Discussion:How to pay distribution in S-Corp
From TaxAlmanac
Discussion Forum Index --> Consumer Questions --> How to pay distribution in S-Corp
| 7 January 2007 | |
| I am the sole owner in S-Corp and I need to pay myself a dividend/distribution. I have already used my payroll company to pay myself a salary. How do I take the distribution portion? Do i just write myself a check and cash that check? If so, how do I pay the federal and social security taxes? Do I have to pay those taxes now, or will those be taken care when I file the taxes for the year. Please advise. | |
| 7 January 2007 | |
| To take a distribution from an S-Corp, simply write yourself a check. This amount is not deductible to the S-Corp, nor is it taxable to you, the shareholder. You pay income tax on the income from the S-Corp as reported on the K-1 from the S-Corp. This income will not be subject to social security or self-employment tax. | |
Michaelstar (talk|edits) said: | 7 January 2007 |
| The distribution will also reduce your s/h basis. | |
| 7 January 2007 | |
| Thanks for your replies. If I write myself a check, do I still have to pay Fed and state taxes (estimated) when I withdraw the money OR is it going to be taken care when I file taxes for the year? | |
| January 7, 2007 | |
| You pay tax on the profit remaining after all expenses and salary, regardless of whether you take money out or not. Taking the money isn't a taxable event, normally. Earning the profit is. | |
| 1 March 2007 | |
| I'm trying to determine if I should change my business entity from a single-owner LLC to an S-Corp. While I understand that doing so will save me a considerable amount in SE tax, I'm confused about how distributions from an S-Corp to a sole-owner are taxed.
Here's a hypothetical. If my S-Corp has net profits of 130k and I take a "reasonable salary" of 65k for my profession, I know that I would only pay SE tax on the 65k salary vice the first $94,200 for 2006 as an LLC. If I then wanted to pay myself the remaining 65k at the end of the year as a "distribution" is this amount tax free???? Thanks! | |
| March 1, 2007 | |
| Free of SS taxes. Not income taxes. Your profits are what are taxed, technically, so the distribution isn't, it's merely taking the money that is being taxed, if that makes sense. | |
| 1 March 2007 | |
| Take a reasonable salary and the rest as distribution free of social security tax. I once attended a seminar that said "stay consistent with your salary even if it is low, (in this case it was 30,000) to establish an amount - and take the rest as distribution".. I personally have been following this little piece of advice! | |
Malinowski (talk|edits) said: | 1 March 2007 |
| Be sure that you have enough basis to cover your non taxable distributions. | |
| 1 March 2007 | |
| ...any distribution over your basis results in a capital gain. | |
| 1 March 2007 | |
| You should seriously have learned more about a S-Corp before forming one. Find an accountant in your area and pay him to do his job before you wind up with excess distributions or worse... | |
| 2 March 2007 | |
| There are those that say that just paying out the undistributed earnings when the shareholder needs the money is incorrect. That a corp resolution must be done to pay out the distribution. I would guess very few do this in practice. Also if there are more than one shareholder, these distributions should be paid on an equal basis, as there are no special allocations in an S-corp. | |
| 2 March 2007 | |
| I could go on about stock basis, but sir, get an accountant, please.
Thank you. | |
Sapper2007 (talk|edits) said: | 1 April 2007 |
| Could someone help me out here. I am the sole owner of an S-Corp. I don't draw a salary but instead do a distribution from S-corp. My old accountant used to file form Schedule SE to figure the Self-employment tax. This is how he has done it for me for years. However this year I decided to use Taxcut to do my taxes for business and personal. The problem is that when I do a distribution from S-corp and bring the total in from the K-1 statement, the program does not fill in the schedule SE and thus does not compute self-employment tax. Is this correct, or was my old accountant correct? Should I override the fields on the Schedule SE to compute self-employment tax? Last year I made well over the $94,200 limit. Thanks for your help. | |
| 1 April 2007 | |
| where should we even begin?
or shoud we just direct her to the dozens of threads on compensation/payroll/salary? | |
| 1 April 2007 | |
| Sapper, use the search field in the yellow to the left near the top.
All the free help you need will be there. | |
Sapper2007 (talk|edits) said: | 1 April 2007 |
| Kevin,
I have not been able to find the answer to my question, that's why I posted my question. Thanks, Phil | |
| 1 April 2007 | |
| You have been using an accountant who didn't know what he was doing at all. You should have been on a reasonable salary all along. Search S Corp salary. | |
Sapper2007 (talk|edits) said: | 1 April 2007 |
| I'll do that. Thanks Kevin. | |
| 1 April 2007 | |
| You s/b on p/r from the s corp. The prior acct should have told you that. By taking a distribution and no p/r, you were evading p/r tax, and that's illegal!
The IRS can have a party with that. | |
Sapper2007 (talk|edits) said: | 1 April 2007 |
| Hi Blrgcpa. What does s/b on p/r mean? My old acct would take the distribution, but then file a schedule SE on the whole amount, which sometimes was over 150k. So I wonder if I was paying more tax than I should have been. | |
| 1 April 2007 | |
| should be.....payroll.... You old accountant should have put you on payroll for your time spent. He did not. He is an idiot. Any more questions...ask JR or Kevin. They might be more direct. | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 1 April 2007 |
| Corporate tax returns are complex things. I STRONGLY suggest that you hire a professional and do not try to do this yourself. What your prior accountant was doing via self employment tax was evading payroll tax and appears to be illegal as Blrgcpa says. Even if you were paying self employment tax on the entire amount of the corp's earnings, Unemployment taxes were not paid to the federal and state governments. If self employment tax was not paid on the entire earnings, the IRS can come in and void the corporate status. | |
| 1 April 2007 | |
| Bottom Line...what basis would the IRS have to void the corporate status? I don't see how this issue risks corporate status. | |
Sapper2007 (talk|edits) said: | 2 April 2007 |
| Isn't it kind of late in the game to issue W-2's for last year? Why not report it all as a distribution from S-corp and fill in schedule SE for the total income? | |
| 2 April 2007 | |
| Doesn't it depend on which rules you want to break?
You could issue the W2 late, but follow the rest of the rules. Or you could issue a 1099 (also late) and break the S Corp salary rules, but at least pay SE tax. Or you could do what your old accountant did and just run all profits through Schedule SE without a 1099 and break even more rules, but still at least pay SE tax. So it's all relative whether it's too late to issue a W2. I agree to find a professional who knows what they're doing, but I also think that's easier said than done (you already had one that you thought knew what he was doing, right?). Try finding one through a referral, or maybe someone on this site is near you. | |
Bottom Line (talk|edits) said: | 2 April 2007 |
| Since payroll has not been done for many years, it is possible for the corporate return to be kicked out for review. I cannot determine from the OP how much of the income SE tax was paid on. Therefore, the "reasonable salary" question comes into play. This business appears to have been run as a sole-P instead of a corp. As we all know, a lot depends upon the IRS auditor but do we really want to give them something else to look at? | |
Sapper2007 (talk|edits) said: | 2 April 2007 |
| Thanks for the advice. Will do. | |
| 25 June 2007 | |
| Does it matter when an S corp distribution is taken? For example, given the S corp tax year typically ends at the end of the calendar year, as long as the standard salary is being paid, is there anything wrong with taking a distribution say in July instead of waiting until the end of the calendar year? Just wondering if there are rules on when S corp distributions can be taken. | |
| 25 June 2007 | |
| No , not that I am aware of.
However I usually try to make the distributions quarterly, bi-annually or annually. This way they at least resemble something like dividends or distributions and not payroll. | |
| 25 June 2007 | |
| After reading posts like these I don't think the IRS is even looking at reasonable wages in an S corp. How could someone get away with this year after year? Maybe the IRS sees "self prepared" at the bottom of the return and they are afraid to audit because they will have the same salary/distribution discussion that is posted time after time on this site.
Imagine how old that would get. I am completely paranoid about this and constantly hound my clients to get on quarterly payroll. I hope I'm not wasting my clients' time and money. I imagine that agents are evaluated based on adjustment dollars per audit. Are adjustments to payroll taxes (in the case of a reasonable wage audit) given the same value as adjustments to federal income taxes? I would think so, but I don't hear about many reasonable comp audits, and based on this site there are many who don't follow the rules. | |
| 26 June 2007 | |
| Ptj, it makes no difference when you make the distribution. You can do it whenever you need the money. You're taking out earnings that have been, or will be, taxed as flowthrough income on your individual income tax return. The distribution reduces your basis in the stock, but otherwise has no tax consequence, regardless of the timing. However, distributions cannot reduce your basis below zero. Any distribution in excess of your basis would be taxable capital gain to you, so just be sure you don't take too much. | |
TLCTaxGirlAZ (talk|edits) said: | 26 June 2007 |
| My head is spinning after reading some things that accountants are doing to their clients. WOW! It is very important that S-Corp people take a salary, I know that. BUT...
I have a client that was set-up as an S-Corp a little too soon but what is done is done. He is not making hardly enough to stay a float, he is taking a small salary; does he have to take a salary in his situation? --TLCTaxGirlAZ 19:36, 25 June 2007 (CDT) | |
| 26 June 2007 | |
| Thanks for the response KatieJ. I'm continuing to take a salary through my C corp to S corp conversion. In the past, at the end of my C corp fiscal year, I'd pay myself a bonus (and just take my lumps on the payroll taxes etc). Since I'm going through my S corp conversion where my C corp becomes an S corp effective July 1, and, as you say, I can take a distribution anytime I want as long as I don't pull too much out, it makes sense for me to pay the 15% C corporate tax on the retained earnings (no choice there, as the money is already in the C corp), then take it as a distribution under the S corp in July. This at least saves paying payroll tax on that distribution.
Its gonna be interesting from a 1040 perspective, dealing with the inflow of taxable income from the S corp at the end of the year. With the C corp I could always leave money in the C corp, pay the 15% tax and not drive my personal tax rate off the cliff. Doesn't sound like I'll have too much control with the S corp. | |
| 26 June 2007 | |
| Ptj, your situation is complicated because your corporation has C corp earnings and profits. Whenever the C corp E&P is distributed to you, it will be a taxable dividend, not a distribution of "previously or soon-to-be taxed" income. It may be a good idea to clean out the C Corp E&P now, before the S election is effective. Once the S election is effective, distributions are treated first as distributions of current year earnings, and any excess goes into the C Corp E&P and is a dividend. Or you can elect to take a distribution first from the C Corp E&P to clean it out after the S election is effective.
I hope you have good professional advice in this process. It's not a do-it-yourself project. There are more pitfalls and complexities than we can explain to you in this forum, all depending very much on your own facts and circumstances. The help of a qualified adviser will be more than worth what it costs. | |
| 27 June 2007 | |
| Takke a dividend of the c corp earnings now while it's still a c corp. You won't be able to get it when the corp becomes an s. | |
| 27 June 2007 | |
| Hmmm, I'm wondering why I'd take it as a dividend instead of just paying myself a bonus from the C corp. As I understand things, a dividend isn't deductible to the C corp. It may be that a dividend payment from the C corp avoids payroll taxes though so that may be the advantage. | |
| 27 June 2007 | |
| I ran a quickbooks report last night, and it looks like the cash I have in the C corp is in retained earnings. Most of this years income to the business thus far, has been paid out in payroll. Does it still make sense to do anything with the retained earnings cash in the C corp sitting in retained earnings before the cutover to an S corp on July 1? I guess I was thinking I had more profits from this year sitting there than I do. Given the money is in retained earnings and has already been taxed once, a dividend payment from the C corp doesn't make much sense to me but there may be some advantage I'm missing. | |
| 27 June 2007 | |
| Blrg, I think you need to take a course on S corps. You seem to be stuck on the idea that C corp retained earnings are frozen when an S election is made. http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Discussion:S-Corp_Dividend_%28not_Distribution%29
The C corp dividends are still available to pay dividends. Reread KatieJ's post. | |
| 27 June 2007 | |
| Ptj, the C corp E&P will be taxable income to you as a dividend whenever you receive it as a distribution, either before or after the S election is effective. There is no particular reason to distribute it now, although many people are cleaning C corp E&P out of S corporations nowadays to take advantage of the low dividend tax rates, which theoretically expire in 2010 or 2012, I forget which. You are correct that a dividend distribution is not deductible by the corporation. If the corporation needs the cash for its normal operations, and you don't need it for personal expenses, you can leave it in there.
S corporations with C corp E&P are subject to some special, fairly complicated rules. They have to keep track of their income that is distributable tax-free to their stockholders with an accumulated adjustments account (AAA), and the rules for that are somewhat complex. They are also subject to involuntary termination of the S election if they have too much passive income. You should be talking with a qualified tax adviser who can explain all of these matters to you with access to all of the relevant information about your business. Don't try to do this yourself. | |
| 28 June 2007 | |
| KatieJ, I think the reason many people are electing to clear out AE&P now as taxable dividends is due to the belief, not any certainty in the law as it now stands, that after the 2008 elections the 15% rate on qualified dividends may go away and we will be back to the way it was prior to 2003 when dividends were taxed as ordinary income. While it is not a certainty that the rates will revert all the way back to the way they were then, it is a virtual certainty they will go no lower than they currently are. | |
| 30 June 2007 | |
| Oh, thanks, Jdugan. Somewhere I got the idea that the special dividend rates would sunset in 2010 along with other parts of the Bush tax cuts, but I hadn't looked it up. | |
Theschmu22 (talk|edits) said: | 25 September 2007 |
| I found out earlier in teh year that my accountant was not properly doing my taxes. I have found more than 20k in expenses not accounted for. Before dumping it, i filed an extension. I took dividends from our S-corp all year. I took out and paid fed and state taxes on those dividends comporable to the percentages of fed/state on my salary. in years previous, the acct would submit those dividends and act like i never paid taxes on them, lending me to be taxed twice. Yes, I have a mess to fix. What form do I use to report those dividends and what taxes I withheld? I looked at 1099Div, but i do not know which box applies to my kind of dividend. Also, there is not a box for state taxes withheld. other than this issue, I have corrected everything else. If he hadn't handed me a bill for 9k, I never would have looked into all of this. Thankyou for any help. | |
| 25 September 2007 | |
| First, has the corporation been an S corp since inception? If so, the "dividends" you have paid yourself were, in fact, "S distributions" and are usually not taxable at the time they are paid (I say usually, because if you pay yourself more in distributions than you have been taxed on through your K-1, the excess could be taxable to you). S distributions are not reportable on Form 1099-DIV. That form is for reporting "dividends" which in the tax world are distributions from C corporation retained earnings.
Secondly, you state you took out and paid fed & state taxes on the "dividends." How did you do this? Those taxes would normally not be paid like P/R withholding but would be paid as estimated tax deposits. They should have been reflected as tax payments on your individual return. If they were paid by the corp, they should have been treated as additional dividends. Sorry you got dinged for $9k by your present/former accountant. You don't say what form your records are kept in. My guess is that they were not in very good shape. I hate to say you should see someone else but, maybe you should see someone else. | |
Theschmu22 (talk|edits) said: | 26 September 2007 |
| crap. s corp from inception. i was already on my second cpa. after paying out the butt the first year, he told me to take out taxes. before i bailed on him, he told me i needed to fill out a 1099div to show i already paid taxes on the 'distributions' for 06. i use quickbooks. i set up another type of reimbursement categorized so we would recognize it. i selected arbitrary taxes to be withheld from teh distribution for state and fed tax purposes. so when i would do my 941's every month, those taxes withheld went to each agency. QB always tallies up what i owe for each month in the quarter and fills out the 941 summary. so, inferring from what has been said here, i have screwed up my 941's. i had 13.5k in dividends last year and paid more than 2k in fed and state taxes already. i guess its not easy to fix this. i may have to get another accountant and another extension. is it normal to get bad advice so often, or am i just a bad luck magnet? thanks. | |
| 26 September 2007 | |
| I agree with Jdugancpa that you do need professional help. Some musings on the subject:
1. Don't rely on QB as a good source of accounting data for your accountant, unless a qualified bookkeeper is doing the data entry. This board is given to us by Intuit, but contrary to QB advertising one cannot necessarily do accounting correctly simply because they use QB. Some accountants I know want their smaller clients to use Quicken (another Intuit product, by the way) simply because Quicken cannot be messed up by inexpert bookkeeping as badly as QB can. 2. Make sure you find an accountant who will work with you during the year, not just at tax preparation time. Find somebody who will take the time to explain S corp tax issues. Based on your message, you are not clear on that subject. 3. Make sure you listen to the professional advice you are given. This year I lost a client who was outraged because he owed $20K on his 1040, which included a flow-through from an S corp. He was counting on a refund, even though he refused to make tax payments I had been telling him to make since early 2006. Almost every professional on this board probably has had a situation like that; be careful not to be that kind of client. | |
| 26 September 2007 | |
| By the way, there isn't a second extension on your 1120S or on your 1040. The date you want to shoot for is October 15th to get them both done.
Also, contact the IRS to find out what exactly you have paid on your 941s and withholding (your SSN). Most likely you would be able to have the taxes "withheld" on your dividends treated as estimated payments. It does sound like your 941s are messed up for 2006. One quick check you can do is to add up the taxable wages on the first page of your 941s and compare this number to your W-3. The IRS will do this eventually anyway. | |
Theschmu22 (talk|edits) said: | 27 September 2007 |
| my s corp questions are answered, mostly, but i have to know what i am looking for. they haven't really filled me in on what i dont already have a clue on....that equals my current state of confusion. i appreciate the advice. some things are screwed up in QB, but I ahve always given them a "map" of what is where. It just never translated into a proper return. Its not that I have ever tried to get out of taxes, I have been paying too much. Now i have to look at the last 3 years too. some of the expenses were not listed, and there is 2/3 years i paid taxes on distributions that were not accounted for. A lot fo work to be done. Thanks folks. | |
| September 27, 2007 | |
| Prev. 3 years can be amended if there are errors, but it's hard to tell what's really going on here. Could just be a lot of misunderstanding and accountants who cannot explain themselves well. Find a good, small biz accountant who is very familiar with S corps. When you explain your situation, if their eyes glaze over, stop and leave. Yours is a very common situation and is easily handled by anyone who knows what they're doing. Well, assuming that you're willing to let them...ok? | |
| 4 October 2007 | |
| I’m a small business owner and I have a few questions about taxes on the distributions I take from my S corp. I do have an accountant, but I haven’t been able to understand the way he has answered my question. I was told to save about 30% for year end income taxes, but I don’t know if I should be holding 30% of all money coming in or 30% of the paid distributions, only.
I just started my business and for the first month or so I have taken only distributions. And covered business related deductions. I now take a reasonable salary, and the money that is paid to my S corp comes from an LLC I’m just going to give you real amounts because it’s eaisier… monies deposited to my PC from the LLC total $18533.50 over 4 pay periods Each time money was deposited to my PC from the LLC, before paying myself a distribution or paying for deductions, I deposited 30% of that amount to a savings account for yr end taxes Thus I've deposited a total of $5560.05 or 30% of $18533.50 I've drawn distributions from the $18533.50 only 3 times...when needed, for a total of $9056.09 30% of $9056.09 is $2716.83 Am I correct in thinking that I have over saved $2843.22 for income taxes ($5560.05<what has been deposited> minus $2716.83<what I think should have been deposited>) So, should I only be saving 30% of the distributions paid to my personal account, and not 30% of the full amount coming into my PC from the LLC? Say I only take $2000 of that $6000 each month the rest goes toward business deductions, the SEP IRA we spoke about, or just sits. If this is the case, should I only be saving 30% of that $2000 or $600 ? In my example: My PC gets 11,000 per month from the LLC. $5000 is paid as a salary starting OCT 1st. I was told to give to myself... $3767.50 of that salary and save the rest for monthly taxes. Thus $6000 is left over. Say my wife gets a great job when she returns from her Yoga training and we don't need any of that left over $6000 to cover our fixed personal living expenses. We decide that we can live on my 3767.50 per month and whatever else she brings in. But in December we decided to draw $2000 to help cover the Holiday expenses. I would pay to my personal account $2000 and then save 30% of that $2000 or $600 for taxes. Can the remainder of the money each month (ie the $6000 minus any business deductions) sit in a holding account until I need it or until the end of the tax year? And then, when I need it, or at the end of the year I can take out my 30% tax on whatever I draw? | |
TheTinCook (talk|edits) said: | 4 October 2007 |
| You are taxed on the corp's profit regardless of how much you take as a distribution. You should have asked your accountant to explain it. | |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| I think I've read all discussions on concerning scorp distributions on here but I'm still confused. First year as scorp and never been C. Did all the proper salary, w-2, 741's et al. I use QB and Turbo Tax business and both are happy with my entries and everything balances and everything shows where appropiate - K-1 16d, Sch L, M-1, M2 etc. My question is this: If an equity distribution is supposedly tax-free, why doesn't it deduct from operating expenses on 1120s? I'm still paying tax on it since the distribution is included in profit. It also skews the retained earnings acct because it includes the distribution amount there even though that cash has already been paid. Did I miss something? | |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| If you've read above, you would see that your profit is taxed regardless of whether you took an equity distribution of it or not. It is NOT a corporate operating expense and should not be showing as an operating expense. Trust your program when it deducts it from retained earnings. If you want more explanations, find a good accountant. | |
| February 4, 2008 | |
| Find one anyway. This isn't a DIY sport, having an S corp. A good one pays for himself easily. | |
| 4 February 2008 | |
| Understood on seeking professional help(and not just for accounting either).
That being the case, it seems to make more sense to loan all start up captital to the corp instead of having shareholder equity. That way the loan payments are an expense deduction and I only have to pay tax on the interest and the principal really would be returned to me tax free. | |
| February 4, 2008 | |
| The "principal" would be returned tax-free (in general) whether it was debt or equity. You really shouldn't be making these decisions yourself if you're not getting that. | |
| February 4, 2008 | |
| Except that when inc'ing, Sec. 351 precludes starting with debt. AND if debt exceeds assets, you're really hosed. | |
| 1 February 2009 | |
| My company has four owners 40-20-20-20. We formed the S-corp with money raised through donations. We were an LLC and now we're filing as a S-Corp. Here's the situation:
Basically, our net profit from 2003 through 2008 is $992.65. That is not the same amount as our starting bank balance for 2009 though, which is $8,727.87. The $7,734.92 differential is additional cash on hand that predated our incorporation. Since we have no obligations in the form of debt, loans, or other partners/investors, it’s considered to be money that we put into the business up front as a cash reserve (and there is no other record on this earth as to where it came from). There really wasn’t any other way to slice it, since the statute of limitations on any potential income we realized prior to 2003 has long passed. We also didn’t need to file any tax returns before 2003 when we incorporated and started to incur significant expenses. This means that we will show that we still have a balance of $2,534.92 invested in the business. We can take a tax free repayment on it in the future. Does this sound correct to you? Also, would assuming that we each invested the same about upfront be grounds claiming a different dividend distribution than 40-20-20-20? Thanks. | |
| 1 February 2009 | |
| Thoughts off the top of my head, having not dealt with an S corp in almost a year:
1. I don't know how you got to $2,534.92 - you didn't mention any distributions at all. 2. Income is allocated to S corp owners each year, and the allocation must be in proportion to their relative stock ownership percentages. If I picked up this account, I would probably treat the $7,734.92 as paid-in capital and allocate it evenly, but then it wouldn't be available for tax-free distribution. 3. I don't know what "money raised from donations" means. From whom? Why are you entitled to treat that as your money? 4. An S corp owner is free to take any distribution he wants as long as there's money in his undistributed earnings account. One owner taking a distribution doesn't require the others to take one. BTW, I am a fan of DC United, and will be until AC Philadelphia takes the field in 2010. | |
Rgtaxservice (talk|edits) said: | 1 February 2009 |
| One owner taking a distribution doesn't require the others to take one.
That's not true. S Corp distributions, as a whole, must allocated to shareholders based on ownership percentages. If the S Corp distribution is 10K, then each shareholder must receive their allocated percentage. If you don't, you create a second class of stock and that will blow the S Corp election. | |
| 1 February 2009 | |
| Thanks for the responses rgtax and AEM(and I just moved from Philly.)
I see I left out a critical number... there was a $5200 disbursement in 08 that's being treated as a repayment of invested cash by our accountant who tells us that because it's a "repayment" we don't have to claim it. "Money raised from donations" is just that. It's a website that was initially funded by donations, but has now turned into a self-sustaining business. I don't know why we're entitled to treat it as our money, that doesn't make sense to me. | |
| 1 February 2009 | |
| I worked a small CPA firm for 5 years. We had 11 clients that are S corps, and my old boss tracks AAA by individual shareholders and allows disproportionate distributions for every one of them (well, all the ones that have multiple shareholders). I wasn't a CPA during the time I worked for him, and I basically followed his templates for preparing tax returns for him.
But you're absolutely right and he's dead wrong. I'm kind of in shock right now. If you were in my position, would you do anything? I still have somewhat of a personal friendship with my old boss, but I don't think I'm in a position to tell him the basics of S corp (he's 60 and I'm 30). Thoughts? | |
| 1 February 2009 | |
| Were you originally non-profit? I guess you could just treat it as prior year revenue and therefore income.... | |
| February 1, 2009 | |
| So many questions. How did you go from nonprofit to S corp? And why? Do those previous stakeholders have any ownership strings at all? I guess I'd probably just credit each of the new owners with the unappropriated retained earnings from prior as well...but the whole thing seems a bit unusual. And I probably wouldn't give you basis for that money since it wasn't yours...making it even goofier. Sorry, more unusual. | |
| 1 February 2009 | |
| Ah, part of this is my own ignorance. We weren't a 501c3, we just zeroed out our balances every year. There were no stakeholders at all before, it was pretty much an off the books company. People sent us money, we spent it on running the site and didn't file as a company. It was essentially not a company before, but a group of people (300) paying expenses on a site we ran for them. We incorporated because it got pretty big and wanted to establish ownership. | |
| February 1, 2009 | |
| Some bell rings in me that says a chat with an attorney is in order here. Nothing to alarm, but just to line up all the ducks and make sure one isn't flying off the pond! | |
| 1 February 2009 | |
| Thanks. Just for direction, what ducks would you be worried about? | |
| 2 February 2009 | |
| You decided to make this a profit company (S. Corp.). Even before then, you were likely a common law partnerhsip. So, you are talking about revenue, not donations. Sounds too complicated to go through the forensics of it here United, and I think you need some professional help as well. | |
| February 2, 2009 | |
| Yeah, whose money is this, how do you convert from NFP to for profit and what does all that mean, should you get basis for the intial investment which is merely the unappropriated earnings, etc. It just needs to get talked out is all. But I doubt that hardly any other pro has seen this either... | |
KurtJohnston (talk|edits) said: | 10 April 2009 |
| I have had an s-corp for 11 years with steady business paying myself $100,000 a year with very little profits left over. This past year I gained some big clients and increased my salary to $160,000, but still had additional profits of $400,000 that I was taxed on personally as the only shareholder. These taxes are over half of what I paid myself all year! I now have the remaining $300,000 in my business account. Do I pay that to myself as a distribution or is it too much and the IRS will reclassify it or something? My accountant says I can only take a max distribution of $20,000 that doesn't even cover the taxes I was hit with. Thanks for your time and help! | |
| 10 April 2009 | |
| You can take it all given the limited facts presented. There is no "maximum" distribution. I would certainly distribute enough to pay the taxes. | |
KurtJohnston (talk|edits) said: | 11 April 2009 |
| Thanks Rk. After reading this entire discussion and an even longer discussion on the topic called "S Corp Owner Salary vs. Distributions" I was still confused. There seems to be two opinions. One opinion that you can take any distribution amount as long as the salary is a reasonable amount, and a second opinion that it should be around 60/40 or you risk an audit and the IRS interpretation of what is considered a reasonable salary. My accountant is heavy on the second opinion and advising more around 80/20 where I can't even pay the taxes as mentioned. | |
Nmayweather (talk|edits) said: | 14 April 2009 |
| KurtJohnston-
The salary should be a reasonable amount to someone in your profession. Say you own a pet store, you manage it, and your profit that year is 1MM. Should you take a 600k salary? An 800k salary? If it benefits you, you take a 100k salary -- because your assistant managers all make 50k, and your last job when you worked at a corporate pet store you made 70k as a manager. If the IRS says "well you perform the duties of a CEO of the pet chain who is making 500k", you reply: "I work in the stores. I don't manage a CMO, CTO, CIO, marketing initiatives, press, nor am i responsible for thousands of employees." Reasonable salary means you treat the company like a company -- it's sole obligation is to maximize profits for shareholders, which includes paying the smallest salary possible in order to keep employees happy. | |
Nmayweather (talk|edits) said: | 14 April 2009 |
| I should also add.. you may want to justify higher payments in some circumstances too.
NYC doesn't recognize an S-Corp , so it may be considerably cheaper in certain situations to pay a higher salary | |
Floridamike13 (talk|edits) said: | 29 September 2009 |
| We have 4 members of our S-Corporation. My wife and I make up 50%, while 25% is a brother in law and 25% held in a trust for a sister-inlaw. On average we are only taking $3,000.00/month in distributions. On average, my wife and I pay about $30,000.00 in taxes each year for our 50% split. I'd like to increase the distributions to $4,000.00/month. See any problem based upon what we pay in taxes? Should we be taking more? | |
| September 29, 2009 | |
| Well, Mike, distributions are merely based on cash available, but do need to be made only in proportion to stock ownership. So what you and your wife take should be what your bro and sis in laws take, proportionally. The unspoken issue is salary. That one matters, it needs to be reasonable for services in that area. Then, distributions. And those are whatever you can afford. | |
Floridamike13 (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2009 |
| So a basic salary should be taken along side a distribution. Say, the salary is $3,000.00/month and the monthly distribution is $1,000.00/month that should work? How does this affect end of year taxes? | |
Floridamike13 (talk|edits) said: | 30 September 2009 |
| So a basic salary should be taken along side a distribution. Say, the salary is $3,000.00/month and the monthly distribution is $1,000.00/month that should work? How does this affect end of year taxes? | |
| September 30, 2009 | |
| Again, the distribution has NOTHING to do with taxes. Income tax on the 1040 will be based on the 36k salary and whatever profits are allocated on the K1, regardless of distributions. (for the anal, I note that excess distributions MAY cause added tax if not handled properly) | |
| 30 September 2009 | |
| Mike, your questions suggest that you do not understand how S corporations work. You will pay tax on your distributive share of the net income of the corporation (after deducting your salary, which also is taxable income to you). Since you have already paid tax on your share of the corporation's net earnings, or will pay tax on it at the end of the year, there is no tax consequence when those funds are distributed to you. Your tax bill is the same whether you take all, some, or none of the net income in the form of distributions.
There are some potential pitfalls, though. For example, distributions, unlike salaries, must be proportional to stock ownership; that is, if you and your wife receive a distribution of $10, your BIL and your SIL's trust must each receive $5. Otherwise the corporation's Subchapter S election could be invalid. In addition, if you receive distributions in excess of your basis in the corporation, that excess amount will be taxable income to you. S corporations are not do-it-yourself projects. The rules are complicated and it is easy to make expensive mistakes. Get yourself to a competent tax professional as soon as possible. Only a professional who has access to all of the facts and circumstances of your particular situation can advise you properly. | |


