Discussion:How many of you have insurance

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Business Growth Community --> How many of you have insurance

Adf1002 (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
How many of you to cover you professional? Some people have it and some people don't. Whats a good amount to have as coverage in case anything happens?

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
I would suggest at least $1,000,000. You'll probably find that the cost of increasing the amount is a declining percentage of the initial amount.

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
1) Probably less than all of us. 2) Enough to cover the largest claim that might be made against you.

Check out CAMICO or Aon (the AICPA's plan). Both are good carriers. I think Aon is somewhat cheaper.

JAD (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
It's crazy to practice w/o insurance.

Check out NAPLIA. Every couple of years I get quotes from several plans, and these guys broker comprehensive coverage from solid companies at a fair price. I obtained a quote from CAMICO recently - they were 3 x as expensive.

Newtaxman (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
Agree with Jdugancpa. Professional liability through AICPA AON. Very inexpensive. AIPCA also offers Business Owner's Policies,disability, etc.

Cigarmanpr (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
Are you talking E&O insurance or other kinds?

Adf1002 (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
Yes, liability. Malpractice.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

December 27, 2007
I agree with JDugan and Jennifer. Obtaining a liability policy was one of the first things I did when I started my practice.

Southparkcpa (talk|edits) said:

27 December 2007
My office, a small 4 person firm , does only tax work and compilations.

I have malpractice insurance of only $100K, liability insurance on my office space is required by lease of $1 million. Malpractice ins costs about $1,000 annually with a 5K deductible.

I would never practice without it. You never know what can happen. I have NEVER been sued but just last month I was threatened by a buyer of one of my clients businesses. He failed as the new owner because he was under capitalized and ran the business as an absentee. He called me and said the financials were not accurate.

They happen to agree to the tax return and are VERY accurate.

Yet if he sues the seller, it costs NOTHING to add the accountant as a defendant even though I have no real liability.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

December 27, 2007
Aye. Mine's for tax only, which covers 90% of the possibilities. That keeps the cost reasonable, just a few hundred bucks a year.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

December 27, 2007
Jeff, does your comment mean that you are not covered for the other 10%?

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

28 December 2007
Southpark, $100k would not seem adequate to me, especially if you are issuing financial statements of any kind.

Mtmckeecpa (talk|edits) said:

28 December 2007
My coverage: $2 mil aggregate, $1 mil per claim, $1,000 deductible, cost $851.00 through CNA.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

December 28, 2007
Yep, Nat, 10% of me's naked! I was naked for all for about half my practice years simply due to the cost and the silly rules that insurance companies use to dodge claims. i.e. you have to stick with one company forever, giving them total freedom to rape and pillage on fees since if you leave, your prior coverage ended. Well, we don't know what alligators are in the swamps for a couple years usually. So I passed. Finally, a reasonable policy came along for tax coverage only. I can link nearly everything I do to taxes, whether's it's a consultation or what have you. And the big problems come on tax returns. I'll risk a suit over a non-tax issue, which will boil down to he said she said. I've tried to make things right with clients where I've done wrong with free services, refunds when necessary, much prayer and supplication and humility and offering of sacrifices.

Dingodile (talk|edits) said:

28 December 2007
Southparkcpa - it actually cost attorney's fees and costs (if you client was smart enough to include those clauses in the purchase contract. And it could potentially cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in a counter-suit for malicious prosecution and abuse of process if the case is as frivolous as you make it out to be.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

28 December 2007
JR1 - I just checked out the NAPLIA website...could you confirm that what you have for insurance is JUST the tax preparer policy. The number of options for 'accountants' is overwhelming. Thanks!

Corptaxhelp (talk|edits) said:

December 28, 2007
Every few years, I change my mind on insurance.

On one hand, I feel that having insurance makes me more likely to be sued. With a million dollars of insurance, it is worth hiring a lawyer to track me down and beat me like a dead horse. Without insurance, I have limited assets to go after. I try to keep my attachable assets below the level at which a lawyer would salivate. If there is no money to be made, it will be hard to find an attorney to take the case.

On the other hand, for a couple thousand dollars a year, I can be insured and allow my wife to sleep easier at night.

I'm currently insured but my policy is up for renewal in July. Check back then to see which way the wind is blowing.

Belle (talk|edits) said:

28 December 2007
Hmmmm - interesting viewpoint that I'll have to consider. I assume you are incorporated (or "entitied" if that's a word) to achieve that limited, attachable assets position for attorneys to go after?

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

December 28, 2007
Dingodile brings up an interesting point. I think my policy also covers attorney's costs. I'm pretty sure that's an option to add and something to seriously consider.


I think in most states professionals are not sheltered by any type of entity if they are sued for negligence. In other words, just because a tax preparer is operating out of a corporation, that does not mean that personal assets will not be taken if negligence is proved.


People sue for anything and everything these days. I am just not willing to take any chances in that arena. In addition to the coverage that is afforded under a policy, the insurance company will also provide the attorneys, etc. It's one less thing to worry about if that day ever comes.


JR, what you are doing is risk management. I have had the same carrier since day one. I tried to switch the second or third year, but too much of my revenue came from one client, and the potential carrier would not even give me a quote.

JR1 (talk|edits) said:

December 28, 2007
Belle, I use Western Surety/ CNA Surety, not sure of the connection, but it's E&O with all the defense costs, attorneys and such, but for tax return errors. All taxes, income, payroll, sales....

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

29 December 2007
WHAT? Of course, I have a small policy on my car. Medical insurance with a large psychiatric rider (my M.D. told me most tax preparer's have mental breakdowns at about 22 years on the job).

Some agent tried to sell me an Umbrella Policy, but what to I need to insure my umbrella for? Just buy a new one if it get's stolen.

As far as malpractice, if that's what you mean, I use a Swim at Your Own Risk Policy. It's my policy to ask the client to sign a statement that they use me at their own risk. This seems to work pretty well, never have had one turn me down yet.

Hadlin (talk|edits) said:

29 December 2007
first thing i bought. 1mil policy 500k per incident.

can't wait to check out aicpa policy since i just got licensed.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

December 29, 2007
Crow, I just bought an umbrella policy the other day. It is pretty inexpensive. With the way people sue each other these days, I figured it was time to get some coverage.

Firecracker77 (talk|edits) said:

30 December 2007
I am buying E&O insurance. Below are the break-down of no deductible coverage from the insurer I spoke with:

$250k each incident / $250k aggregate for $505 premium annually $500k each incident / $500k aggregate for $647 premium annually $1MM each incident / $1MM aggregate for $788 premium annually $1MM each incident / $2MM aggregate for $988 premium annually

he quoted higher levels but that's $500k is about as far as I would go. Whatever helps you sleep at night I guess.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

30 December 2007
Natalie, I just got around to insuring my car after driving since 1977. With all my Christmas expenses, I can't afford to insure my umbrella. lol. [Truthfully, I would probably not get an umbrella policy because it can actually attract lawyers to sue you... if you get the logic. i.e. a lawyer might take a weaker case with someone with high P&C coverage. With personal injury lawyers, their first question usually is: what are the policy limits?] But I can see how they give peace of mind also.

Bottom Line (talk|edits) said:

30 December 2007
The other school of thought is that if you have a lot of insurance, the insurance companies will pay to defend you since they don't want those large payouts. A small amount, it's just cheaper to write the check (possibly leaving you stuck with the rest).

Hadlin (talk|edits) said:

30 December 2007
it all depends on your net worth.

If you don't have a lot to protect that you don't need a large policy. Also take into account future earnings.

Anne (talk|edits) said:

30 December 2007
I got insurance which I will hopefully never need. But I wouldn't want to practice without it. I checked with CAMICO but it was way too expensive. I have a good policy that is about $700 per year, $1,000 deductible and coverage up to $750K.

Natalie (talk|edits) said:

December 30, 2007
Good thing you don't live in Hawaii Crow. Car insurance is MANDATORY! And then they make us buy uninsured and underinsured coverage to cover those instances when people are driving illegally without insurance.


I guess another consideration regarding umbrella coverage is that it is there when you want to be able to provide for someone who has an accident. Let's say I have a client come over and he or she slips on the steps and breaks some bones. I'm sure the medical bills and loss of wages would add up fast. With an insurance policy, that's all taken care of.

CrowJD (talk|edits) said:

30 December 2007
But HI is a luxury state. The only requirement we have here is that every driver take a first aid course, if you hit someone, you are required to try your best to save them. If you are within 10 miles of a hospital, you have to run them to the ER, but they have to reimburse you for your gas. So insurance is real cheap here, but I still thought the premium was too high at .002 cents per thousand. If your car is stolen in our state, you have a right for a period of 30 days to steal someone elses car, after that, if you have not stolen one, you have to walk, or take public transport. We know how to keep the fees down here. Ahh, being silly. (Smile).

Belle (talk|edits) said:

30 December 2007
Firecracker....what company did you get the quotes from? I'm 'interviewing' companies to try to find that affordable figure which will allow me to sleep comfortable at night and still pay all the bills.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.