Discussion:ProSeries and State Refunds

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> ProSeries and State Refunds

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

13 March 2007
Question Transferred

My question is related to the way ProSeries handles the State tax refund from the previous year. Example: The client gets a 1099G for $500 (refund received from the state). However, after the transfer by ProSeries of the previous year's state return information, the state refund appears on the 1040 line10 in the amount of $139. How could this be ? The client had itemized deductions on Schedule A of $24,000. I looked at the ProSeries 1099G worksheet, and the amount of the refund Line2 is different from what appeared on the previous year state tax refund. Also, the ProSeries "Federal Carry Forward" worksheet amount is different from the previous year's state tax refund. I have contacted the ProSeries technical support help-desk and they were of very little help. It's been very frustrating interacting with Intuit. I welcome any insight you maybe able to provide.

Restated in short form: Can I assumed that ProSeries is handling the previous years state tax refund correctly ? I have followed previous threads regarding the subject and everything seems to point to ProSeries doing things correctly, although, the IRS Federal Instruction Line10 worksheet computes something different. Any light on the subject would be appreciated.

Chet Truthseeker 14:46, 13 March 2007 (CST)

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

13 March 2007
Personally I never assume the software is getting anything right. A lot of things can happen to data files. Correct the entries on the carryforward worksheets and see if you can follow what the program is doing.

Sw (talk|edits) said:

March 13, 2007
Did you use ProSeries in 2005 or convert a different tax program to 2005 and then transfer to 2006? I know I changed program a few years ago and the information does not always transfer properly, but I'm like Dennis you can't assume.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

March 13, 2007
I answered this earlier in a PM and suggested that there are two times that I see this happen: when itemized deducts are limited, and when AMT kicks in. . .other than that, I usually blindly believe the software if my refund is as reported on the worksheet.

TJ (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
Dennis, like you I have had a few problems this year re: previous years state refund. I never had this problem before - using ProSeries for many years. Now, I double-check. A few times the amount was way off.

Klesher (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
Agree with Jr - I have seen it happen quite freguently when they are making est payments - the program takes less in the Sch A also

Truthseeker (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
I re-worked the 1099G state refund using the IRS 1040 Instructions for Line10(State refund worksheet) and the taxable amount is different from ProSeries. And to answer Sw question, I used

ProSeries last year (2005 and 2004). For those who are seeing a reduced state taxable amount from the 1099G (previous year), how are you handling the difference ? ps: client did not make estimated payments or AMT. I think the software is not properly handling the previous year state transfer. Any comments are welcome. I can't seem to get a straight answer from Intuit technical support. I'm very tempted to file asis, but I don't want to hear of clients receiving letters later.

Dennis (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
Examine the worksheet and find out what the software is doing. It will tell you.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
I almost always check the 1099G to the software 1099G worksheet. I do not recall seeing a problem yet in the professional edition. What it does do is if there was AMT the prior year, it sends you to the State Refund worksheet where you then open 2005 and do as Dennis has decribed elsewhere.

Come to think of it I did have one that at first did not make sense until I followed the state refund worksheet....seems to me it was because part of the refund was ascribed to the estimated taxes paid in January 2006.

Klesher (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
Yes exactly, DT - I just had one that did not have AMT , the 1099G was input correctly, and Proseries Pro allocated some towards the estimate paid. I leave mine - if you add the taxes taken on A and the amount of refund claimed on 1040 it adds up.

Truthseeker (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
Klesher - you stated the "the 1099G was input correctly". Did you input the 1099G on the worksheet, or

did Proseries Pro bring over this amount from the previous year? There are times, I am seeing where the 1099G worksheet state tax refund amount line is "locked" by Proseries and the amount is NOT the same as the TP prior year's state refund. However, I can link to the state refund worksheet and over-type that amount. (I rather have the software not put anything from the carry over year, especially if it's not the same amount from the TP previous state tax refund.)

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
I've not seen that, Seeker. What I saw last night was a case where was we thought was a $129 refund credited to 2006 when filed last year turned out to be a $171 payment. Client had not paid one $300 installment for 2005 thus the change. When they received the notice in the summer, I went to the 2005 and changed the estimated payments in the Federal tax payment worksheet, but I did not open the state. This year's import showed on the Federal screens the correct amounts after the correction, but when I opened the state, there was the $129 payment from the overpayment. Very interesting.

Klesher (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
Truth seeker - yes the 1099G is correct. I always check the amount- if it is not right, you can change it at the carryover worksheet. then that carries over to the 1099 G worksheet

CEwoodson (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
The ProSeries worksheet works correctly but you have to know what it is doing ... and that ain't easy. The first thing to understand is that, if you know what the taxable refund really is, turn off the worksheet and enter the "correct" amount on the Carryover Worksheet itself (where the program transfers the refund from 2005).

If you have AMT in 2005 (which would normally make the refund not taxable) you need to enter the AMT correctly in the Tax Refund Worksheet (in the bottom section if memory serves). Even then, the worksheet doesn't handle the 4th quarter estimated tax payment paid in 2006 properly. The IRS instructions of how to make that allocation are, in my opinion, without justification or support in code or regulations. They have made the instructions be the "new" regulation.

Best bet ... know what the correct taxable refund is and don't use the Tax Refund Worksheet.

Sharkatax (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
One more thing I haven't seen mentioned here -- If in the previous year the TP used the sales tax method instead of the income tax method for itemized deductions, the TP could still have 24,000 of itemized deductions in 2005 and still not have all of the State refund be taxable in 2006. This would be the third time this could happen in addition to limited deduductions and AMT. If had this situation and PS calculated correctly.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
Another good point: and is not the taxable refund also measured as the lesser of the refund or the lesser of the difference between the refund and the potential sales tax deduction, even if not used?

Truthseeker (talk|edits) said:

14 March 2007
To All:

Thank you for your input concerning this matter. I just received a call from Intuit Proseries level 2 support and found out there was an ALERT issued for Illinois related to the state tax refund carryover sheet. It seems that to correct the bug, you were suppose to apply a fix issued January 19; wipe out all previous brought over files during your initial prior year transfers and this should have the 1099G and 1040 line10 correctly matching your prior year state refund. Also, if you have already started working on a client, you could go to the State Refund Worksheet and over-typed the amount in column "F". Now I can move forward since knowing that there was truly a bug in the software and a work around exist. As for the various talking points, there is a lot involved in determining how much of a state refund is taxable. Thanks again to everyone for their input.

--Truthseeker 14:32, 14 March 2007 (CST)

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

March 14, 2007
Ah, I don't transfer until I'm ready to do it, never had a good reason why, until now.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums