Discussion:Husband/wife members of LLC

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Husband/wife members of LLC

Clarklarry (talk|edits) said:

15 December 2005
I have a client whose LLC has 2 members: the husband and the wife. They file joint returns (federal and NC). My question: is this a single member LLC even though there are 2 members?

Thanks, Larry

RLMCPA (talk|edits) said:

16 December 2005
It depends on the state you are in and what kind of business the LLC is. If the LLC is a rental, you can elect to treat it as a single member LLC. See Rev. Proc. 2002-22, 2002-1 CB 733.

For any other type of business, the technical rule is that when a husband and wife own a business together, it is considered a partnership under tax law, unless another type of entity is elected, such as C or S Corporation. However, the IRS has recently ruled that if you are in a community property state, you can treat the husband and wife as one taxpayer for purposes of the single member LLC rules. See Rev. Proc. 2002-69, 2002-2 CB 831.

Therefore, if you are in a separate property state, the husband and wife are considered to own interests separately, i.e. now you have 2 members of the LLC. Technically, unless the exception above applies, the husband and wife are considered "partners" in business and a partnership tax return is required unless you elect to be a C or S Corporation. This may not be a bad thing. Yes, it does require an additional tax return, but it also allows each spouse to have potential SE income/wages towards future social security benefits. Some computer programs will not split the Schedule C income between each spouse and calculate SE tax on each spouses share.

With that said, practically, I have never seen the IRS pursue this technicality and I find my husband and wife business/rentals clients do not want to file the additional tax return. Also, except for maybe "basis" issues, I think the net effect on their joint tax returns is the same. I usually explain this to the clients, let them decide, then make notes to the file regarding same. Probably not the simple answer you were hoping for...

Casper (talk|edits) said:

7 January 2006
Interesting topic. Ann attorney recently advised me that a husband and wife should elect multiple member status; even though we are a community property state. He claimed it would give the LLC better asset protection in case of lawsuit. Can anyone comment on this?

RLMCPA (talk|edits) said:

7 January 2006
That may be true. If the LLC interests are legally separate under state law and tax returns exists that show husband & wife treated the interests separately, then if one of them commits a tort it may protect the other's interest. Also, a good LLC operating agreement would only give a potential creditor "assignee" rights, which, as I understand it, means the creditor has very little rights and is only entitled to distributions, if any are made, but can't force distributions. Creditors hate these kind of assets and will try to pursue other assets, i.e. other than the LLC.

Also, most community property states have a provision which allows husband and wife to own separate property if they specifically designate as such.

Disclaimer - I am not an attorney, only a CPA citing what my experience has been. Also, I'm in Alaska, which is a separate property state. But, we do have a special "opt in" option for community property, where residents here can designate certain property as community property in the form of a written agreement or trust. We frequently consider the LLC issue when assisting clients with their "opt in" decisions plus I frequently deal with estates that have property in other states. We struggle with the community property issue since in many cases we want community property treatment due to the favorable tax basis step-up.

Bottomline: The attorney may be right. Maybe check with another attorney in the area to see if he/she agrees.

Riley2 (talk|edits) said:

15 January 2006
Since the taxpayers are in NC, I see no way for a business entity to file as a disregarded entity -- even if the LLC is investing in rental property. Rental property may be reported on Form 1040, instead of Form 1065, if the property is held as undivided interests. In this case, the property is not held as undivided interests; consequently, a Form 1065 is required.

My answer would change if the property was purchased with community property funds.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

8 June 2007
(note that this answer changes after 12/31/07)

Lhhesscpa (talk|edits) said:

9 June 2007
Sec. 8215 of the "Small Business and Work Opportunity Act of 2007" that was signed 4/25/07 in effect seems to allow disregarded entity treatment of what it refers to as a qualified joint venture which "means any joint venture involving the conduct of a trade or business if (A) the only members of such joint venture are a husband and wife,(B) both spouses materially participate (within the meaning of section 469(h) without regard to paragraph (5) thereof) in such trade or business, and (C) both spouses elect the application of this subsection.” Assuming an LLC is a qualified joint venture, this new law is effective for taxable years beginning after 12/31/2006. So, this could be the answer to the question raised here. -- Larry Hess, CPA | Albuquerque, NM | Talk to me

KDelt (talk|edits) said:

28 November 2007
My husband and I are purchasing a rental unit (4 apartments) and are considering forming an LLC to protect our personal property. Our lawyer has told us it would be a good thing to do. My question in regards to what happens when it is tax time. If we form a LLC, then how do we handle our tax return. Does the LLc flow through a schedule E or C, or do we need to file differently. We live in North Dakota.I know enough about taxes to be dangerous (ie: not enough)...I did seasonal tax prep for a CPA firm before we moved for 5 years but it all individual returns. I don't recall seeing any LLC's. Would my husband and I be able to be considered an individual LLC even though there are 2 of us since we are married? Any advice would be appreciated.

Thank you!

Johnhuddleston (talk|edits) said:

28 November 2007
For federal tax purposes, the LLC is ignored. The activity goes on schedule E.

John Huddleston Seattle Bellevue Tax Accountant

KDelt (talk|edits) said:

28 November 2007
Thank you:)

Ddaallas (talk|edits) said:

2 December 2007
Certain states (like Delaware) allow husband and wife to hold certain property as tenants by the entirety. You could set up the LLC so that 100% of the interests are held by a single "taxpayer" (the TBE), and you have pretty solid (and cheap) asset protection under state law, even though you are a single-member LLC. See in re Albright (291 B.R. 538 , 2003) for more on single-member LLC's. Note however that the IRS has successfully busted TBE's in several cases.

Tony2000 (talk|edits) said:

6 December 2007
This is a great discussion, and brings to mind a SMLLC issue which plagues me on a regualy basis. Often attorneys form a husband and wife LLC even though it is obvious one spouse runs the business. So we, as accountants in community property states, treat this as a SMLLC. All fine and dandy. What about the self rental rules? For example suppose a H & W purchase a business, 25000 equip, 75000 real estate. After the fact, they see an attorney who forms a LLC. The real estate on the sale is titled in the H & W name. The W runs the business as a

SMLLC and makes the mortgage payment out of the business checkbook. Since the bus is a SMLLC, sole P, and the Real estate is owned jointly outside of the LLC, does 1/2 of the mortage payment get reported a s Sch E income to the H, and 1/2 of the int and related depr get deducted on the Sch E? I always get confused, this is a community property state, so the H owns 1/2 of the real estate outside of the business. Since the H owns 1/2 of the real estate the wife on Sch C can not deduct his 1/2 against her SE income. I think to get out of this dilemma the H & W have to form a second LLC to hold the real estate, and choose to file a Form 1065 partnership return for the rental aspect.

Can a H & W in a community property state go into debt jointly to acquire a business and real estate, and have only one of the spouses report all of the assets, income, and expenses under their one schedule C business?

IN regards to a H & W scenerio, what if the business chooses SMLLC on Schedule C, and this first business rents real estate from the second LLC which owns the real estate? Would it be OK if the second LLC files a Partnership return? What if the second LLC also chooses to be treated as a SMLLC and report on Sch E?

I think in a community property state H & W scenerio you can choose to put everything, equipment and real estate, on one Sch C. If you want to use rent to reduce your self employment income you must form a second LLC and file a partnerhsip tax return.

I am not necessarily looking for an answer in so much as just a discussion,

Thank you, Tony

Melinda (talk|edits) said:

23 January 2008
I am a practicing CPA in NYS. I have many husband/wife LLC's. I am confused because according to the IRS, since they are organized as LLC's and NYS is not a community property state, they would have to continue to file a partnership return. But the instructions to NYS LLC Franchise Tax Form IT-204-LL say: Beginning after 2006, the $100 filing fee payable by a single-member LLC (SMLLC) that is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes has expired. Therefore, SMLLCs that are disregarded entities no longer have to file Form IT-204-LL. In addition, the partnership filing fee for an LLC with more than one member that is a disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes(for example, an LLC owned solely by a husband and wife) has expired." So NYS is sounds like they are allowing the husband/wife LLC's to file as a disregarded entity even though it is not a community property state. Am I missing something?

Chowychow (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2008
My question is similar to Melinda's. I haven't been able to get a straight answer or to find people who agree on one yet...

HR 2206 Sec. 8215 [Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-28)] is confusing. What qualifies as a joint venture? Would a husband-wife LLC (non-rental, Ohio - not a community property state) file Schedule C or 1065?

Chowychow (talk|edits) said:

25 January 2008
This is where the discrepancy is for me:

1. This IRS page states, "A business owned and operated by the spouses through a limited liability company does not qualify for the election."

2. Yet the amendment to IRC 761 made by HR 2206 states that any husband-wife joint venture normally treated as a partnership (like the husband-wife only LLC) can elect to file as 2 sole proprietors.

Any advice?

Melinda (talk|edits) said:

26 January 2008
I think they need to provide more guidance on this new tax law because there is a lot of confusion. After calling the IRS & NYS several times (which I really hate to do because of getting bad advice) NYS is calling an S Corp and Partnership a diregarded entity because the income and deductions flow thru to the owners' personal tax returns. In NYS, a husband and wife no longer have to pay the annual LLC fee, but they do have to complete a partnership return. I think to be safe, until more information is released, the safest best is to use a partnership return at the federal level. In community property states they can file two schedule C's.

Justlearning (talk|edits) said:

3 March 2008
Other than the IRS website, I find no support for the conclusion that a HW LLC does not qualify for QJV treatment. The provision was added to 1) reduce couples' Sub K compliance burdens and 2) correctly apportion medicare credit. By denying the HW LLC, both goals are potentially frustrated. Because Revenue Ruling 81-11, waives penalties for HW business who "have not historically filed a partnership return," it follows that couples incorrectly reporting SE income will continue do so. Therefore, the medicare crediting issue goes entirely ignored. Further, the National Tax Advocate noted the 761(f) modification would have no noticeable effect on national revenue. This being true, what difference does it make?? Same tax revenue but with less administrative and compliance costs. Am I missing something or is the Service trying to fend off a ghost?

Also, I take issue with Rev. Proc. 2002-69's continuance. If the two afford functionally identical treatment, but the RP does so without the participation requirement, community property states are given a generous tax advantage. Does anyone else see and agree?

Justlearning (talk|edits) said:

3 March 2008
Other than the IRS website, I find no support for the conclusion that a HW LLC does not qualify for QJV treatment. The provision was added to 1) reduce couples' Sub K compliance burdens and 2) correctly apportion medicare credit. By denying the HW LLC, both goals are potentially frustrated. Because Revenue Ruling 81-11, waives penalties for HW business who "have not historically filed a partnership return," it follows that couples incorrectly reporting SE income will continue do so. Therefore, the medicare crediting issue goes entirely ignored. Further, the National Tax Advocate noted the 761(f) modification would have no noticeable effect on national revenue. This being true, what difference does it make?? Same tax revenue but with less administrative and compliance costs. Am I missing something or is the Service trying to fend off a ghost?

Also, I take issue with Rev. Proc. 2002-69's continuance. If the two afford functionally identical treatment, but the RP does so without the participation requirement, community property states are given a generous tax advantage. Does anyone else see and agree?

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

3 March 2008
Melinda,

I'm NYS as well and this is a messed up issue. I've done what others have mentioned and informed clients that they are technically supposed to file a partnership return or to file two sch C's. Although, in proseries, it allows you to click on the sch c that it is operated jointly by husband and wife, but the Sch F provides a warning when this is clicked. Proseries recommends splitting the Sch F into two separate Sch F's.

Just my 2cents

Jillmn (talk|edits) said:

20 March 2008
Hello,

My husband and I have an LLC in CA; it was set up to hold real estate investments. For the purposes of the EIN, should I apply as a single-member or multi-member LLC?

Thanks

Dude7707 (talk|edits) said:

29 March 2008
As Melinda states above: I think to be safe, until more information is released, the safest best is to use a partnership return at the federal level. In community property states they can file two schedule C's.

Client is in community state currently filing 1065 for last few years. My associate who will be taking over for this client is recommending to discontinue filing 1065 for 2007 and file 2 Sch C's to reduce accounting fees as main reason. How is this filing change made for IRS?

Option A: Mark final on 2007 1065 and attach stmt will begin filing 2 Sch C's due to community state in subsequent years?

      B:  File 2 Sch C's and attach stmt referencing 1065 Id will no longer be filed as result of community state?

FYI: 1065 is 50/50 ownership/earnings

Also Wouldn't it be better to just file 1 Sch C to avoid the extra work? OR As RLCPA states "to have allows each spouse to have potential SE income/wages towards future social security benefits."

Joanmcq (talk|edits) said:

30 March 2008
In a community property state you have been able to file a joint Sch C; one Sch C with two Sch SEs. That is why the check box is available in all software for joint Sch Cs. With the new regs, its unclear whether this choice is still available for community property states or if you have to do two sch Cs.

Ick.

Szptax (talk|edits) said:

31 March 2008
what would you do in PA?

I have a couple with 2 rental properties & 1 they purchased to renovate & re-sell. My inclination is that with their planned level of activity, it should be filed as a partnership? The more I read on this the more confused I am. Seems "everyone" created an LLC this year! I used to think I knew the answere & would file a partnership return but after reading what others do, now I am not so sure.

Solomon (talk|edits) said:

31 March 2008
Joanmcq: Still one Sch C and two SE's in a community property state. Rev. Proc. 2002-69 has not been superseded.

Abelletete (talk|edits) said:

5 April 2008
Below is copied from the IRS website at this address: http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=177376,00.html

Election for Husband and Wife Unincorporated Businesses

An unincorporated business jointly owned by a married couple is generally classified as a partnership for Federal tax purposes. For tax years beginning after December 31, 2006, the Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-28) provides that a “qualified joint venture,” whose only members are a husband and a wife filing a joint return, can elect not to be treated as a partnership for Federal tax purposes.

A business owned and operated by the spouses through a limited liability company does not qualify for the election Only businesses that are owned and operated by spouses as co-owners (and not in the name of a state law entity) qualify for the election. See Rev. Proc. 2002-69, 2002-2 C.B. 831, for special rules applicable to husband and wife state law entities in community property states.

Wwtaxes (talk|edits) said:

21 April 2008
In reading through this site, I have read many conflicting positions on this topic. Even in this one discussion, there are conflicting opinions. I would like to see if we can get some consensus on this. For now, let's assume not a community property state.

From the IRS page cited above, I read this as: a H/W rental can file a single schedule E, and both get part of the SE earnings, however, only if they are NOT an LLC. So if you want the LLC protection, you need to file a partnership return. Is this the ruling in a nutshell?

If so, do you recommend to clients in this situation that they just buy the rental personally and get a good insurance policy, or do you recommend that they file the partnership return as an LLC? (I know you're going to say that the client needs to make this decision, but you know they will ask what you recommend anyway.)

If they file as an LLC, I assume they need to put the property in the LLC's name. Does the loan also need to be in the LLC's name?

Mpt1123 (talk|edits) said:

23 April 2008
Hello. A great, and timely, discussion.

Can I get a recommendation on the following situation?

I'm about to start a business that purchases small properties that need improvements. I'll make the improvements, then rent the property. I plan on creating an LLC. I'm concerned about protecting my personal assets. Almost all of my assets are jointly owned by my wife and I, with the exception of my 401(k) and pension. I'm still employed and expect to retire in a couple of years. I'm thinking about using my wife as the sole proprietor of the LLC with me as trustee. I believe that will protect any joint assets. Will that protect my 401(k) and pension as well? The only problem with this plan is that I am the primary earner in the family, so my income is critical to getting any loans.

Bottom line...I want to make sure that I protect all of our current and future (401K and pension) assets.

Thanks.

Blrgcpa (talk|edits) said:

23 April 2008
Profile please for an answer. this is not for DIYers. You need a good atty and a cpa or EA.

LNESQ (talk|edits) said:

23 July 2008
Does anyone know how to designate a husband wife LLC when obtaining an EIN number? You must elect either S-Corp or association taxed as a corporation, or accept the default of a partnership. Since the LLC is for rental properties, and seems to be a QJV, it is not a partnership. I'd like my clients to be able to avoid filing a corporate return. Any suggestions? Those who are having their clients do two schedule C's, are you just ignoring the status created at time of EIN application?

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

23 July 2008
I think we determined that QJV does NOT include rentals that don't rise to the level of a business.

I think we also determined that LLCs don't qualify as QJVs.

but since you are new here, LN, and as of yet have no profile we can assume that you haven't been keeping up with our discussions. Try the yellow search box on the upper left. I'll give you enormous credit for searching and finding this thread.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

July 23, 2008
Agree. The recent issue of NATP's Tax Pro Monthly had an excellent article on this, and concludes the same. H/W can only skip the 1065 IF they are NOT set up as a legal entity, like an LLC. So mere joint ownership goes to Sch. E. LLC requires 1065 at this time. Stupid, to me, but it is what it is.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

23 July 2008
I don't think lnESQ is a tax professional - I think he is an attorney. (a tax pro would not use Sch C for a rental that doesn't rise to the level of a business?)

in which case he should not be giving tax advice, he should be referring his legal clients to a local tax pro, just like we refer our tax clients to an attorney for their legal questions

LNESQ (talk|edits) said:

23 July 2008
You are right. I am an attorney and I will be sending my clients to a local tax professional, once their LLC is established. I simply was wondering whether you all suggested allowing the default partnership (since the rules state that it's not one) when applying for the EIN or if you felt it shoud be an association taxed as a corporation. I didn't want to give you tax professionals the headaches you seem to be having in these types of cases.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

July 23, 2008
Oh, laydown easy, yes, default partnership status. NEVER EVER NO NOT EVER allow Real estate into a corp. Immediate grounds for malpractice on that one.

Kevinh5 (talk|edits) said:

23 July 2008
and if any of your local accountants DO allow real estate in a corp (or LLC taxed as any form of corp), never refer to them. They don't know what they are doing.

(real estate refers to real estate to be held (office, rental, investment), not real estate to be sold in the course of business (flipping, rehab & sale, buider, developer) - that type of businss could be incorporated with no extra problems)

LNESQ (talk|edits) said:

23 July 2008
Thank you very much.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

July 23, 2008
Good point Kevin. I need to include that clarification...

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums