Discussion:Problems with Lacerte

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Problems with Lacerte

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

1 February 2007
I did not see a thread devoted to discussing general problems with Lacerte. So I created this thread so that we can all share problems that we identified and potential solutions from other Lacerte users.

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

1 February 2007
And I will go ahead and start...

We add client-specific notes to Screen 39, Worksheet that we would prefer our clients not see. In every other module, this sheet does not print in the Client Copy. But this sheet DOES print with the Client Copy in the S-Corp module. So now all of our S-Corp clients get to read our in-office notes that we have about them. Be very careful what you write!

I told Lacerte about this last year (2005). They did not fix it with Lacerte 2006.

CATAXES (talk|edits) said:

1 February 2007
Lacerte is hardly ever a problem. Usually I find I was the problem and Lacerte was the solution.

CATAXES (talk|edits) said:

1 February 2007
I just put some notes on screen 39 and printed a federal return to a pdf file. Opened the file, looks good, no sign of the notes anywhere.

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

1 February 2007
We print out the General Information worksheet in our Client Copy. We like to provide this information to our clients because it shows carryforward information and other information about their return. Unfortunately, adding this worksheet to the Client Copy will also add a statement titled "Federal Supplemental Information" that prints the Screen 39, Worksheet information.

This bug is only true in the S-Corp module, i.e. adding the General Information worksheet to the client copy of the C-Corp module will NOT add the "Federal Supplement Information" to the Client Copy.

Tdoyle (talk|edits) said:

February 1, 2007
PVV:

I contacted the people who work on the S Corp program and they said they hadn't heard about this until earlier today when they received a similar report (not sure what happened to your report from last year). They're looking into it, but at first glance it does appear to be a defect. Thanks for letting us know about this, PVV!

- Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator - Talk to me 15:42, 1 February 2007 (CST)

San Diego (talk|edits) said:

1 February 2007
Thanks, I have a 1120S I was about to print that says "ensure payment up front in cash due to going concern of business".

Jokadah (talk|edits) said:

1 February 2007
New problem with Lacerte. Form 8283 - Non Cash Contributions. Client has goodwill receipts with date of donation, moved out of state and donated tons of furniture, electronics, household, etc. All in good condition and over $500 FMV. She purchased the items donated at various times. When you enter various for date acquired program will not let you efile. What's up with that?

CATAXES (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
Question came up earlier in the week and one of the posters called the IRS. Not just a Lacerte problem. This is apparently an IRS requirement and Lacerte has changed 2006 software to comply.

AKaccountess (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
Its part of the new tax bill passed in December. IRS is going to hold the flame to non-cash contributions.

Lhhesscpa (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
With the installation of CD-4 and the 0130 update dates of "Various" can now be entered in Form 8283. BTW, there is a Lacerte category. -- Larry Hess, CPA, Albuquerque, NM - Talk to me

SBCPA (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
Lhhesscpa

Did you use the update within Lacerte? We did this yesturday and still have the date issue.

Anyone try to customize report headers with the tax planner that came out this week? We spent almost three hours on the phone with programmers yesturday and even they could not get it to work properly. Hope it gets corrected soon.

Lhhesscpa (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
I updated this afternoon and checked out what I said just before I posted it. Thanks for letting me know about the planner headers. Seems like there was a similar problem with the mid-year update. -- Larry Hess, CPA, Albuquerque, NM - Talk to me

SBCPA (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
Thanks. We must have been a bit too early on the update. Will try again now.

Lhhesscpa (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
What bugs me about the Planner reports is that the customizations I made in the 2005 Planner aren't carried over to 2006. So I have to do them all again. I use this program quite heavily to determine the estimated tax payment requirements. I spend a lot of time with it but the way Lacerte gives it such a low development priority means that I am not nearly as productive with it as I could be. -- Larry Hess, CPA, Albuquerque, NM - Talk to me

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

2 February 2007
I don't know if this is the same thing or something different. But in the 2005 Tax Planner you were able to identify a Default Report for all new plans. They took this option away in the 2006 Tax Planner.

Larry, Did you say there is a Lacerte Forum? Where?

Tdoyle (talk|edits) said:

February 2, 2007
PVV:

Go to the Discussion Forum Index (linked at the top of this page). In the bottom section, under Other Resources is a link to the Accountant Community. That's where the Lacerte Forums are.


- Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator - Talk to me 22:53, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Tdoyle (talk|edits) said:

February 2, 2007
PVV: Also, Larry has started to categorize the discussions here that are Lacerte related. To see all of them, just click the Lacerte link in the categories at the bottom.


- Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator - Talk to me 11:19, 2 February 2007 (CST)

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

6 February 2007
Somebody in my office discovered a minor bug in the Corporation module. I am sure Lacerte will fix it soon, but you should keep an eye out for this if you are processing Corporations.


Under CA law, you cannot use MACRS Depreciation. Most practitioners (that follow this non-conformity rule) use Double Declining Balance with a conversion to Straight Line. If the depreciation has converted to straight line, under certain circumstances, Lacerte is not calculating any current depreciation.

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

10 February 2007
I'm sure most of you Lacerte users know about the Filter Group features that can be used to filter the client list, e.g. show all clients with AGI of at least $100,000.

Did you also know that those filters will work on password-protected files?

So, even though you cannot see the AGI of a password protected file, you can still design a Filter to determine what the AGI of that password-protected client is.

CATAXES (talk|edits) said:

10 February 2007
PVVCPA - Would you repeat that? CA cannot use MACRS???

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

10 February 2007
CA C-Corps do not conform to MACRS depreciation. See my first sentence...My post was speaking within the context of the Corporation module.

Ztom (talk|edits) said:

11 February 2007
The new download of lacerte accepts various dates on non cash contr

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

February 19, 2007
I am doing my first exchange in Lacerte this year, and I saw that they have a new diagnostic that states the entries have been made in both the "Cash given by taxpayer" and "Cash received by taxpayer" fields. And that Lacerte recommends netting these two numbers.

Be aware that netting of boot is NOT allowed in a deferred exchange. Following Lacerte's recommendation to net the boot may lead to an understatement of income and an underpayment of taxes.

See discussions about boot netting at: http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:1031_EXCHANGE-mortgage

Tdoyle (talk|edits) said:

February 19, 2007
I was just asked to post this reply to PVVCPA's post above:
"The diagnostic was added because a lot of users are looking for the kind of results they get when netting the amounts. However, after reviewing this post, the tax developer concurs and will be removing it in a later release."

- Tim Doyle, TaxAlmanac Moderator - Talk to me 10:45, 19 February 2007 (CST)

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

March 25, 2007
Re: Proforma of Minimum Tax Credit information.

Lacerte does not proforma over the prior year's AMT Foreign Tax Credit Form 6251, Line 32 to the current year Form 8801, Line 12.

Therefore, the current year tax return may not be generating a Form 8801 Minimum Tax Credit if your client is due this credit. Or it may be generating the Form, but calculating a lower credit amount.

This is technically not a bug, as the current year Form 8801, Line 12 may not necessarily be the same number as the prior year Form 6251, Line 32. You are supposed to do a calculation of the Foreign Tax Credit claimed only on exclusion items. However, my experience has been that these are the same number.

Lacerte should have at least provided a Proforma Diagnostic and a current year Diagnostic alerting the user that this field was left blank.

GPV (talk|edits) said:

25 March 2007
Has anyone had a problem when entering W-2 into lacerte.

After Tax ID # of company is entered end then you go down to enter the ER's name in and hit enter the fed ID # of the Er disappears and have to re-enter

PVVCPA (talk|edits) said:

March 25, 2007
Yep! Lacerte made some "upgrades" this year to their Auto Fill features. That's one of the two bugs that came along with it.

Larry0434 (talk|edits) said:

25 March 2007
Only difficulty I am having are all those update messages. I am running the current version but continue to get update warnings. I ignore them.

Lacerte has made significant improvements over last year. By the way, I do not believe any tax preparation software complete like kind exchanges correctly. I do some every year and I have to calculate them using my private spreadsheet. Otherwise, I may get the wrong answer. I think this is just a complicated issue.

Will (talk|edits) said:

25 March 2007
Thanks for posting that GPV, I thought I was losing my mind. Didn't know what was causing it but I new I was entering the EIN!

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums