Discussion:Having a fool for a client

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource for Tax Professionals
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Having a fool for a client

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2007
When you are already a lawyer, it costs nothing but your time and $60 to go to Tax Court. This pettifogger contested the early withdrawal penalty on $2,195 of an IRA distribution totaling $21,000+, the rest of which was used to pay his children's college tuition. The $2,195 was spent on a private high school. What is worse is that he did not cooperate with the IRS but rather had his audit in Tax Court.

http://www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/Nolan.TCM.WPD.pdf

Taxref (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2007
It looks like he was simply trying to delay paying for as long as possible. He was pretty lucky, its amazing they didn't fine him.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2007
$220!!!!! Big time lawyer can't pay that.....probably was beneath him.

Proptaxguy (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2007
This tool knew from the beginning that the $2,195 was not a Qualified Higher Education Expense. He wasted the courts time throughout the whole process and should have been fined.

Death&Taxes (talk|edits) said:

10 October 2007
To give him benefit of the doubt [it is "Be Kind to Sharks" week], he probably assumed he had spent the entire amount on college for the two kids when he did the return, or told his preparer he did, then found when questioned that the totals did not add up, so he tried to finesse them with Randolph-Macon, which sounds like a college.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.