Discussion:Professional corp

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Advanced Tax Questions --> Professional corp
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Professional corp

PBinNJ (talk|edits) said:

10 June 2008
Are the terms professional corporation and personal services corporation interchangeable? Aside from the 35% tax rate on the professional corp, can you give me a heads up on the major differences between c corp, pc and psc. Thanks.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

June 10, 2008
Professional Corp is usually a state legal definition, there is no language in the Fed law like that. A professional corp as defined by the state can be either a C or S for Fed unless prohibited by the state. And if a C, is a PSC if it meets the definitions of that by the Feds. Hope that helps.

Blrgcpa (talk|edits) said:

10 June 2008
A pc can be an s corp and pay accordingly.

PBinNJ (talk|edits) said:

10 June 2008
This is probably a stupid question but why would physician for example want to file as a pc which must be taxed at 35%? Is it because the individual tax rates are so much higher than 35% and the pc was more attractive?

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

10 June 2008
Generally, by state law, certain professionals (e.g., docs, lawyers, architects, engineers, CPA's) are only allowed to incorporate as professional service corps which gives them less liability protection than a regular corp provides its stockholders. Joe Dokes, CPA is a proprietorship. John Doe, CPA, PS is a professional service corp. John decided he wanted to be a corporation for some reason. Maybe because he preferred S corp taxation to Sch C taxation. Or maybe he has co-owners and they jointly preferred corporate taxation to partnership taxation. As long as JDCPAPS elects S status it (the corporation)will not be subject to the 35% tax rate applicable to PSC's. In that case, the corporation is a "professional service corp" but not "personal service corp" as defined for tax purposes.

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

10 June 2008
Professional service corporation: http://www.bizfilings.com/products/profcorp.asp

Personal service corporation: http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/old/10428238.htm

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

June 10, 2008
Sadly, many physcians prefer the PSC status, ummmm, because of status. Dumb, but true.

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

11 June 2008
Not all Professional Corporations are subject to the 35% rate. For example, if the spouse of the professional is a shareholder, but not an employee, the 35% rate can avoided by issuing 6% of the stock to the spouse.

Also, it is a fairly simple matter to zero out the corporate profit in a PSC.

LemRI (talk|edits) said:

June 11, 2008
Seems like all PC's would also be required to be PSC's, seeing as the requirements are the same.

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

11 June 2008
No, the requirements are not the same. To be a PSC, the corp must be a C corp. A PC may be either a C or an S. There are other differences as well, but it is too late to think about it.

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

12 June 2008
Not all PSC's are PC's and not all PC's are PSC's. Professional corporations are creatures of state law. PSC's are creatures of tax law.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums