big fine | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| Deback I just read now that his getting a W-2. I looks like that you are better off taking the standard deduction $ 5,150 for single and married filing separate, $ 7,550 for head of household and $ 10,300 for joint filers and qualifying widow(er)s.
Also you are entitled to the personal excption which when up to $ 3,300 for 2006. There is a phase out exemption but doens't apply to your case here. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| "Also you are entitled to the personal excption which when up to $ 3,300 for 2006."
Whats that and why is that better? Is there an IRS form that explains it? | |
| January 3, 2007 | |
| Well, for one thing, you won't end up deducting the full $10,000 on Sch A. If you're single, the standard deduction is $5,150. On Sch A, under Misc Deductions, 2% of your gross income ($440) will be subtracted from your work deductions of $10,000, so that leaves a net deduction of $9,560. Assuming you have no contributions or any other substantial itemized deductions (I'm not including your state and city withholding tax here, because this is just a simple example), your itemized deductions will exceed the standard deduction by only $4,410. Secondly, your tax bracket will be 15% (still assuming you are single with no dependents), so the federal tax savings on $4,410 will be $662. This is not enough for the IRS to haul you in for an audit. Normally, from what I've heard in the past, they want to be able to collect $1,000 or more when they do audits. I heard that many years ago, so I have a feeling that amount is higher now.
So, don't worry. If you're claiming your income from all sources, and if your only source of income is from being a mechanic for an employer, you can deduct your tools and other necessary work expenses on Sch A, under Miscellaneous Deductions. | |
| January 3, 2007 | |
| 12string - The personal exemption of $3,300 is in addition to the standard deduction (or itemized deductions, if you have more than the standard deduction). Disregard Mauro's answers. He's either not paying attention or is not qualified to answer your question. You don't need any more confusion at this point. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| Deback thanks for your compliment but for your information if the 12string is so concerned about getting audited and it seems to me that he has hard time getting his receipts to proof his deductions , I would reccomend the standard deduction based on the facts presented. However, not knowing all the facts but instead in pieces its better for a person to has only $ 20,000 in income and paid federal and state taxes on his earned income from his W-2 to avoid the trouble of not spleeping at night of wondering if the IRS will audit his return. Also, the chance of getting audited as DZCPA mentioned above is very small. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| I am single and I can only claim myself.
I understand the personal exemption...he made an error while spelling and that threw me off and peaked my interest. So, the IRS does not audit when there is less than 1000 dollars to be gained unless there are conflicting dollar figures regarding the income of the tax payer or there are other reasons to believe that the tax payer earned more than he/she claims? Would it be to my advantage to include a "statement" explaining my deductions seeing as how I have never deducted before and my deductions are not "proportionate" to my income?? | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| 12string don't worry.You don't need to include no statements except what's required by the IRS. | |
| January 3, 2007 | |
| The IRS would mainly be concerned with how you supported yourself (rent, utilities, groceries, etc). If you're living with someone who pays the monthly bills, then you would have even less to worry about.
| |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| 12 string, You are too paranoid to file your own tax return. Do you really think out of 500 taxpayers, your return will get selected? Have a professional help you do the job right. If I was too paranoid to drive a car...I'd take the bus. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| 12string, if you do decide to deduct your job related expenses (as it would seem you are entitled to), you might want to take a look at a recent court case Nicely vs Commissioner (http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2006/08/tax_court_boots.html). | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 3 January 2007 |
| Great cite, Wayne. That means I can't deduct my steel-toed Red Wings that I used to boot unruly clients out of my office. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| I love the end of that case--taxpayer argues he is entitled to deduct cost of Rocky Wolverine boots, but admits at trial he is wearing Rocky Wolverine boots. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| 12string.. You have a lot of issues, and I would suggest that you have a professional prepare your return, at least for the first year. They can visit with you on record keeping, and ins and outs of being self employed. I think that it will be money well spent, and will save a lot of money, and time in the future.... | |
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 3 January 2007 |
| 12String - I wouldn't worry...the Federal Prisons are full of people that have tried to do what you want to.
- Rick | |
| January 3, 2007 | |
| PJL - 12string is NOT self-employed. He has one issue. He wants to deduct his mechanic tools on Sch A but is afraid he might be audited. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| Did anyone else think of that spazz kid from South Park when they read this? Just me? | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| This thread is like one of those games where you add a word to a sentence whispered in your ear, then whisper the new sentence to the person next to you. The end result is not the sum of its inputs. :) | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
Deback, Thanks for pointing that out! When I go back (way back) and read original post, doesn't look like he's self employed. But somewhere in this post we seem to have gotten off track. Sorry:(
LOL San Diego and Will, what were we talking about again??? (going to be a long season)...We're thinking too hard..... | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 3 January 2007 |
| I just re-read this entire post and I kept waiting for someone to type: "Badges, we don't need no stinkin' badges." ;) From his handle, 12String actually sounds like someone doing instrument repairs and rebuilding in a music shop. | |
| 3 January 2007 | |
| Badges, we don't need no stinkin' badges......Hope I made your day D&T.....(Must be heavy metal, if he needs steel toed boots) :) | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| Wow...
For the record, no I am not self employed. I guess I wont be trying to deduct MY steel toe boots...they ARE suitable for non-work use (thanks for the link). No I do not work on musical instruments. I work on transmissions...I rebuild them. I also work on other pieces of equipment that we have in the shop (parts washer, forklift etc). My one big question that would answer all of my questions is this: How does the IRS decide what is a legitamite "unreimbursed employee expense" and what is not when it comes to tools? They don't just take your word for it do they? Because if thats the case it would be EASY to take advantage of the system. The ONLY thing that I am "worried" about is an auditor looking at my deductions without knowing what I do on a day-to-day basis (how COULD he/she know?) and thinking that I am trying to deduct personal items...which is not what I am doing. If all they do is add up reciepts, then I am fine. I have all of them. Most of the tools are hand tools that everyone in a shop uses, but some of them are the kinds of thing that are only common for an electrician, something that I am not and thus THOSE tools do not fit my job description. I use them to fix and maintain the equipment in the shop that I described. Maybe I am worrying too much. But with a $20,000 gross income and $10,000 in misc. deductions I have a hard time believeing that I WONT throw a red flag. | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 4 January 2007 |
| 12string - I think you're a little too worried about this. Virtually all mechanics own their own tools and the big expense is the first year when you have to purchase all that stuff. You'll always be buying new and improved tools (that's why the Snap On guy drives a truck that comes to your shop every week and provides "friendly credit terms"). On the VERY off chance that you're audited (which I really don't see), you've got the receipts. Worse case scenerio - invite the auditor to the shop to see you work. Believe me, the auditor doesn't want to get dirty and greasy! | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| I agree w/ Bottom Line. Provided you keep adequate records, you should be entitled to deduct your employment-related tools that are ordinary & helpful in your trade. This means you should keep your receipts and perhaps document in writing the business purpose of your major tools. If you read the court case linked above, you'll note its best to document the business purpose near the time of purchase (as opposed to the time of audit!).
But keep in mind you might not be entitled to deduct all $10,000+ of your tools in one year anyway. Presumably some of the tools will have a "useful life" of more than one year--in which case you will have to depreciate the tools over that period rather than deduct all $10,000 in 2006. | |
Taxsolution (talk|edits) said: | 4 January 2007 |
| 12 sting, Hey if you are so worried getting audit. Just take the standard deduction. Look if some how you are so lucky and got an audit, remember they will probably have you on their list. In the future you might be more prone to get an audit. So do you want to take that chance for a little gain? | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| Taxsolution, the standard deduction would be significantly less than 12 String's itemized deductions, assuming his AGI really is around $22,000. I think taxpayer should take the deductions he is entitled to in this case. | |
Taxsolution (talk|edits) said: | 4 January 2007 |
| True Bengoshi, I agree but it seems like 12sting is so afraid about getting an audit. So I just want him to be aware that for a few hundreds gain (using deback assumption above)maybe it will be better for him to just take standard and forget about it. Because a worried mind is not worth a few hundred bucks. on the other hand, if 12sting is a bit more daring then, I agree take the deduction and save yourself some money. Remeber 12sting, if you get an audit in your case, you are pretty lucky individual. lol | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| haha...I see what you're saying Taxsolution. I guess for some people, the restless nights aren't worth it even though they would likely prevail in an examination. | |
Taxsolution (talk|edits) said: | 4 January 2007 |
| yes right on bengoshi | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| No restless nights here. This is just something that I have been thinking about off and on over the past few weeks since I realized just how much I have spent this year on tools.
I would rather DEDUCT than DEPRECIATE because it is not likely that I will ever spend more than the standard deduction in one year because almost all of the tools have a lifetime warranty. As far as I can tell, if I spread out the deduction via depreciation I will lose deductability value unless I continue to spend large amounts. I only have one tool that cost over $1000 and thats a $1199 Fluke Scopemeter (common electician tool that I use at work that does not seem to fit my job title well). I read in another topic on here that is it rare if not unheard of to depreciate items valued at less than $1000. And I am not really that worried about GETTING AUDITED. I am more so curious about what exactly the auditor will do and look for in my return. Taken from Bengoshi's post, "Provided you keep adequate records, you should be entitled to deduct your employment-related tools that are ordinary & helpful in your trade." I would really like to know how that is determined... Also taken from Bengoshi's post, "This means you should keep your receipts and perhaps document in writing the business purpose of your major tools" Is there a formal way to do this or do I just write something down on a blank sheet of paper?? | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| 48 replies on this simple question. 12string, You are close to setting a record here. If you get audit, take all those wonderful tools to the IRS meeting and show the agent how to use them. No need to write a book about them. | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| Thanks for the wonderfull contribution Mr. DZCPA.
One thing that I have been trying to get at and have yet to get a GOOD response on - although I have gotten many other good responses regarding other matters, but not from you - is this: How does the IRS decide what is a legitamite "unreimbursed employee expense" and what is not when it comes to tools? Sorry if many responses to a single thread offends you or anyone else. It was not my intention to offend. Good day. | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| 12String, sorry if I confused you. Generally speaking, when you purchase an tool used in your trade you that you reasonably expect will not be thrown away/wear out within one year from the date of purchase, you would deduct the cost of the tool over its useful life (e.g., you might deduct the cost over 5 or 7 years rather than all in one year).
However, even if this applies to your situation, as Deback pointed out you can ELECT to deduct the costs of the tools all in one year rather than over several years (this is often referred to as the "Sec 179 election"). That's probably what you'll want to do. You must make the Sec 179 election on Form 4562, Part I. Also note the property has to be used more than 50% for business use which I assume you meet. What I meant by "ordinary & helpful" is that you can deduct via Sec. 179 election the cost of tools that are commonly acquired by other in your profession/trade, and which are helpful in your trade. Not sure about the electrical tool since you imply its not a common acquisition for others in your position, but it doesn't strike me as something to be too concerned about. There's no formal way of documenting these tool purchases, but I'm sure you can think of something creative to document your business purpose and which doesn't look like it was manufactured for an examination. | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| Thoughts;
1. I have been through a number of audits. None are pleasant, but most result in no change to taxes 2. Do NOT worry about an audit if you have receipts for expenses AND they are legitimate work expenses!! 3. If you do not have receipts, but have other means or metrods to establish expenes, do NOT worry. 4. Only if you have LIED, cheated or hidden income, then WORRY! | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 4 January 2007 |
| Myself, DZ and one or two others can almost guarantee you that you will not be audited. However, Besides saving the receipts, probably the most important document you would need is a letter from your employer stating that you have to supply your own tools. I have run into auditors, make them Office auditors who never leave their desk, who will assume that your shop will supply the tools and if you respond that the tools the shop has are inadequate, they will not care and disallow the expenses as not being necessary. These people have no idea how the world works, or of the pride you might take in doing the job well, or that the Snap-On tools man makes his living selling tools to mechanics. You will win in the end with proper representation, but a letter from the employer goes a long way to getting there.
btw, isn't 12string a type of guitar? or bass? | |
| 4 January 2007 | |
| 12string- SORRY! some of us started kidding around, and trying to be funny, (guess that didn't help you very much). If you would have said at the beginning that your W-2 was for $22,000, instead of gross income of $22,000, we wouldn't have gone down the wrong path. Now that I think that I understand the question, I would respond that: I understand your concerns,and you have a right to be concerned...these are high costs. BUT if they are required, and you do use them 100% for business they are legal to deduct.(Even the steel toe boots in my opinion). I would use D&T's suggestion of getting a letter from your employer saying that you need to supply your own tools. A lot of people fear an IRS audit, IRS wants you to....they feel it makes you want to do things right. But if you follow the rules, the can look at your return, but they can't touch! | |
| 5 January 2007 | |
| I read publication 946 to learn about a section 179 election and I noticed a few differences between the section 179 election and an unreimbursed employee expense as far as my situation goes:
1) The 179 requires that the tool be placed into service the year that it is being deducted and the unreimbursed employee expense can be used once the tool is incurred or purchased. 2) There is a 2% of AGI "penalty" for the unreimbursed employee expense. There seems to be no such "penalty" for the 179 election. 3) The unreimbursed employee expense is an "all or none" deal where as the 179 election can be done on a percentage basis based on how much they are used for personal use. Did I miss anything? Taken from Death&Taxes' post: "btw, isn't 12string a type of guitar? or bass?" Some guitars have 12 strings and some have 6. There are more with 6 than 12 out there. I have never seen a bass with 12 srtings but that does not mean that one can't be found. I have 3 guitars and one of them, perhaps my favorite one, has 12 strings and that is where I got the idea for my screen name. "Besides saving the receipts, probably the most important document you would need is a letter from your employer stating that you have to supply your own tools." What do I do once I obtain this letter?? Send it in with my return?? Present it to an auditor?? | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 5 January 2007 |
| I'd just keep the letter with your work papers and receipts. Then on the off-chance it's needed, you have it. When you list your tools on your tax return, use generic names. An Acme model 123 means nothing. Many people know what an air compressor is. As far as describing what the tool does, ask your wife/girlfriend/sister/mom if they understand what a tool does. (A parts washer gets the dirt and grease off a part so it can be put back on the car.) If your wife/girlfriend/sister/mom doesn't know, write a 1-2 sentence explanation and attach it to your purchase receipt. | |
| 11 February 2007 | |
| 12 String, I am a ASE Master Tech. I claim my tools the year I purchase them. I claim any tool that is purchased for work, even if it's a roll of electrical tape. If it's used for work, then it's a legitimate deduction. A couple years ago I claimed $14,000 in tools alone. I also claim work uniforms and work boots. These are items that are required to perform my job, hence deductible. They are worn for work and not for leisure. I would not worry about being audited as long as you keep your receipts.
It is your job to file for every deduction you are entitled too.Unfortunately, the government has made the tax code so confusing that many just opt for standard deductions or paying someone to figure it out for them. Being afraid of being audited only benefits the government in this regard. Don't let that fear keep you from getting everything that you are owed. | |
| 11 February 2007 | |
| 12 String, not related to tools but another simple deduction people miss is taxes paid on personal property, especially the taxes on your vehicles registrations that's based on the value of the vehicle (usually called Ad Valorem Tax). | |
| 11 February 2007 | |
| http://www.tricountywoman.com/PocketbookSavvy.html note comment about tools | |
| 11 February 2007 | |
| Joka, the mileage question is addressed in other threads. Search "Mileage" in the search field. | |
| 11 February 2007 | |
| I posted the mileage question for 12string, he should search "mileage" and see if he qualifies. Also, 12string do you pay union dues? | |
| 11 February 2007 | |
| I'd do a sched. The uniforms and shoes are deductible as well as the maintence of them. The tools you purchase are also deductible. They go on the 2106.
You did state that you don't use your own vehicle for work. If you did that would also be deducted. Sec 179 is for self employed or businesses. So that does not apply to you. As for sched a, your W-2 may have state or local income tax on it that is deductible. If not, then you can deduct sales tax. Your income may be low enough to qualify for eic. | |
| February 11, 2007 | |
| Blrg - Sec 179 does apply to employees who buy equipment, tools, computers, etc. See the worksheet for Sch A, Miscellaneous Deductions, under Depreciation Smart Worksheet and Asset Entry Worksheet. | |
Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2007 |
| The mileage is only deductible if you are driving the auto for work, that is, going out on calls or traveling to temporary work sites. Carrying tools is not a reason for deducting the auto or truck. Publication 463 p. 15, except for the additional cost such as renting a trailer. | |
MRBARRYTAX (talk|edits) said: | 11 February 2007 |
| I BELIEVE THAT RIGHT APPROACH WOULD BE SECT 179, BECAUSE ON RARE CASE OF AUDIT, THE IRS CAN ARGUE THE TOOLS HAVE A LIFE USAGE OF OVER ONE YEAR.AND COULD NOT BE WRITTEN OFF IN ONE YEAR BUT BY SECT 179 USE WE CAN WRITE OFF ENTIRE COST IN ONE YEAR ON 2106 FORM | |
Fuzzy Faced Leader (talk|edits) said: | 12 February 2007 |
| 12string, you've entered into the tangeled web of tax preparation. For your first complex return, do not try to do it yourself. Go to a pro. Let him/her set up the depreciation schedules, answer your questions, put it all together for you. You will save taxes, which will probably be more than the prep. fee. Then try it yourself the second year. | |
| 12 February 2007 | |
| 12string - dude (or dudette), take the blasted deduction. If you get audited, pay back the $600+ and some interest and maybe a penalty. And be sure to get back to us if you do get audited! | |
| 12 February 2007 | |
| I can't believe this discussion has gone on this long without someone suggesting this person look at Pub 17.
My only question is why is this taxpayer paying for items (to maintain and repair shop equipment) that should be the owner's responsibility. taxea | |
| 12 February 2007 | |
| 12string regarding the tools.........I had a client with the exact situation. He was a first year auto mechanic. His deductions for tools were 50% of his income, but he was living with his parents and had no big personal expenses. He received a w-2 and we took the Sec 179 on the tools on Form 2106. IRS sent him a notice that he must send in a copy of the receipts for the tools that were deducted. He did not have all of the receipts and the deduction for those tools were then denied. My client honestly incurred the expenses and we gave it a shot, but sometimes we lose if we have not kept accurate records and receipts. | |
| February 12, 2007 | |
| Taxea - Many mechanics are required to buy their own tools and equipment, and they are responsible for maintaining their equipment. When they leave that employment, they take their tools and equipment with them. This person is not paying for maintenance or repair of equipment items owned by the owner. He is paying for his own tools and equipment (and maintenance). | |
| 12 February 2007 | |
| I know the part about "their own" but that wasn't clear to me on the maint. of equipment at the shop...didn't sound like it was his. taxea | |


