Discussion:LLC return filed using 1120S...no way, right?
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> LLC return filed using 1120S...no way, right?
| 19 April 2006 | |
| I have just picked up a small Llc as a client. The prior CPA filed the Llc return on the form 1120S. You can't do that right? By the prior CPA encouraging the client to file as-if they were an S-Corp would allow the company the "flexibility" of the Llc but, the Payroll Tax advantages of the S-Corp. Additionally, cost/charges would be un-necessarily incurred by
1) Prior CPA's charges for 940, 941, and UCT-6 (FL payroll tax) filing.............because, for an Llc they are not needed. 2) The client was told to pay the FL State payroll tax (which is he is exempt from because he is a single-owner LLC One other point.... the client has a solo 401(k). The prior CPA made the company profit sharing limited to 25% of wages....this would be true for an S-Corp but...........sincethe company is a single-owner LLC, wouldn't the company sharing portion be limited to 20% of net earnings to the owner? | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Should I amend the client's return? If I don't amend...am I allowed to file next year's business operations on Sch C (in standard single-owner Llc fashion)? | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Hang on. He did the check the box to tax that LLC as an S. You're an S now. Read some of the old threads on the topic. Like you, I don't care for this method of becoming an S, but he's an S. So think of him that way. It's ok. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| So...the prior CPA had the client pay payroll taxes on the wages ($65k) AND the net income of the company ($41k). This means that the client over paid payroll taxes by $6,273...right? (41,000 x 15.3% = 6,273) | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| I understand that a C-Corp can elect to be an S-Corp but....are you sure an LLC can? | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| There are a lot more questions to ask your client. Is this LLC an S-Corp, a partnership, or a sole proprietorship? Did they file the 8832 election? Was it a C-Corp to begin with? Did the C-Corp file a 2553 to elect to be treated as an S-Corp? | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Definitely no payroll tax on the profits, so that is an error. Oh, my, and he assessed the full SS tax on the extra 41K? No wonder you doubt! That's wrong and goofy! Amend to retrieve that 6273 that was paid in error, and treat him like any other S with his 65k salary. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Gmikeg.....
This guy filed his company as a single-owner LLC. Thus, he is taxed as a sole proprietor. ( Or so I thought). I received his tax returns and saw that the prior CPA filed his business return as an S-Corp (on 1120S). Apparently (per JR1) this is ok, as long as they "elect". What is needed to "elect" to file a registered LLC as an S-Corp. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Technically, that form 8832, but I'll lay big odds that that's one IRS doesn't care about, and will accept the first filing as an election. Others will ring in on their thoughts. I've never used the check the box deal, so I understand it, but never had to live there. In your case, you've got a bigger mess on your hands if you want to try going back and saying that he wasn't an S. PR tax returns have been filed, the 401k has been funded, etc. That's an easy, leave it alone, call... | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Hi,
Not to be a master of the obvious, but a sole proprietorship, without electing otherwise, is considered 'disregarded as a separate entity'. Which means, as you may know, that the company is truly a 'pass-through entity', and not regarded as a tax-paying 'individual'. Such as partnerships, to some extent, and as a sole proprietorships. To make this short, please let me know if this is a 'one' owner business, or something else.
Mike | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| But he has elected by filing the 1120S. He's no longer disregarded. Sfrey, call meant, it's an easy call. He's an S. If you feel it necessary to file the 8832, then do it, but I'll lay odds that IRS considers him an S now. No way, Gmike, do you want to even try to undo this. You're going to unfile payroll filings? And unfile the W2? And revoke, with penalties, the 401k? I think that would be disastrous and takes months if not years to straighten out. He's an S. Get over it. Could be worse..he could be a C! Or have real estate in the corp.! | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| This is a one owner business. I believe he should have never filed the taxes as an S-Corp. But..the CPA did.
Can I "elect" to have the one-owner llc STOP being taxed as an S-Corp (even after this one was filed) and file him next year as an LLC? | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| JR1,
By no means am I attempting to undo this. Just wanted to make sure the elections have taken place. And if not.....I was not here............. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| With everyone being professionals and dealing with this matter, I assume everyone has read and understood the instructions to forms 8832 and 2553. First, it must be determined that the entity has properly elected S corporation status. Then we go from there. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Well, did jump to a couple conclusions, Willy...good point. If that's not the case, you've got a whole 'nuther sityation here...
And no, Sfrey, if he's an S, you can't just go back. You'd have to liquidate him like any other S. So, probably the place to start is Willy's suggestion, make sure this guy is even valid as an S and then report back. And...that does remind me that someone noted a few weeks back that if the 2553 was properly filed, that by itself serves as the 8832 as well. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Bur seriously, I simply can't catch up to someone else's return......I tried my best...
Mike | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| OK Bite me, LOl ,,,
Willy, (I love you), But, I just said what Willy said.... check your client's elections... | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| That should have read: OK, JR1, bite me, but...........and here I go with the AOL crap.... | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Sfrey, forgive me for butting in late. I think you have some homework to do. First, you need to understand how LLC's work. When you set up an LLC, by default a SMLLC is taxed as its owner is, i.e., if owned by an individual, it gets taxed either on Sch C or Sch E, if owned by a corp, it gets folded into the parent corp as a division. A multi-member LLC owned by two or more entities (individuals or corps) gets treated like a partnership. THAT IS THE DEFAULT. But if you don't like that method, as JR & others have pointed out, it can be changed. It gets changed by ELECTING to be taxed like a corporation on Form 8832, "Entity Classification Election." Once an election is made to have the entity taxed like a corporation, a second election is necessary to elect to have it taxed like an S corp, using Form 2553. (I think the IRS has recently combined the elections so that both the entity election and the S election are made on a single form, but I am not sure about that, so you need to look it up if it applies.)
Having learned about LLC taxation, your next bit of homework is to determine whether or not these elections were properly made by your client. Calling the IRS may be one way of finding out. Asking the client for copies of the forms he filed to make the elections would be another way. If the elections have been made, then the owner will need to be paid wages, just like a corporate officer. Corporate distributions will be treated like S distributions or dividends, if no S election has been made. Once the election is made, you can't just go back and start using a Schedule C. You can make a new election, but a new election will be treated like a corporate liquidation with all the attendant tax effects that you had better know about before going down the road, because it could be costly. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Yeah, that's what we said, only with less words.. :) . Good explanation. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| That was an extremely great explanation..... I have a feeling this CPA didn't file the form 8832 or 2553. I have the client calling this prior CPA to find out.
If the prior CPA DID, in fact, file the election correctly....then, the client paid WAY TOO much in PR taxes (paid PR tax on the net income of the company). If the prior CPA DID NOT file the election correctly....then the client should be taxed as a sole-proprietor...thus, the PR taxes paid on the wages AND the net income of the company would be correct.....It would mean the prior CPA just filed on the wrong form...right? So, the company would retain its "disregarded" status and it would continue life as an Llc with no PR taxes, just SE tax on the total earnings to the owner...right? | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Yes, if no elections were file, it should have been taxed like a proprietorship. You will need to amend a slew of returns (941/940, 1120S, 1040) | |
Mtmckeecpa (talk|edits) said: | 19 April 2006 |
| S,
If your new client has a tough time getting the answer or no answer from the prior CPA, I would get a POA (power of attorney) from your client, covering 2004 or 2005, using whatever EIN and name was file d on the 1120s and call the Practioner's Priority Hotline and determine what the client has on file with the IRS. | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Thank you everyone. You all have been extremely helpful. I will post the resolution.... | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| Sfrey;
Also check with sunbiz.org and see if the corporate resolution is onfile with the State of Florida. Some of the articles of incorporation will give you a hint as well how this entity is to be taxed. Boy would I hate to amend 940/941/uct-6's for 4 quarters and w/2's. And to amend 941's, you have to file a 941C with a current 941, correct? So, if the entity does not report 941's, then it will be alot of work to have IRS disregard the former 941's. UUGGHH; I hate payroll taxes as they are, let alone amending them. Good luck... | |
| 19 April 2006 | |
| This discussion has been very good and Sfre006, you may be facing a mountain of trouble if you have to amend tax returns and payroll forms.
How many years has the prior accountant filed the 1120S? If more than 2 years, then I would assume that the entity is regarded as an S Corp in the event that the LLC client did not receive any notices from the IRS indicating that the wrong tax form was filed. I have recently been reading the IRS regs regarding LLC's and making the ELECTION to be treated as a corporation/S corporation. If this election was made, then the IRS regs say that in order to Elect for different tax treatment (as sole proprietorship), the taxpayer would have to wait 5 years. | |
| 20 April 2006 | |
| Prior accountant has probably been correctly treating the entity as S Corp. If one had to assume, one should assume the CPA was professional in how he or she handled the entity. It is better to get the data, and know for certain, rather than speculate on what might be. | |
| 20 April 2006 | |
| I would agree..... assume the prior account CORRECTLY elected to file as an S-Corp .....so, then we would all assume that the PR Taxes would be applied to ONLY the reasonable salary... well....this guy applied the 15.3% to the salary AND net income of the company.
Clearly incorrect, right? | |
| 20 April 2006 | |
| Right. Better find out for sure what has been file, what has been elected, since obvious errors have been made, it is (even more than usually) dangerious to assume anything. | |
| 20 April 2006 | |
| WillyB,
Is it true that one cannot simply file an 1120S, and be considered an S-Corp? It is my understanding that the election must be made during the first 3 1/2 months of the tax year on form 8832. The 2553 is just for C-Corps electing to be S-Corps, and the 8832 is for disregarded entities, and other company forms electing to be taxed as a Corp, right? | |
| 20 April 2006 | |
| GMikeg, an LLC "becomes" a corp by electing to be treated as one on the 8832. All corporations are "born" into C status and it requires an S election, made on Form 2553 to change what nature (or Congress) has wrought. So yes, it is true, that one cannot simply file an 1120S to be considered and S corp. If you do, you can expect to receive a notice from the IRS saying they have nothing on file showing that an S election has been made. And if the LLC has not made the election on 8832, you'll probably receive another notice about that as well. | |
| 21 April 2006 | |
| I noted recently that the instructions to form 8832, which we have all read, of course, say that by an "eligible entity" filing the form 2553, the election to be treated as an S-Corp is deemed to have been made. This was news to me, but there has been a lot of change in the "check the box" area over the past few years. That is to say, form 8832 is not also required.
If an S election is not made by the 75th day of the proposed S corp year (usually a calendar year, but not necessarily), then the election is effective for the following year. This used to be an iron-clad rule. More recently, late elections have been allowed for various reasons and under various rev. rulings. I just file by the 75th day for my clients to keep it simple. | |
| 21 April 2006 | |
| The IRS has become quite lax in allowing late elections. Supposedly you need an excuse, but it is pretty easy to find one. (Atty thought CPA did election, CPA thought atty did it. TP was clueless, Dog ate it, etc.) I think you can file a late election as late as the due date of the return, and in some cases, even after that (e.g., you thought it had been made, you filed the 1120S, all shareholders included the K-1 income in their returns and all agree that it was their intent to do so.) | |
| 21 April 2006 | |
| That was kinda my point way back. While that wall was impenetrable long ago, now, they'll let just about any excuse do and allow the S. Who knows but that they may just accept the first 1120S filing now? You may have to offer some lame excuse, like, the old acct. didn't even know to not apply PR taxes to profits, so duh, he's probably didn't know how to find the 2553....but I suspect that you can keep the S election valid one way or another and move forward. | |
| 21 April 2006 | |
| I preferred the simplicity of the old, iron clad rule. Made it simple. Now if election was messed up, Maybe it can be fixed. And how long will that take? Don't know. When will be straighted out? Can't tell. Who will donate the time or pay for the professional time to sort it out? Another messy issue.
I should appreciate the service trying to be more user friendly I guess. But I am too old-school. Was it really "long ago?" I did not realize that. | |
| 21 April 2006 | |
| I agree, Willy. In our world today, as fast as things change, yeah, 3-4 qualifies as long ago! I was thinking back a bit further actually...when we made about 5 copies of the S election acceptance to send to all our friends in case the IRS lost theirs! | |
| 21 April 2006 | |
| I have an LLC that the members complained about the amount they were paying in se taxes on their income yet they refused to be cooperative when it came to ES payments. I suggested they elect to be treated as an S Corp and pay themselves through payroll. No more b****in' | |


