Discussion:Excess 401(k) Contribution

From TaxAlmanac, A Free Online Resource
Note: You are using this website at your own risk, subject to our Disclaimer and Website Use and Contribution Terms.

From TaxAlmanac

Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion Forum Index --> Tax Questions --> Excess 401(k) Contribution  

Gmikeg (talk|edits) said:

18 March 2007
Hi,

Client with Excess 401(k) contribution gets refund and makes just under $300 in interest. I may be totaly fried here, and I know where the IRA stuff goes, but where does the 401(k) excess contrib. go?

Thanks,


Mike

Larry0434 (talk|edits) said:

18 March 2007
Should receive a 1099 R

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

18 March 2007
Which year was the excess contribution and which year was the refund paid? Generally, the excess occurs in Yr1 and refund is issued in Yr2. Yr1, technically the excess gets added to Line 7, wages. I prefer to make it more apparent by putting on line 21 and labeling it "Excess 401K contribution". Yr2 the refund comes. It should be reported in two pieces. The excess contribution should come on 1 1099-R with a distribution code of P? (I think, but I'm too tired/busy/lazy to look it up). That tells the IRS and the tax preparer that it was already taxed in Yr1 and shouldn't be taxed again. The earning get reported on a second 1099-R and as I recall are just a regular distribution subject to tax and early w/d penalty, if applicable. If the refund occurs after April 15 (17 in 2007?), it is taxable in Yr1 when over contributed and is taxable again in Yr2 when distributed.

Gmikeg (talk|edits) said:

18 March 2007
OK, this is weird. I've got a check stub for the refund, and it includes the excess distribution and earnings. Then I have a 1099-R, also from Principal, for a completely different amount with code P.

By the way the excess contribution was made in 2006, and the interest was also earned in '06, and the check was cut this month.

Gmikeg (talk|edits) said:

18 March 2007
JD, you're right, I just realized that since this income was constructively received in '07, then it should be taxed on next year's return. (Is that right?)

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

18 March 2007
Principal gets taxed in 2006 but you will not receive a 1099-R until Jan/Feb 2008 because it relates to a payment made in 2007. Earnings gets taxed in 2007.

Highjumper (talk|edits) said:

1 April 2007
Hi,

I run into the similar situation. I just received a 401k rufund (Excess deferrals + earings) for 2006. the check is dated on 3/12/2007, which is before 3/15/2007. The letter says I will not received my 1099-R until Jan 2008 however I should include my refund as 2006 income. So, should I just report the exces deferras in line 7 for 1040 and leave the earnings for the next year?

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

1 April 2007
Do you want a different answer than has previously been given? Please read again.

Www.cpa1.biz (talk|edits) said:

1 April 2007
So what you are saying, is:

excess contributions go back to W-2 income

and in next year, you will receive a 1099-R, that you will pay what?????? taxes on interest, amount contributed, ....

Highjumper (talk|edits) said:

1 April 2007
Thanks for your quick response Jdugancpa, I did read it again and again. :) The reason I am asking is the letter I received says I must include my "refund" in my 2006 income. However the refund check is made of two portions, excess contribution and earnings. Per your instructions, i should only have the excess contribution included in 2006 income while leave the earings to the next year. So i think what the letter says must be incorrect. Please advice, and thank you again!

Jdugancpa (talk|edits) said:

1 April 2007
Heres the deal: EE defers $10k at ER#1. Changes jobs, defers $6k at ER#2. Under 50, limit is $15k; excess deferral of $1k. Taxguy discovers problem in March. Now the excess deferral with earnings has grown to $1100. EE informs ER#2 plan administrator who rushes refund so the excess deferral gets correcte before 4/15 (4/17 in 2007??, who knows). EE gets refund of $1100. Taxguy adds $1000 to line 7 of 2006 Form 1040 so that his wages are $1000 higher than the W-2 total. In Feb2008 EE gets 1099-R reporting distribution which occurred in 2007. (Actully, I think he should receive 2 1099-R's, one showing distribution code of "P" (I think, going from memory here and it is 11:25 pm Sat) which tells EE, taxguy and IRS to ignore this 1099-R for 2007 because taxguy has already added back into 2006 wages (remember, it was never supposed to have come out of 2006 wages in the first place). The second 1099-R should show the $100 earnings as a distribution from the plan, subject to tax and penalty, if applicable.

Now, if you reread the earlier posts, I am pretty sure it says this same thing, only in different words.

One more thing: if EE and taxguy snooze and the distribution does not come out until after 4/15 (or 4/17, or whatever the correct date is this year) then the excess contribution is includable in 2006 wages (remember, EE contributed more than allowed) and the distribution of principal is taxable again in 2007 upon receipt. PLUS, I think the excess contribution is subject to a 6% excise tax until such time as it is corrected.

You snooze, you looze.

Highjumper (talk|edits) said:

4 July 2007
Thanks Jdugancpa, you rock!

Www.cpa1.biz (talk|edits) said:

1 April 2007
Ya, JD, thanks a lot!!!

Pxhop (talk|edits) said:

3 April 2007
I had an excess 401(k)contribution in 2006 because of a failed ADP test, and the refund was paid by March 15, 2007. In January 2008 I will receive a 2007 1099-R with code P (taxable in 2006). Would there be any penalty if I waited until I received the 1099-R in January 2008 and then filed a 1040x for 2006?

Simple question (talk|edits) said:

20 February 2008
Hi, I have a similar question. I received a distribution from my 401(k) in 2007 for my contributions in 2006. I did not contribute more than $15,000 so it took me by surprise. My employer told me that "the plan failed some percentage test involving your deductions over your salary". I called my 401(k) provider and they could not give me much information except that

1. distribution was made on April 12 2007 2. They do not think that I contributed more than I was supposed to in any given pay period because I can contribute up to 65% of my paycheck 3. According to their records the plan failed some 515 leveling test.

Now I am completely confused. I don't think I overcontributed. What does it mean that the plan failed a test? Is it something my employer did not do right? In this case, why am I being penalized? I also received NO 1099 form this year from this employer (I did receive W2, but I dont work there since mid Jan 2007)

Please help me understand what really happened and what implications this has on taxes.

Many thanks!

NYEA (talk|edits) said:

20 February 2008
Actually, I believe there are TWO different concepts being discussed in this thread. Jdugan gave a scenario for Excess DEFERRALS. That is different than an excess CONTRIBUTION.

Corrective distributions of excess contributions are governed by the rules of §4979. If the employer fails to distribute the e.c. by 3/15 (assuming a calendar year plan), the employer must pay an excise tax. That is why you see so many checks near March 15. If the correction is made by March 15, then the employee reports the income in the year it was EARNED. After March 15, the income is reported in the year received. To answer S.Q., 401K plans cannot discriminate in favor of highly compensated workers. Actuaries apply ADP and ACP tests and make this determination as to whether an excess contribution has been made.


Excess deferrals are governed by §402. Money taken out by April 15 is taxed in the year earned. However, the earnings are taxed in the year received. If you take out the distribution after April 15 you get hit with a double tax. As jdugan noted these excesses are taxed twice- see §402(g)(2)

Simple question (talk|edits) said:

20 February 2008
NYEA, thank you very much for reply! I am sorry if I confused two different things. Let's talk about my situation so that I don't get confused any further.

From what I understand, it is not something I have done that caused this, it's the actual plan that failed a test (but interestingly enough, my employer told me that it was my fault because I overcontributed). Btw, I am not a highly compensated employee - I was actually sort of junior in that consulting firm of fewer than 50 people.

So clearly, the correction was not made before March 15. It means the employer has to pay excise tax? But I still have to report it in 2007 AND pay taxes? If I had to, I would MUCH RATHER pay taxes on that ammount in 2006 because I was in a lower tax bracket than in 2007. What I do not understand is why I am being penalized for something my employer did or did not do? I clearly had no means of identifying the problem and resolving it.

About this ADP and ACP - just to make sure I understand. They compare what percentage of income different groups of employees contribute to 401(K)? So if there are 20 people working in the form, 10 are paid $100K/year and 10 are paid $30K/year. The first group contributed all $15,500 each and the other 10 contributed $0, then all people in the high-compensation group will receive a check and (have to pay taxes), even though they contributed below/at the limit set by IRS?

I very much appreciate help with this. I am sorry if I am asking stupid questions - it just something I know nothing about.

NYEA (talk|edits) said:

21 February 2008
S.Q.

I am far from an expert on this. I think you have the basic concept correct. The ADP (actual deferral percentage) of eligible highly compensated employees is compared to the ADP of all other eligible employees and must satisfy one of 2 tests. For example, Test 1 says the ADP for the plan year of HCE cannot exceed the ADP of all other eligible employees for the preceeding year multiplied by 1.25. I think Test 1 can also be modified to look at the current year. Obviously, we and the taxpayers only see the final result after the plan administrators do their calculations. This gets much too complicated for me. I just take the 1099s as given. :)

HCE employees are defined in §414(q). Basically, HCE employees are 5% owners OR those who earn over 105K (2008 inflation adjusted) AND were in the top-paid (top 20%) group for the preceeding plan year. VERY confusing. I think my facts are relatively accurate but no guarantees, warranties, etc.

Simple question (talk|edits) said:

21 February 2008
NYEA, thank you!

Ok, I am clearly not HCE. I was not a 5% owner, and I did NOT make over 105K (I wish!)

This gets me thinking.. Is there a reason for an employer to lie about this? Any benefit to them? They never even sent me a 1099! I dont even know how to report this!

Side note: that company was highly disfunctional, that's why I left. I would not be surprised if they completely messed this one up.

Djvermont (talk|edits) said:

29 March 2008
I am not a tax expert, so please be patient with me. I received a check from my employer in March 2007 for excess contributions to my 401K in 2006 (due to company failure of non-discrimination testing). I included the amount of the refund as income on my 2006 return. When I received the check, the accompanying letter indicated I would receive a 1099R in Jan 2008 (which I did). My question - the amount on the 1099R is slightly different that the amount I received from my employer (roughly $200 higher). What do I do about this difference?

Deb123456 (talk|edits) said:

15 July 2008
I'm sensing the 1099-R may be incorrect and that the $200 may be interest income.

Call your HR department and ask if the $200 is interest.

Interest is taxable in year received which is in this case, 2008 tax return.

To join in on this discussion, you must first log in.
Personal tools

Discussion Forums