Discussion:How to over come "I am charging too much?"

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> How to over come "I am charging too much?"

Inagpurwala (talk|edits) said:

19 May 2008
Every tax season (for last four season) I get this fear. I may be charging more compare to other tax pro in town ( I know I do not) and client will fly away.

This season two clients in fact told me that my fees are "much lower than HRB and other they checked out." One client paid me $25.00 more than I had invoiced him!

Generaly I charge starting $75. (for basic 1040A) and up to $350 (1040 with Sch A and D). I do not do Business tax returns. I am in Fremont, CA area. There are few Tax Preparers in this area who charges between $25. and $100 for the same services! I am not sure if they are registered with CTEC or sign the return. I have only seen their posting on Craigs List.

Any suggestion(s) greatly appreciated. I just do not want to loose clints.

Thxs IshaqInagpurwala 17:51, 19 May 2008 (CDT)

Waynecpa (talk|edits) said:

19 May 2008
My perfect client is one who doesn't price shop, but "service" shops for the best CPA/tax preparer. If you are good, you will be saving your client much more than you are charging in either less taxes or less headaches.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
CTEC registrations are available to the public. Go to the CTEC website and run a search. If they aren't registered with CTEC, narc on them.

Stick to your guns. Confidence will get you farther then an apologetic shamefaced display. Have a ready answer as to why you are worth that much. If you do returns in front of clients, remember that you are getting paid for your skill and knowledge and not your time. You might want to try ways of bringing the money issue upfront so that clients aren't getting hit by sticker shock. Remember, if you discount too much or too often, then you are bound to get abused.

This last season I inherited a client who had $150 taken off last year's bill. She pitched a fit when she didn't get the same thing this year. I was ready to let her walk rather then apply any discount, especially since she took up several hours of my time for a simple return. She ended up with $25 off and a spot on CTOBET.

Most of those price shoppers are a waste of your time, so don't feel bad about losing them. However, I'll take a price shopper over a refund shopper anytime.

DZCPA (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
Charge more. You are too low. Let the price shoppers go to the other preparers. Those clients will come to you in a few years after the other preparers mess up.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
Watch your multi-state returns too. I got really stalled by a couple of state issues, which if not for this board, and one nice lady at my state DOR, I'd probably still be working on! This is from my inexperience, but I will try to get a handle on state tax issues when first meeting with clients now, and before quoting the fee.

Snowbird (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
Your may have already researchd fees ... but here is link to some information you may find useful.

Tax Preparation Fees

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
"Every tax season (for last four season) I get this fear. I may be charging more compare to other tax pro in town ( I know I do not) and client will fly away."

Working on eliminating this fear is your most important goal, not setting the proper fee. Two preparers are not like the gas stations of the 60s, where you will be having price wars. It is the value you incorporate into your services that you must collect. You can't show your clients these studies and tell them 'so and so says this is an average fee' because the good clients won't care while the bad clients will dispute it.

This past month a client called to tell me that I and his dentist were the last great bargains of this world. Now I am not sure how to take such a comment.

94nole (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
If you aren't scaring off some of your customers (because these types are customers, not clients) because of price, you aren't charging enough.

Also, it's the price-shoppers who will cost you the most to serve because they will call you more, withhold information and then "magically" find it requiring you to re-print, etc. To those, I say, See ya!

Larousse (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
I know there are preparers in my town who charge a little less. There are also many more who charge much more. Somehow, no matter what I charge, I'm busy all season long so I don't think I'm pricing myself out of the market. If you're concerned, I'd ask myself: how much did I actually take home per hour worked last season? Does that feel like enough? Also, you could do some marketing research: send a form letter to those clients who DID NOT come back this past year and ask them why. Give them choices, give them a prepaid return envelope, and give them anominity.

Lalva (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
I have the same fear as Inagpurwala, and I haven't raised my fees in 3 years. What I do is to charge more to new clients. I am still more economical than HRBlock, which I shouldn't because I provide a much better service.

But as TheTinCook pointed out, I'll take a pricer shopper over someone willing to pay a more than average fee for a 'fraudulent' return (I refuse to take an average of two clients per year because of this).

94nole (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
So, Lalva, are you telling me that your expenses have not increased in 3 years? Better yet, that you aren't worth a pay raise? What if you worked for someone else who didn't offer you a pay raise in 3 years?

Let me know where you live, I want to move there and start a business.

Seriously, if you aren't raising your fees each year, you are cheating yourself. Now, there may be those that you charge the same fee...maybe they referred 2-3 new clients to you...maybe you are related or they are good friends or business relationships who provide you services of value.

I can guarantee that your clients are paying more for bread, milk, lawncare, etc. If you are good, they won't even bat an eye. They enjoy having someone they know, that they can count on, that provides good service, etc.

Clients don't like to change. Those who do, you don't want.

If people are using you because of your price...you are underpriced. Period.

You deserve a pay raise...I would recommend at least 10-15%.

Lalva (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
94nole, of course, you are RIGHT!!!

I live in expensive San Francisco Bay Area (in California). My expenses have gone up and my clients are very happy. Like Inagpurwala, some clients have given me $25 more than billed, others tell me that I am undercharging... In addition to that I don't charge some clients because they didn't have much income for the year :(

OK, you win, next tax season I will start with 5-10% increase and see how it goes...

When I worked for HR Block, some clients complained every year about the fees and said they will find another tax preparation firm, and guess what? They always went back, so you have a point!

Skasselea (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
A few things. First, if you are trying to compete with tax preparers who advertise on Craigslist, you are generally dealing with (and I use the term loosely) bottom feeders who are looking for the lowest price only. Second, if you ever run across any tax preparer who is not licensed to prepare tax returns in California, you must turn them in to CTEC. Just give them the details and they will go after them. Third, you have to decide the marketplace in which you want to compete.

KINGFISH (talk|edits) said:

20 May 2008
Just had a new battery for car--Labor rate at the local

Lexus dealer is $ 122.00 per hour-and I was charged for 1/2 hour to instal the battery-Labor charge for the 1/2 hour blue book was $ 65.00--Not only over charged but can't even figure that it should have be 61.00-but was rounded to neares $ 5.00 So you figure ..

GrinnenTL (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
I go through this each year myself. How I handle it is by offering early bird discounts. I offer 20% off 15% off etc if clients bring in their return by specified dates. If I raise their rates, but they get a discount, they don't complain as much.

Marcilio (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
If you don't lose a client or two each year because of price, you aren't charging enough. You are in the assurance business, not the tax preparation business. Good clients want to be assured that they are getting a good value for their money. When someone calls me and the first words out of his/her mouth is "How much?", I laugh and ask them, "Is price the only issue? How about the stability of someone who's been helping clients gain financial security for XX years?" And so on. I try to find something to get them to laugh & realize how ridiculous the question is.

Unless your clients are driving around in 15 year old Dodge Omnis, they are not looking for price, they are looking for value. Sell it to them just that way.

By the way, my average fee is around $700, and I can't keep people from referring.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

May 21, 2008
Tin, have you processed your CTOBET list yet... I still having 'discussions' with my employees as to which one's are actually getting the axe.

94nole (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
CTOBET? Am I the only one who doesn't know what this means? Obviously it is the clients to fire list but I'd love to know the acronym.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
Belle, it depends if I go back. If I don't, then I don't have to worry about it. If I do, I really can't fire them, but I can set them up with someone else. This last season, I let a coworker have one of my "One more W-2" clients (Three times she called back with another w-2 or two. THREE!), but he saddled me with Crazy QDRO Lady. But yeah, I have a mental list of likely candidates.

94nole, clients to be terminated. A term some of us have used since people got wise to PITA.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
My term has always been the S___ List, or SL for short.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

May 21, 2008
94 - I came up with it (actually the acronym came from my office manager)
C(lients) TO BE T(erminated)  = CTOBET

We kept it as a word file on the desktop of the main computer and updated during tax season as various & sundry clients were obnoxious and/or irritating. It was discussed in one thread severeal times, I just can't remember which one. Something to do with how/when to fire clients.

I like it because I don't think ANY client could figure it out, even if they happened to see it.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

May 21, 2008
Hey, do a search - I was just surprised at how many hits came up :-)

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
Ha. I'm with Kingfish, and I've mentioned this before. Going to the mechanic will give you complete peace of mind as far as bumping fees up. Different field, different supply/demand, but still! P.S. I lost some new client scd. C's this year because my minimum for just that scd. is $250, but...I was determined to draw the line.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

May 21, 2008
How about the plumber who charged my little old widowed neighbor $ 360 for a half hour job?!!?!

Not that I want to be a plumber...but jeez. Do any of 'us' on this forum charge $ 720 an hour?

I vow, right now, to raise my rates AND stick to the increases even if there's whining.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
Yes, and the small plumber does not have the overhead of the mechanic.

I have had good luck with "add ons", $25.00 document storage fee, but I don't Efile. I'll probably Efile for 08, and then it will become some other storage fee. "3 Year Hard Disk Storage" lol. No one has batted an eye at this storage fee.

From the legal side, I don't charge for copies. I get it some other way. The reason is that I have tried to charge, and got everything from sarcastic jokes, to outrage!

Belle (talk|edits) said:

May 21, 2008
I'm not sure how small he was [ <wink> visions of plumbers 'crack'].

He definately took advantage of this lady; it's a second home for her, she's in assisted living 4 hours away, her husband died last year and (of course) he always deealt sith these things. It just chaps my hide, my husband & I live across the street and have somewhat adopted her in the sense of trying to help with this type of stuff. The rental management company hired the plumber, before we could intercede. And I'm not even sure the repair was done properly. Such a bummer.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
Did you even think the rental agent gets a kickback, or free work done on his properties?

Not to defend this gouger, but I have owned 3 houses in my life and two were built pre-Codes.....even 'simple' jobs in those money pits (like where we live now) are grief to some tradesmen. Putting in new outlets on the second floor of my first 1930 built house caused an electrician to walk away after he realized the price he quoted did not take into account snaking wires down stone and stucco walls. Or here, plumbers dealing with the heater must crawl into the space under the house, which usually has to be pumped out first if there has been rain.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

May 21, 2008
I sure HOPE not....as the realtor is a client of mine (I'm in a really small town :-) and he's one that I have a lot of respect for. He's the agent, but not the broker; I don't know the broker that well, nor his ethics.

The repair was an outside the house job to cap off a 'stand pipe' that was broken by sliding snow from the roof. We (my husband) had already shut off the water. The repair was done while my husband was out of town; so he wasn't around to monitor it...and I don't do plumbing. He didn't repair the break and put the outside bib back to functional status; he just capped it off.

Unfortunately, the bill's been paid. I am going to discuss with her daughter when she visits from the 'other' coast next weekend. The situation just irritates me (can you tell) and I tend to tilt at windmills from time to time; some battles just have to fought even if the amounts aren't material.

Taxman7 (talk|edits) said:

May 21, 2008
Hmm, after reading these posts, it seems I need a gauge to use to adjust prices, I

think I will use the CPT method plus the CPB method,, that is, the 'cost per tank' of gas when I fill my truck plus the cost per (grocery buggy) when I fill my grocery cart should be equal to my average client charge, using this method I'll definitely have some rate increases in the next couple of years, LOL,,, or maybe on a 1040A, when the gas station client says' "How much do ya'll charge?" I can answer, "A tank of gas" , I wonder if he thinks that will be too high!

Lalva (talk|edits) said:

21 May 2008
I just answered a NATP survey about tax preparation fees. I hope they offer the results to everyone to see. I wish this was something uniform, just get a table with the fees, of couse having in account if someone is an EA, CPA, LAWYER or just a CTEC (that would be me... for now, since I am preparing for the EA test), and years of experience. And voila, you find the fee to charge!

Iaklein (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
Also, keep in mind that if you don't raise a client ie $10 this year...you may very well be cheating yourself out of $10 for that client for the next 20 years...doesn't sound like much...but then multiply that by 100, 200, 300+ clients... it becomes quite costly

Marcilio (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
What's a CETC?

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
It's a California thing, I believe.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
Must have something to do with avocados then.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
The California Tax Education Council (CTEC) is the group in charge of licensing CA tax preparers and maintaining the strategic avocado stockpile.

Larousse (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
I thought the state bar would be in charge of the strategic avocado stockpile <smirk>

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
Nope, we only trust them with the tortilla chip reserves.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
yeah, but you don't let them touch the salsa do you?

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
Good God no! After all, we EA's have to be good for something.

Inagpurwala (talk|edits) said:

22 May 2008
CTEC = California Tortilla Eating Contest! ha ha ha.....Inagpurwala 18:25, 22 May 2008 (CDT)

LakesFan (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2008
Inagpurwala-

As I plan to begin preparing returns "professionaly" this coming tax season -I live in Los Angeles-near Santa Monica and already have a good feeling I will be undercharging for my services. Since January - I've compiled a listing of 100 or so local CPA's (from various sources - yellow pages, internet search etc) to guage what the current market is like. Out of a 50% success rate, what I found amazed me (It felt like I was pulling teeth for this info). Average prices for 1040EZ's ran at about $175 - all the way to $500-$900 for 1040's + schedule A,C,D,E etc depending on client organization.

For my current clientele (consisting of 40 or so friends, friends of friends etc), I've been extremely underpriced over the previous 3 years - with a price of $70 for a 1040A, and $100 for a 1040. Even though I was not signing the return as a professional paid preparer - I'm offering more than just H&R services - (available to answer questions year round - individual tax planning- W-4, 401(k), "free advice" for my schedule C filers etc). My ultimate fear is that increasing the price will result in 0 client retention - but at the same time, they are happy with what I offer and know they can count on me come tax season and knowing they have a consistent CPA to ask questions.

For what it's worth - here is what i've come up with after doing a bit of local market research and considering I'm just starting my professional preperation career (which I hope will lead to my primary job come 4-6 years with 700-800 clients):

Min price: $125 1040EZ-$125 1040A-no adjustments $150 - w/adjustments $175 1040 - $200 Sch A $75 + Sch C $125 (depends on organization) + Sch D $50 min ($5 per line over 5 lines) + Sch E $50 min ($25 for each prop over 2 props)

I honestly believe my current clients will not seek other preparers once I raise my fees to a "fair" market price (even though I know I am STILL undercharging). I even plan on instituting a referall system. Something along the lines of doing your return for free next year (or this year if I have not yet prepared it) for every 5 PAYING clients you refer. Or a $20 referral fee for every PAYING client you bring me.

What does everybody think of my suggested fee structure considering my location and the level of competition in LA? I'm very interested to see what you think.

LakesFan

SCCPA (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2008
"Even though I was not signing the return as a professional paid preparer"

The first thing you need to do is sign those returns. You don't have to be a "professional" paid preparer to be required to sign the returns, just a paid preparer. Failure to sign penalties can add up in a hurry.

LakesFan (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2008
Thanks for the info SCCPA - I definitely do claim the minimal income earned. Any comments on the fee strategy?

Marcilio (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2008
Regarding increase of fees..if you increase your fees by 10%, you will not lose 10% of your old clients, or 20-20%. But even in the unlikely event that did happen, you will attract a clientele who want to work with successful professionals. I discovered that my referral base went up as my fees increased. I think the main reason is that I felt better about myself and my attitude improved.

Believe me, your clients know you are undercharging. They just won't tell you.

SCCPA (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2008
I think you missed my point - the problem isn't reporting or not reporting the minimal fees earned, the problem is not signing the returns. If you are a paid preparer, you can be assessed for penalties for failure to sign whether you report the income or not.

Marcilio (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2008
Oops..3rd time I've been caught tonight. Sorry, I was responding to LakesFan earlier post. ☺

LakesFan (talk|edits) said:

23 May 2008
SCCPA - noted. I will not make the same mistake going forward. I do not want to begin on the wrong foot.

Lalva (talk|edits) said:

24 May 2008
Marcilio said: "Believe me, your clients know you are undercharging. They just won't tell you".

My clients tell me I am undercharging.

Lakes, I am in expensive Bay Area and your fee schedule sounds fair. I think that I am going to adopt it too, if you don't mind, of course, he, he.

And thank you Marcilio for telling us that you didn't go out of business for raising your fees. The thing is that if you are undercharging (that would be me) maybe people think that you are not too good, perhaps?

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

25 May 2008
For those of you charging by the hour, and, for instance, doing fiduciary returns, here's your expected take (smile), courtesy of the paperwork reduction notice:

Form 1041 Schedule D Schedule D Tax Schedule J Schedule K-1 Worksheet Recordkeeping 64 hr., 17 min. 15 hr., 4 min. 8 hr., 51 min. 39 hr., 27 min. 7 hr., 39 min. Learning about the law or the form 24 hr., 3 min. 2 hr., 27 min. - - - - 1 hr., 17 min. 47 min. Preparing the form 44 hr., 42 min. 3 hr., 44 min. 8 min. 1 hr., 59 min. 57 min. Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS 5 hr., 21 min. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Imagine columns going across. So, for learning about the law, they give you 24 hrs (oh, and 3 minutes for crying and knocking your head against a table), since you know the law so well at this point, it's not surprising you are given.. what!? 44hrs, 42 mins to prepare the form 1041 (after you've spent 64 hours getting your records organized, lol), and of course, extra time for various schedules. 5 hours (billable time)for getting it ready to mail in. This is obviously right because the IRS did extensive studies on this. See, you don't need to sweat over these fee surveys and stuff, it's already been done for you. For an uncooperative client (in this case, often dead), you can tack on more time, as circumstances permit.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

25 May 2008
So, you'd bill 110+ hours for a 1041?

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

25 May 2008
Yes, around $22,000.00; but only for a simple one, this is just the median amount of time it should take one. Keep in mind, this is only for the rural or semi-rural preparer. If you are in the city or suburbs, you would need to tack on travel time also. This is known in the trade as "review of the file".

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

25 May 2008
HOLY BATBUCKS!!

I know what my next CPE is going to be.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

25 May 2008
Yes, but keep in mind, this only works if you spend 24 hours and 3 minutes learning the law. If you were to spend a year learning the law, you're increased efficiency would likely do you in.

TheTinCook (talk|edits) said:

25 May 2008
Damn my frail human brain!

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

25 May 2008
Can you Efile a 1041? You'd be a fool to, if you could bill 5 hours to mail it.

Tdh555 (talk|edits) said:

26 May 2008
I am glad this discussion became inane...I am so tired of wimpy tax preparers (especially CPA's like myself) who do not have the cahones to charge properly for all their training, skill, business risk and client grief. We have a similar discipline to docs, dentists and attorneys but generally a much lower self worth (in a financial sense). This, of course, pulls all our standard charges down.

Marcilio (talk|edits) said:

26 May 2008
Interesting story. Gerry Tollefson, who was one of the co-founders of Gear-up seminars (formerly Nuts & Bolts), set this up. He said that he always had the client set the fees. Now does that make sense? If you do it this way it does. At the initial interview, after you've looked over the info, come up with a price you can live with, not what you want, but enough for a small profit - Say $200. The client will nod. Then you say, "of course, you have mutual funds that have a lot of activity, that'll be another $75. The client will be silent. Then you say, "This employee business expense may create alternative minimum tax, that'll be another $100. If the client is silent, you go on, and on, until the client finally says, "Whoa, that's getting to be a lot of money." Guess what. The client has just named his price.

It works.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
Marcilio, I like that. I'm gonna have to try.

Kmikeburns (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
I have the most problems with taxpayers who I discount fees for.

I am reading a book that stresses the difference between dealing with customers versus clients. Customers are likely to be shopping for fees. Clients appreciated the advice and don't generally mind paying for it.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
Discount? Do you have a Blue Light special? Or maybe a Toyotathon?

Sorry, but that word seems abhorent as I see our profession. I see no problem with knocking off $25 because your client recommended Joe Smith and Jane Brown, but not as a discount but as a thank you, a way of saying 'I value your business; thank you for thinking of me,' but I can only think of maybe one client who gets this treatment.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

May 28, 2008
I do occasionally do a "professional discount"...mainly for stock broker clients who refer many of their clients to me for tax work. I want them to see the full charge/value and then see the 'thank you' for refering client to me.

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
I have a "discount" for parishioners of my church. They get the ad from the back of the church bulletin. Funny part, it's not much and the client thinks they got a bargain and they refer others to me. It works.

The overall problem I have experienced is the potential client who says, "My last preparer only charged me $100 or my return isn't that hard" when they dump on you a return with 100 stock trades, Schedule C, Schedule E, etc. I had that happen a couple of times. So I make sure they come in for an interview before I quote a price. I refuse to quote anything over the phone anymore because some will hold your feet to the fire on your price if you give them one.

Tom

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
Tom, how about a direct statement of hey, you can't hold me to this because I do not have your whole picture. I don't mind a quick phone quote, but I specifically tell them a few times that it is a quote and that quite often clients tell me one thing on the phone and then once you dig, there are underlying issues and they cost money.

Like a roofer who quotes you new roof, he starts pulling off old shingles nad notices rot and the need to replace the wood, that's not in the quote, additional fee.

Just make sure you specifically tell them that a quote is a quote. If they huff and puff, send em away.

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
Fred,

Good point. I just like to be a "man of my word" and stick with my price when I give it to them. However, your approach makes sense. Many times people I think try to pin you down and lowball you intentionally because they are cheap so and so's.

Tom

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
The phrase I like and might use is 'sandbagging' as in 'You didn't tell me about the 15 stock trades even when I asked you about the stock market, you sandbagged me.' One thing I do when giving an idea of price over the phone or when they sit down is note that if I find all is not what they have told me, I will stop and let them know at that point. Another decent way is to quote my average fee.

Joanmcq (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
I will give them a basic price for say, itemized return. But even before I do, I'll dig...'do you have a business? rentals? employee expenses? home office?. If they do, I go over the merits of coming in with records compiled or an organizer filled out vs. a shoebox of receipts. good records, Sch C starts at $50; shoebox is $100/hr.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
It's not going back on your word Tom, to quote a price over the phone and to lock that price in is quite foolish actually. Yes, they may complain, but the reason there is a difference is because they didn't tell us everything. If the return is what they said it was, then yes, the quote should be the price. I have become the king of disclaimers.

Another ferinstance is when one of my preparer finished a return and I haven't reviewed it yet, client wants to know what refund or amount due is. I tell them it is policy to not disclose that until return is reviewed as there could be a huge swing in the return. Clients say ok, I then tell them that the return refund is, let's say $1,980, but that when I review, if the preparer made an innocent mistake it could wind up being that the client owes $3,278 and they aren't allowed to complain if that happens. I say it a few times and let them know that that is how it is, they can't hold me to an estimate or a number from an unreviewed return.

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

28 May 2008
While this theory is difficult to execute, I try to position myself as an expert (whether that's true is not the really the point) and get a good fee. I believe that we (CPA's and EA's especially) should market ourselves as professionals, not take on just any client, and over time the fees will be there. I usually quote "our minimum is $xxxxx, if you have stock trades above 10, a business, or a rental, it will be more. I also ask "Why do you need a CPA". I am certain you can find a different accountant that may be bit less"

At least 1/2 of my calls hang up when they hear this. I got over it and revenue has NOT suffered.

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

29 May 2008
I agree SouthPark and I have only recently been doing just this. I get new prospects and they ask questions about fees and I still hesitate. It's that short selling of ourselves that we do. I try to always take a step back and wait to set the fee as I want to make sure I do it right and that i get what I should for my services. Two fold process in that the client base I bought has been severely undercharged and I have to be conscientious in how I raise their fees in that the person I bought the firm from is still around and I try to respect his way of doing things. While I own this one, we do consider each other partners of a sort wherein we are buying a small 90 return practice as of 1/1/09 and we are running that one out of his other office which I don't own yet. But new clients get Freddy World billings. I just did an 06 return, small sch C, sch E two rentals and a W-2. Old days might have charged $200 worrying about client getting angry. I charged $600 with a $100 discount. Unlike others, I do like listing discounts, Clients like the feeling that you are giving something back. Plus it was a way of showing the clients that I bought what they should have been paying.

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

29 May 2008
Fred

That in my view is a very respectable fee for the work.

Beats working in retail on Long Island!

Matt

Fsteincpa (talk|edits) said:

29 May 2008
I agree Matt. Naturally, I would love to charge double that, but I'm more than happy with that.

It's funny, and it's not funny, but I have clients that are happy to pay me $1,000 for a small easy corporate return and for the same type of return that the previous guy did and charged $300, they complain. Easing those guys up in price or out the door.

Tdh555 (talk|edits) said:

11 June 2008
Client (usually a prospective one): "How much will my return cost"?

Me: "How long is a string"?

Taocpa (talk|edits) said:

11 June 2008
Well, I for one am getting tired of this discussion with clients. I just got told by a client of 4 years I am charging him too much. He sandbagged me last week when I was fighting off a cold on top of my current health issues (another thread). He told me that he had to his costs are up, business is down (not according to his recent monthly sales), he can find someone cheaper and my health issues were a concern. I barked at him, which I rarely do with any client, telling him how dare he try to take advantage of recent health problems to lower my fees. My costs are up too. I have not increased your fees in four years, I told him. I asked if these others were CPA's. He said no. I said no other CPA would take his phone calls like I do at 8pm or 9pm and jump through the hoops I have for him. He was stunned and soon backed down. If he brings it up again, I will fire his fanny on the spot.

Tom

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums